Listen to the article
The Department of Justice has released thousands of new files connected to its investigations of Jeffrey Epstein, including documents containing allegations against former President Donald Trump and details about his travel on Epstein’s private jet.
The newly published materials follow an initial release over the weekend and contain numerous redactions of names and contact information. Many of the files are partially or completely redacted, which has drawn criticism from lawmakers and transparency advocates.
Among the most notable documents is an FBI case file from October 2020 that contains a rape allegation involving Trump. The heavily redacted document describes an account from an unnamed limousine driver who reported a “very concerning” phone conversation from 1995, in which Trump repeatedly said “Jeffrey” and made references to “abusing some girl.” The document also contains an allegation that “Donald J. Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein.”
Another significant disclosure reveals that Trump may have flown on Epstein’s private jet more frequently than previously known. An internal email from January 2020 sent by the Assistant U.S. Attorney General for the Southern District of New York states that Trump traveled on Epstein’s plane “at least eight times” between 1993 and 1996. On one flight, Trump was reportedly listed as traveling alone with Epstein and a 20-year-old passenger whose name was redacted.
According to the correspondence, Ghislaine Maxwell—Epstein’s accomplice who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for trafficking underage girls—was present on four of these flights. Two other flights included female passengers described as “possible witnesses in a Maxwell case.”
A separate court document details an incident in which Epstein allegedly introduced a 14-year-old girl to Trump in 1994. The filing claims Epstein elbowed Trump and asked, referring to the girl, “This is a good one, right?” to which Trump reportedly “smiled and nodded in agreement.”
The Justice Department included a statement with Tuesday’s release acknowledging that some materials contain “untrue and sensationalist claims” submitted to the FBI shortly before the 2020 election. The DOJ characterized certain allegations against Trump as “unfounded and false” but said it was releasing the documents out of “commitment to the law and transparency” while providing “legally required protections for Epstein’s victims.”
Other files in the release include records of a possible suicide attempt by Epstein on July 23, 2019, approximately two weeks before his death on August 10. Documents show Epstein was placed on suicide watch for the first two days following his arrest on sex trafficking charges.
The release also contains email exchanges between Maxwell and someone using the alias “The Invisible Man” who signs as “A.” In one August 2001 message, this person wrote to Maxwell: “I am up here at Balmoral Summer Camp for the Royal Family” and asked if she had found “some new inappropriate friends.” While no definitive identification is provided, the timing coincides with when Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, left the Royal Navy.
Another document appears to be a letter supposedly sent by Epstein to Larry Nassar, the former U.S. gymnastics team doctor convicted of sexually abusing numerous young athletes. The letter, postmarked August 13, 2019—three days after Epstein’s death—makes references to Trump, though its authenticity is unclear.
Trump has not directly commented on the latest document release but previously described the investigations as a “Democrat Hoax.” On Monday, before the newest files were made public, Trump told reporters: “There were a lot of people that are angry about the files,” and added, “You probably have pictures being exposed of other people that innocently met Jeffrey Epstein.”
The ongoing disclosures have exposed divisions within the Republican Party. Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, who co-led a bipartisan effort to release the Epstein files, responded after Trump called him a “lowlife” for his involvement: “Trump is blaming me for a bill he eventually signed, while defending his banker friends, Bill Clinton, and ‘innocent’ visitors to rape island.”
The DOJ has faced criticism for its handling of the releases, with Massie accusing the department of “protecting the rich, powerful, and politically connected.” Last week’s initial publication included photos of former President Bill Clinton with Maxwell, as well as images of Epstein with celebrities like Michael Jackson and Mick Jagger, though inclusion in these photos does not suggest any wrongdoing.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
While the details in these documents are concerning, I think it’s important to withhold final judgment until more information becomes available. These types of high-profile cases often involve complex issues that require careful and meticulous examination.
This is a sensitive and politically-charged issue. I hope the Justice Department can conduct its investigation in a thorough, impartial manner and provide the public with a clear understanding of the facts, whatever they may be.
This is a troubling development if the allegations are true. I hope the Justice Department will thoroughly investigate these claims and provide transparency to the public. However, we should reserve judgment until more facts come to light.
The newly released documents raise serious questions that need to be addressed. It’s critical that the investigation is conducted fairly and impartially, without political bias. The public deserves to know the truth, wherever it may lead.
I agree, these allegations need to be taken seriously and investigated thoroughly. The American people have a right to know the facts, regardless of political affiliations.
The release of these documents is certainly newsworthy, but I would caution against rushing to conclusions. Reliable, verifiable facts should guide any analysis of this situation. Transparency and due process are crucial in matters of this gravity.
These allegations, if true, are very concerning. However, we must be cautious about jumping to conclusions without a full and fair investigation. The public deserves to know the truth, but it’s important that the process is handled responsibly and objectively.
While the details in these documents are troubling, I think it’s important to withhold final judgment until a more complete picture emerges. These types of high-profile cases often involve complex issues that require careful and thorough examination.
The release of these documents raises many questions that deserve answers. I hope the relevant authorities will provide the necessary transparency and clarity, so that the American people can have confidence in the integrity of the investigation.
The allegations contained in these documents are certainly serious and warrant a full investigation. However, it’s crucial that the process is handled in a fair and impartial manner, without political interference or bias. The public deserves nothing less than the truth.