Listen to the article
Two Connecticut siblings who orchestrated a sophisticated fraud scheme targeting unclaimed property funds across multiple states have been ordered to return $1.2 million to state treasuries, according to authorities.
Michael Yasipour, 45, and Sheila Yasipour, 43, both residents of Stamford, Connecticut, were found guilty of defrauding the Pennsylvania Treasury and several other state treasury departments of unclaimed assets through an elaborate scheme that spanned several years.
The Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office announced Tuesday that the siblings have been sentenced to five years of probation and must make full restitution to the affected state treasuries. The court order follows a multi-state investigation that revealed how the pair systematically exploited weaknesses in unclaimed property systems.
According to court documents, the Yasipours created fake businesses and submitted fraudulent claims for abandoned property held by state treasuries. They primarily targeted unclaimed insurance policies, dormant bank accounts, and forgotten stock holdings that had been turned over to state governments after years of inactivity.
“This case demonstrates how vulnerable state unclaimed property programs can be to sophisticated fraud,” said Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry. “The defendants specifically targeted high-value unclaimed assets and created elaborate paper trails to legitimize their claims.”
The investigation began in 2019 when a Pennsylvania Treasury employee noticed irregularities in documentation submitted by the siblings. What followed was a complex probe that eventually involved authorities from Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts, all states where the Yasipours had filed similar fraudulent claims.
Unclaimed property programs are designed to protect consumers by safeguarding forgotten assets until rightful owners or heirs can claim them. All 50 states operate such programs, which collectively hold more than $49 billion in unclaimed funds nationwide, according to the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators.
Pennsylvania Treasurer Stacy Garrity said her office has implemented enhanced verification protocols in the wake of the case. “This conviction sends a clear message that attempting to defraud the unclaimed property program will result in serious consequences,” Garrity stated. “These funds belong to the people of Pennsylvania, and we will vigorously protect them.”
The Yasipours’ scheme was particularly sophisticated, investigators noted. They created multiple shell companies with names similar to legitimate businesses that had ceased operations. They then produced falsified documents showing they had acquired the assets of these defunct entities, giving them rights to claim the abandoned property.
Financial fraud experts say such schemes have become increasingly common as more information about unclaimed assets becomes available online.
“State treasuries publish searchable databases of unclaimed property to help legitimate owners find their assets,” explained Richard Matthews, a financial crimes specialist at Georgetown University. “Unfortunately, this transparency can also provide a roadmap for fraudsters who know how to manipulate the claims process.”
The court-ordered restitution will return approximately $800,000 to Pennsylvania’s Treasury and distribute the remaining $400,000 among the other affected states. The siblings must also complete 200 hours of community service and are prohibited from working in financial services during their probation period.
Consumer advocates emphasize that the case highlights the importance of regularly checking unclaimed property databases for legitimate assets. The National Association of State Treasurers estimates that one in ten Americans has unclaimed property waiting to be recovered, with the average claim worth about $2,000.
“While this case reveals vulnerabilities in the system, it shouldn’t discourage legitimate claimants,” said Carolyn Wheeler of the Consumer Protection Institute. “State treasuries are continually improving their verification processes to prevent fraud while ensuring rightful owners can reclaim their assets.”
Connecticut authorities indicated that additional charges could be forthcoming as the investigation into the siblings’ activities continues to develop in other jurisdictions.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
6 Comments
It’s shameful that these siblings were able to bilk over $1 million from state treasuries through fraudulent claims. The fact that they targeted unclaimed property funds, which are meant to help reunite citizens with their lost assets, makes this an especially egregious abuse of the system. Hopefully this case will prompt reforms to close the vulnerabilities they exploited.
This is a classic example of grifters taking advantage of lax oversight and loopholes in state-run unclaimed property programs. While the restitution order is a good outcome, it’s concerning that the fraud went on for years before being detected. More robust auditing and verification processes are needed to protect taxpayer money.
This is a troubling case of fraud and abuse of state unclaimed property systems. While the restitution ordered is a positive step, it’s concerning that these siblings were able to exploit vulnerabilities in the system over an extended period. Stronger oversight and security measures are needed to prevent such scams in the future.
It’s good to see the authorities cracking down on this kind of fraud, but $1.2 million is a huge amount to siphon off from state treasuries. I wonder what specific vulnerabilities in the unclaimed property systems were exploited, and if there are broader reforms needed to close those gaps and protect taxpayer funds.
Agreed, the scale of the fraud is quite alarming. Hopefully this case will spur state governments to review their unclaimed property processes and implement tighter controls to prevent similar schemes in the future.
While I’m glad the authorities were able to catch and prosecute these fraudsters, the fact that they were able to steal $1.2 million over an extended period is quite troubling. State unclaimed property programs need to have much tighter controls and verification processes in place to prevent this kind of systematic abuse in the future.