Listen to the article
Security Guard in Chappell Roan Hotel Incident Disputes Family’s Claims, Defends Actions
The security guard at the center of a controversial incident involving pop star Chappell Roan and actor Jude Law’s 11-year-old daughter in São Paulo, Brazil has come forward to dispute the dramatic claims made by the girl’s family, offering a significantly different account of what transpired.
Pascal Duvier stated on Instagram that his interaction with Ada Law and her mother, Catherine Harding, was “calm and with good intentions,” contradicting allegations that he had aggressively confronted them. Duvier took “full responsibility” for the incident but emphasized he was not part of Roan’s security team.
“I do not normally address online rumors, but the accusations currently circulating are false and constitute defamation,” Duvier wrote. He explained he was at the hotel representing “another individual” and had made a “judgment call” based on unspecified security concerns and “heightened overall security risk” at the location.
The controversy erupted last weekend when Brazilian soccer star Jorginho, Harding’s husband and Ada’s stepfather, publicly claimed on Instagram that his stepdaughter and wife were berated at their São Paulo hotel for allegedly getting too close to Roan during breakfast. According to Jorginho, Ada merely walked past Roan’s table to confirm it was the singer before returning to sit with her mother.
“A large security guard” then approached them and spoke “in an extremely aggressive manner,” accusing Harding of allowing her daughter to “disrespect” or “harass” other people, Jorginho claimed. He stated the confrontation left Ada “shaken and in tears” and directly attacked Roan with the statement: “Without your fans you would be nobody.”
Roan quickly responded with her own account, confirming that the guard was “not my personal security” and stating she never witnessed any interaction. “No one came up to me, no one bothered me. Like, I was just sitting at breakfast in my hotel, and I think these people were staying at the hotel as well,” Roan said in a video clip.
The singer expressed sympathy for the mother and child, saying: “I’m sorry to the mother and child, that someone was assuming something, that you would do something, and if you felt uncomfortable, that makes me really sad. You did not hate that.”
Despite Roan’s apology, Harding continued to air grievances publicly. She posted photos of Ada with singer Lewis Capaldi, who also performed at Lollapalooza Brasil, seemingly to contrast his welcoming attitude with her perception of Roan. In an Instagram video, Harding suggested Roan had not taken full responsibility and questioned whether the security guard had acted with Roan’s authority.
The incident has sparked broader discussions about celebrity-fan interactions and the boundaries of privacy. Slate writer Christina Cauterucci criticized both Jorginho and Harding for turning what she called a “misunderstanding” into an “international witch hunt,” arguing that as a public figure with over 5 million Instagram followers, Jorginho should have exercised more caution before “smearing someone else as a jerk.”
This controversy follows ongoing discussions about Roan’s complicated relationship with fame. The 28-year-old singer has previously faced criticism for setting boundaries on fan interactions outside of performances and official events.
Harding, a former singer and TV presenter also known as Cat Cavelli, had Ada with Jude Law following a brief relationship in 2014. She is now based in Rio de Janeiro with her husband Jorginho.
As the conflicting accounts continue to circulate, the incident highlights the often complex dynamics between celebrities, their security teams, and the public, particularly when children are involved.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


14 Comments
This is a sensitive situation with conflicting narratives. I’m glad the security guard has come forward to share his perspective, as that could help provide important context. Ultimately, a balanced and impartial assessment of the facts will be crucial.
You make a fair point. It’s wise to withhold firm conclusions until all the evidence and accounts can be properly evaluated. Maintaining an open and objective mindset is important here.
The security guard’s statement raises some interesting points that warrant further investigation. It’s good to see him taking responsibility while also disputing certain claims. This will hopefully lead to a more complete picture of the events in question.
Absolutely, it’s important to consider all sides before rushing to judgment. Let’s hope the full truth emerges through a thorough and impartial review of the situation.
The security guard’s statement provides an important counterpoint to the family’s claims. While the details are still unclear, it’s good to see him addressing the accusations directly. This will hopefully lead to a more complete understanding of what transpired.
Definitely. Hearing both sides is crucial to getting an accurate picture, rather than jumping to conclusions based on limited information.
It’s good to see the security guard offering his side of the story. We should be careful about jumping to conclusions without hearing all the facts. I hope this helps provide a more balanced understanding of what happened.
You make a fair point. It’s important to get the full picture before passing judgement in these types of situations.
This is a complex situation with a lot of moving parts. I appreciate the security guard’s attempt to provide his perspective and clarify his role. Hopefully this will lead to a more balanced understanding of what actually occurred.
Agreed, getting all the facts is key before drawing any firm conclusions. These types of high-profile incidents often have more nuance than initial reports suggest.
It’s concerning to see such conflicting accounts around this incident. The security guard’s response raises some valid points that deserve consideration. I hope the full truth can be uncovered through a thorough investigation.
You’re right, it’s important not to rush to judgment without all the facts. Let’s wait and see what additional information emerges on this situation.
This seems like a complex situation with conflicting accounts. I appreciate the security guard taking responsibility, while also clarifying his role and the security concerns he was responding to. Hopefully the truth can be sorted out.
Agreed, these types of incidents often have nuance that isn’t immediately apparent. Let’s wait for more details before drawing firm conclusions.