Listen to the article
In the aftermath of a devastating shooting at Brown University that left two students dead and nine others injured, authorities continue to search for the gunman while misinformation spreads rapidly across social media platforms.
The violence erupted around 4 p.m. Saturday during an economics study group in the Barus & Holley engineering building, forcing the prestigious Ivy League campus into a 12-hour lockdown. Despite an extensive manhunt that began immediately after the shooting, the suspect remains at large as of Monday afternoon, with investigators providing no information about potential motives or suspects.
The two deceased victims have been identified as Mukhammad Aziz Umurzokov, a freshman studying neuroscience who was a naturalized citizen from Uzbekistan, and Ella Cook, a sophomore from Alabama who served as vice-president of the school’s College Republicans of America chapter.
In the absence of concrete information about the shooter, prominent right-wing figures have quickly filled the void with unsubstantiated claims that the attack specifically targeted conservatives. William Donahue, president of the College Republicans of America, claimed without evidence that Cook “was allegedly targeted for her conservative beliefs, hunted, and killed in cold blood.”
Far-right podcast host Benny Johnson similarly asserted without proof that the shooting was a targeted attack, writing, “The left’s violent rhetoric has turned into nationwide violence.” Other conservative social media personalities, including Chaya Raichik of LibsofTikTok, conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer, and New York City Councilwoman Vicky Paladino, have amplified these unverified allegations.
The rush to politicize the tragedy comes as conservatives continue to mourn Charlie Kirk, the high-profile activist who was assassinated in September. Kirk, who made his career partly by debating liberal students on college campuses, represented to many conservatives the same path that Cook was following as a conservative leader at an Ivy League institution.
“If people thought I became radical after we lost Charlie, they’re really not going to like me now,” Donahue wrote on X. “There’s 300 college republicans chapters in our organization. Every single member is family to me. I just lost a sister and I’m really fucking pissed off. The left wants us dead.”
The spread of unverified information extends to the highest levels of government. President Donald Trump incorrectly posted on TruthSocial Saturday that a suspect was in custody, contradicting an alert from Brown’s Department of Public Safety issued minutes later stating the “situation remains ongoing” – a potentially dangerous miscommunication.
FBI Director Kash Patel further complicated matters by claiming credit for detaining a person of interest, though local authorities later clarified there was no evidence connecting this individual to the shooting. The person was subsequently released, but not before their personal information had been widely circulated. This marks the second time Patel has made such an error; he similarly misrepresented the arrest status in the Charlie Kirk assassination case.
Law enforcement officials have emphasized that there is no ongoing threat in Providence, though they continue to pursue leads. The Brown University community has been offered counseling resources as students and faculty grapple with the trauma of the attack, which occurred during final exams.
Security experts note that mass shootings often generate conspiracy theories and politicized narratives, particularly when details remain sparse. However, the heightened political tensions following Kirk’s assassination have created an environment where violence on college campuses is immediately framed as ideologically motivated, regardless of evidence.
As the investigation continues, university officials have called for patience and caution regarding speculation. Without confirmed information about the shooter or motive, experts urge restraint in drawing conclusions about the nature of this tragedy that has shaken not only the Brown community but college campuses nationwide.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
This is a tragic and complex situation. While the details remain unclear, the spread of misinformation is concerning and can undermine the investigation. I hope the authorities are able to quickly identify the shooter and determine the motive, so the victims and their families can receive justice.
Agreed, it’s crucial that the facts are established before drawing conclusions. Speculating without evidence is irresponsible and can inflame tensions further.
This is a deeply troubling situation. While the details remain unclear, it’s critical that the investigation is allowed to unfold without being muddied by misinformation or political agendas. The victims and their loved ones deserve the truth, not speculation.
The loss of life in this incident is devastating. I hope the authorities are able to swiftly identify the perpetrator and their motives, so the community can begin the healing process. Spreading unverified claims at this stage is counterproductive and could hinder the investigation.
Agreed. Maintaining transparency and sticking to the facts is the best way to honor the victims and prevent further harm.
My heart goes out to the Brown University community and all those affected by this horrific incident. In times like these, it’s crucial that we resist the urge to jump to conclusions and instead allow the investigation to unfold. Spreading misinformation, no matter the intent, can only serve to further complicate and politicize the situation.
Well said. Maintaining a measured, fact-based approach is the best way forward. The victims deserve justice, not speculation.
My condolences to the families and community affected by this horrific event. I hope the authorities are able to apprehend the suspect and uncover the true motivations behind this attack. It’s important that the investigation is thorough and unbiased, without being influenced by unsubstantiated claims.
Absolutely. Maintaining objectivity and focusing on the facts will be essential for achieving justice and preventing similar tragedies in the future.
This is a tragic event that deserves a thorough, impartial investigation. While the details are still emerging, it’s important that the authorities are given the time and space to uncover the truth, without being undermined by unsubstantiated narratives. The victims and their families should be the priority.
This is a tragic and complex situation that deserves a thoughtful, unbiased investigation. While the details remain unclear, it’s concerning to see the spread of unsubstantiated claims. I hope the authorities are able to quickly identify the shooter and determine the true motives, so the victims and their families can begin to find closure.