Listen to the article
One False Social Media Post Fuels Deadly Southport Riots
In the chaotic hours following the tragic knife attack at a children’s dance class in Southport on July 29, one quickly deleted social media post became a catalyst for violent riots across England and Northern Ireland. The single LinkedIn post, written by local resident Eddie Murray, falsely claimed the attack was perpetrated by a migrant, setting off a chain reaction of misinformation that would be viewed millions of times.
Murray’s original post, written about three hours after the stabbings, stated: “My two youngest children went to holiday club this morning in Southport for a day of fun only for a migrant to enter and murder/fatally wound multiple children.” He continued with a call to “close the borders completely,” adding, “Enough is enough.”
The post implied Murray’s children were present at the attack, though the BBC has learned they had actually been turned away from the dance class because it was full. Murray would later tell reporters he was “only posting the information he had been given.”
While his LinkedIn post was only seen by a few hundred people before being removed for violating platform policies against “harmful or false content,” screenshots quickly spread across other social media platforms. BBC Verify analysis found that within just hours, these screenshots had been viewed over two million times.
The timing was critical. In the immediate aftermath of the stabbings, Merseyside Police had released minimal information, only stating shortly after 1 p.m. that “armed police have detained a male and seized a knife.” This information vacuum created fertile ground for speculation.
By 4:23 p.m., an Indian news website called Upuknews had shared Murray’s post as “confirmed” information, garnering over half a million views. Simultaneously, Paul Golding, co-leader of the far-right group Britain First and a convicted criminal, shared the screenshot claiming evidence was “stacking up that the Southport attack was carried out by a migrant,” adding another 110,000 views.
The misinformation escalated when, five hours after the attack, a completely fabricated name for the suspect—”Ali-Al-Shakati”—began circulating online alongside Murray’s screenshot. This false name was then amplified by Bernie Spofforth, an account previously suspended from X for alleged COVID misinformation, who claimed the nonexistent “Al-Shakati” was “on MI6 watch list” and “an asylum seeker who came to UK by boat last year.”
Actor and right-wing Reclaim Party leader Laurence Fox further amplified this disinformation by reposting Spofforth’s message alongside Murray’s screenshot with a call to “Close the borders.” His single post received 500,000 views.
In total, screenshots of Murray’s original LinkedIn post were viewed more than three million times on X alone. The BBC also discovered additional deleted posts from Murray that repeated the false “Al-Shakati” name, writing: “BBC news are lying. The Child murderer was from Africa. He was on MI6 watch. His name is Ali Al Shakati.”
At 5:25 p.m., police announced they had arrested a 17-year-old from Banks in Lancashire. Nearly two hours later, they clarified the suspect had been born in Cardiff, directly contradicting the false narrative. But by then, the damage was done.
A Telegram group called “Southport Wake Up,” established just six hours after the stabbings, began organizing a protest for 8 p.m. on July 30 on St. Luke’s Road—a gathering that would devolve into rioting. Far-right activists, including David Miles from the white nationalist group Patriotic Alternative, were filmed on scene as violence escalated.
Jonathan Hall KC, the government’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, later stated that the false claims circulating on social media were “plausibly connected to some of the violence that followed.” He suggested that current laws “stoke the risk of online disinformation” and has recommended legal reforms.
Media regulator Ofcom concluded there was a “clear connection” between the violent disorder and social media posts, noting how rapidly such content spread following the Southport attack. Despite this, many of the misleading posts remain visible on platforms including X and Facebook.
The UK government has committed to implementing the Online Safety Act, passed in October 2023, which requires platforms to remove illegal content and prevent deliberate misinformation. However, these protections have yet to take effect.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
14 Comments
This is a complex issue with no easy solutions. Balancing free speech with the need to limit the spread of misinformation is an ongoing challenge for platforms and policymakers.
Agreed. Striking the right balance is crucial to prevent both the suppression of legitimate speech and the amplification of falsehoods.
This is a sobering reminder of the potential consequences of misinformation. We must all be more vigilant in verifying claims and sources before sharing information, especially on sensitive topics.
The riots sparked by this misinformation are deeply concerning. We need to find ways to promote responsible and ethical use of social media to prevent such harmful outcomes in the future.
This incident underscores the importance of media literacy and fact-checking, particularly when it comes to sensitive social and political issues. We must all be more discerning consumers of information.
While the initial post was quickly removed, the damage was already done. This highlights the need for more proactive measures to identify and contain the spread of misinformation before it can have real-world consequences.
Absolutely right. Social media platforms must do more to detect and address misinformation in a timely manner.
While the initial post was quickly deleted, the damage was already done as the false information had already gone viral. This underscores the need for better controls and moderation on social media platforms to prevent the spread of misinformation.
Absolutely. Social media companies must do more to combat the rapid spread of false narratives that can incite unrest and violence.
The role of social media in shaping public discourse and fueling unrest is deeply concerning. We need to find ways to promote media literacy and responsible information sharing.
This is a tragic example of how a single false claim can spiral out of control and lead to devastating outcomes. We need to be more vigilant and critical consumers of information, especially on sensitive topics.
The role of social media in fueling unrest and violence is a complex and concerning issue. Addressing this will require a multifaceted approach involving platforms, policymakers, and the public.
This is a tragic incident that highlights the dangers of misinformation and how quickly it can spread, especially on social media. We should be cautious about jumping to conclusions and spreading unverified claims, as that can lead to harmful consequences.
It’s disheartening to see how a single unverified post can spark such a severe reaction. We must be more vigilant in checking sources and facts before sharing information, especially on sensitive topics.