Listen to the article
Donald Trump faces accusations of market manipulation after his stock market advice was quickly followed by a policy change that sent markets soaring. The former president posted on his Truth Social platform Wednesday morning that “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! DJT,” just hours before announcing a significant shift in his trade policy.
Less than four hours after his social media post, Trump surprised investors by declaring a 90-day pause on additional trade tariffs for most countries except China. The announcement triggered dramatic rallies in global markets, with the S&P 500 closing up more than 9% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq surging over 12%. The market rally continued into Thursday, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 jumping 9% and London’s FTSE 100 rising as much as 4% in early trading.
Adding to the controversy is Trump’s unusual signature on the post. He rarely signs his messages with “DJT” – which happens to be the same ticker symbol for Trump Media & Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social. The company’s stock price leaped 22% following Wednesday’s market surge.
The timing and sequence of events have prompted serious concerns about potential insider trading. Democratic Senator Adam Schiff has called for an investigation, writing: “These constant gyrations in policy provide dangerous opportunities for insider trading. Who in the administration knew about Trump’s latest tariff flip-flop ahead of time? Did anyone buy or sell stocks, and profit at the public’s expense?”
Fellow Democratic Senator Chris Murphy echoed these concerns on X (formerly Twitter), suggesting that “an insider trading scandal is brewing” and questioning who might have had advance knowledge of Trump’s policy shift.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also weighed in, calling for all members of Congress to disclose any stocks purchased in the 24 hours surrounding the announcement. “I’ve been hearing some interesting chatter on the floor,” she posted on X. “Disclosure deadline is May 15th. We’re about to learn a few things. It’s time to ban insider trading in Congress.”
When questioned by reporters about the timing of his decision, Trump stated he had made the choice “this morning” but had been considering it “over the last few days.” Meanwhile, White House officials defended the move as strategic, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt characterizing it as Trump’s “art of the deal” in action.
The market volatility created by Trump’s trade policies has presented buying opportunities that some investors, including political figures, appear to have capitalized on. Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Trump ally, disclosed several stock purchases on April 3 and 4 – days when markets fell sharply following Trump’s initial April 2 announcement of his “liberation day” tariffs. Her purchases included shares in Amazon and Apple, which subsequently rose 12% and 15% respectively on Wednesday.
While Trump has temporarily paused many country-specific tariffs, he has maintained and even intensified pressure on China, the world’s second-largest economy. He increased tariffs on Chinese imports to 125% from the 104% that took effect Wednesday. Beijing has already responded with 84% tariffs on U.S. imports that began Thursday, raising concerns about an escalating trade war between the world’s two largest economies.
The situation highlights growing concerns about the intersection of politics, policy, and financial markets, particularly regarding potential conflicts of interest and market manipulation. With regulatory deadlines approaching for financial disclosures, the coming weeks may reveal whether any officials had advance knowledge of Trump’s policy reversal and traded accordingly.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
12 Comments
This looks like a concerning situation. If the allegations of insider trading are true, that would be a serious breach of trust. I’m curious to see how this unfolds and whether there is any credible evidence to support the claims.
Yes, it’s important that these allegations are properly investigated. Insider trading undermines the integrity of financial markets.
This is a complex issue that touches on the intersection of politics, finance, and ethics. I’m curious to see how the investigation progresses and whether any concrete evidence of insider trading emerges.
Agreed. It’s important that the inquiry is conducted objectively and transparently, so that the public can have confidence in the outcome.
The allegations of insider trading are concerning, but we must be cautious about drawing conclusions before all the facts are known. I hope the relevant authorities conduct a thorough and impartial investigation to get to the bottom of this matter.
Well said. Maintaining the integrity of financial markets is crucial, and any wrongdoing should be addressed appropriately, regardless of the individual’s political affiliations.
The timing of Trump’s social media post and the subsequent policy shift is certainly suspicious. However, we should be careful about jumping to conclusions without a thorough and impartial investigation.
Agreed. Even public figures deserve due process. Let’s hope the truth comes to light, whatever it may be.
This story highlights the importance of strong market regulations and enforcement to prevent abuse. If these allegations are true, it would be a troubling example of how the powerful can exploit the system for personal gain.
Absolutely. Insider trading erodes public trust in financial institutions and the rule of law. Rigorous oversight is crucial.
While the timing of events is suspicious, we should avoid rushing to judgment. These are serious allegations that require a thorough, impartial investigation to determine the facts and hold anyone accountable if wrongdoing is found.
Well said. In matters like this, due process and adherence to the rule of law are essential, regardless of one’s political leanings.