Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

U.S. Cyber Command Denies Issuing Security Warning to Military Personnel

Defense officials have emphatically denied the authenticity of a viral message claiming to be from U.S. Cyber Command that circulated through military circles on Sunday. The message, which urged service members to disable location services on their electronic devices and warned of compromised commercial applications amid ongoing operations against Iran, was declared false by multiple authorities.

The fabricated alert specifically named several popular applications—Uber, Snapchat, and Middle Eastern food delivery service Talabat—as being “compromised,” triggering concerns among military personnel.

“The command did not issue messages to U.S. service members to turn off location services on their electronic devices and did not issue messages that applications had been compromised,” a Department of War official told DefenseScoop. The source requested anonymity while noting the preferred name for the Pentagon under the Trump administration.

Officials declined to provide information about the origin of the false message or explain why it gained traction within military communities. Captain Tim Hawkins, spokesperson for U.S. Central Command, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, was similarly direct, labeling the message as “false.”

Representatives from the named companies also quickly disputed the claims. An Uber spokesperson stated, “We have no indication that this rumor is true regarding Uber,” while the company publicly responded to social media accounts spreading the message, describing it as an “unsubstantiated rumor.” Similarly, Snapchat informed DefenseScoop that the company did not believe the message to be legitimate.

The false alert emerged during a particularly sensitive period, following the launch of joint U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran that began Saturday. The operation, codenamed Epic Fury, remains ongoing, with U.S. Central Command confirming Sunday that three U.S. service members had been killed during the operation.

The fabricated warning gained significant traction on social media, with one account boasting over 40,000 followers posting the message, generating hundreds of thousands of views. The incident highlights the challenge of combating misinformation during active military operations, with WIRED reporting that false and misleading information about the operation has flooded social media platforms. Central Command has noted that Iran issued “multiple bogus claims” during the first two days of operations.

While this particular warning proved false, security experts have previously expressed legitimate concerns about Iran’s cyber capabilities. Last summer, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) cautioned that Iranian-affiliated cyber actors frequently exploit targets with unpatched or outdated software.

The Middle East Institute has documented how Tehran-linked actors employed “a broad range of operations designed to exert psychological pressure, collect tactical intelligence, enforce deterrence against third countries, and maintain domestic control” during last year’s 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel. The institute further noted that Iran had “intensified its psychological operations through the use of AI to generate and disseminate disinformation.”

When approached for additional comment, U.S. Cyber Command referred inquiries to the Pentagon. Representatives for Talabat did not immediately respond to questions from DefenseScoop.

The incident underscores the complex information environment surrounding military operations, where legitimate security concerns can be difficult to distinguish from misinformation and psychological operations, particularly in regions with heightened cyber threats and ongoing conflicts.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. This incident highlights the need for robust cybersecurity measures and information-sharing protocols within the military. Preventing the spread of false alerts should be a top priority.

    • Liam Johnson on

      Definitely. The military needs to have rigorous processes in place to vet and authenticate communications, especially in sensitive situations.

  2. Emma O. White on

    This highlights the importance of verifying information, especially when it comes to military and security matters. Spreading unconfirmed alerts can cause needless panic and undermine trust.

    • Elijah Martinez on

      Absolutely. The military needs to be very careful about the information they put out, even in sensitive situations. Transparency and clear communication are crucial.

  3. William Taylor on

    Interesting to see the military clarify this. I’m glad Cybercom didn’t actually issue that warning, as that would have been an overreaction. Disabling location services across the board seems like overkill, even in sensitive situations.

    • Agreed. Better to provide targeted guidance rather than broad directives that could create unnecessary disruption.

  4. Oliver Lopez on

    I wonder what the motivation was behind creating and spreading this false alert. Was it an attempt to sow confusion, or just someone sharing unverified information? Either way, it’s concerning to see this kind of misinformation circulating.

    • John E. Miller on

      Good question. The military should investigate the origin of this message to understand the intent and prevent similar incidents in the future.

  5. This is a good reminder that we need to be very cautious about information, especially in sensitive geopolitical situations. Verifying sources and cross-checking facts is essential to avoid spreading misinformation.

    • Amelia Jones on

      Absolutely. With so much information (and misinformation) out there, it’s critical that the military and government communicate clearly and authoritatively.

  6. Liam H. Jones on

    I’m glad the military was quick to respond and clarify that the Cybercom alert was false. Maintaining trust and credibility is so important, especially when it comes to national security issues.

    • Michael Thomas on

      Agreed. Transparency and accountability are crucial for the military and government to maintain public confidence.

  7. Elijah Smith on

    It’s good to see the military taking this seriously and clarifying the facts. Maintaining strong information security and preventing the spread of misinformation should be a constant focus for Cybercom and the broader defense establishment.

    • Michael Martin on

      Absolutely. Cybersecurity and information integrity are critical national security priorities, and the military must stay vigilant against these kinds of threats.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.