Listen to the article
Researchers Must Defend Their Work Against Misrepresentation, Health Misinformation Expert Warns
An alarming trend is emerging in scientific communication, where legitimate research is being twisted to support false health claims, particularly around COVID-19 vaccines. This manipulation threatens public health and scientific integrity, requiring researchers to become more proactive in defending their work.
A striking example occurred recently when an X user with 1.9 million followers claimed that a “disturbing” peer-reviewed study had found “100% of COVID vaccinated participants had amyloid microclots circulating in their blood.” The post included video from an anti-vaccine activist declaring the study was “raising alarms about cumulative vascular injuries across the entire globe” from COVID-19 vaccines.
There was just one problem: the research didn’t even study COVID vaccines.
When contacted by NewsGuard, a journalism organization that tracks misinformation, the study’s co-authors Resia Pretorius and Alain Thierry quickly clarified: “Vaccination was not a variable under study, nor was it included in any analysis or interpretation. The study design, methods, and conclusions do not support any claims about vaccines.”
The October 2023 study, published in the Journal of Medical Virology, actually aimed to investigate possible connections between abnormal blood clotting proteins (“microclots”) and long COVID, not vaccines. Anti-vaccine activists seized upon the fact that most study participants had been vaccinated at some point, using this incidental detail to falsely claim causation.
This case exemplifies a broader pattern. NewsGuard has documented over 1,000 false health claims, dozens of which misrepresent peer-reviewed studies from prestigious institutions like Yale, Johns Hopkins, and Imperial College London. Citing reputable institutions lends false claims an air of authority, and most people won’t examine the original research closely.
The problem extends beyond social media. In June, NewsGuard reported that even a Department of Health and Human Services memo to Congress mischaracterized research findings. The memo cited studies to justify recommendations against COVID vaccines during pregnancy, but several study authors told NewsGuard their research was inaccurately summarized. Maria Velez, lead author of a March 2024 study of 246,000 Canadian women, stated her research actually showed “vaccination is not associated with an increased risk of miscarriage” — the opposite of what HHS claimed.
Many researchers are unaware of how their work is being distorted until journalists contact them. While some, like Velez, Pretorius, and Thierry, willingly correct the record, others ignore inquiries or consider responding beneath their dignity. This reluctance to engage allows misinformation to spread unchallenged.
Researchers can take proactive steps to protect their work from misrepresentation. One approach is explaining study results in plain language through carefully edited press releases or summaries for general audiences. Clear descriptions of findings and their significance can potentially “pre-bunk” future misrepresentations by anticipating how legitimate research might be misconstrued.
Another crucial step is simply responding to news organizations and fact-checkers seeking clarification when studies are being misused. Though institutional media relations teams may prefer avoiding controversy, saying nothing poses the greater threat to researcher credibility and public health.
Even with these precautions, determined spreaders of health misinformation will persist. NewsGuard has documented false narratives built from single figures in supplementary appendices taken out of context, or claims that deliberately omit limitations clearly stated by study authors.
The scientific community must recognize its responsibility to communicate clearly and correct misrepresentations of research. In an era of rampant misinformation, defending scientific integrity requires researchers to step beyond traditional academic boundaries and engage directly with public discourse when their work is weaponized against truth.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
It’s concerning to see how legitimate research can be misrepresented to support false health claims, especially around COVID-19 vaccines. Researchers have an important duty to promptly correct any misrepresentations of their work to protect public trust in science.
Absolutely. Proactive communication by researchers is crucial to counter the spread of misinformation and ensure the public has access to accurate, science-based information.
It’s disappointing to see how easily scientific research can be taken out of context and used to support false narratives. Researchers have a responsibility to be vigilant and correct any misrepresentations of their findings.
Agreed. Researchers must be willing to actively engage with the public and media to ensure their work is accurately portrayed and not exploited for ideological or commercial gain.
This is a worrying trend that undermines scientific integrity. Researchers must be vigilant in defending the accuracy of their findings and not allowing their work to be twisted for ideological purposes.
I agree. It’s critical that the scientific community takes a strong stand against the distortion of legitimate research to promote false narratives, especially on important public health issues.
This is a clear example of why researchers need to be more proactive in defending their work against misrepresentation. Failing to correct false claims can allow harmful narratives to take hold, with potentially grave public health implications.
You make a good point. Researchers have a professional duty to ensure their work is accurately portrayed, even if it means actively engaging with the public and media to set the record straight.
It’s troubling to see how easily misinformation can spread, even when it contradicts the actual research. Researchers have a responsibility to be proactive in defending the integrity of their work and correcting any false claims.
Absolutely. Researchers must be willing to take a more active role in countering the distortion of their findings, as allowing misinformation to go unchallenged can have serious consequences for public trust in science.
This highlights the need for researchers to take a more proactive approach in defending the integrity of their work. Allowing misinformation to spread unchecked can have serious consequences for public health.
You make a good point. Researchers should view it as part of their professional duty to promptly address any misrepresentations of their research, no matter the platform or scale of the misinformation.
The ability of anti-vaccine activists to twist legitimate research to support their agenda is very concerning. Researchers must be more vigilant in monitoring how their work is being portrayed and be ready to correct the record.
I agree. Researchers should see it as an essential part of their role to engage with the public and media to ensure their findings are accurately represented, especially on high-stakes public health issues.
The misrepresentation of this study is a clear example of how misinformation can spread rapidly online, even when it contradicts the actual research findings. Researchers need to be more proactive in correcting such falsehoods.
You’re right. Prompt responses from researchers to address inaccurate claims about their work are essential to maintain public trust and ensure science is not misused for harmful purposes.