Listen to the article
Trump Overstates Significance of June Budget Surplus
President Donald Trump has repeatedly highlighted the federal budget surplus recorded in June, portraying it as a rare financial achievement not seen in “many, many decades.” The president first mentioned the approximately $27 billion surplus during remarks at a White House Faith Office luncheon on July 14, appearing surprised by the news.
“And on Friday, it was announced that the United States Treasury ran a budget surplus. Is that true, Scott?” Trump asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent during the event. “In June, for the first time in many, many decades. Wow! I didn’t know that.”
Trump has since incorporated this talking point into multiple speeches, including remarks at the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit in Pittsburgh on July 15, where he told attendees: “They never saw anything like that. Everyone’s saying where did that — that’s been like decades.”
However, financial records tell a different story. The last time the federal government recorded a surplus in June specifically was in 2016 during the Obama administration – not “decades” ago as Trump claimed. More significantly, the United States has experienced several monthly budget surpluses in recent years, including as recently as April 2024, when government revenue exceeded expenditures by approximately $258 billion according to Treasury Department data.
During President Biden’s administration alone, the federal government recorded surpluses in six different months: January 2022, April 2022, April 2023, August 2023, April 2024, and September 2024.
Kent Smetters, professor of business economics and public policy at the University of Pennsylvania, explained that federal budget surpluses regularly occur in April due to Tax Day deadlines, when most Americans submit their annual income tax returns and make tax payments. Similarly, June typically sees strong revenue because it’s a month when companies and individuals file quarterly estimated tax payments, as noted by the Wall Street Journal.
This pattern is evident in historical data, with the Treasury recording four consecutive surpluses in June from 2013 to 2016. September, the final month of the third calendar quarter, has also frequently seen budget surpluses.
While Trump has attributed the June 2025 surplus to “good management and tariffs,” the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) points to a different primary factor. In its most recent Monthly Budget Review, the CBO explained that federal spending was artificially lower in June because billions of dollars in payments were shifted to May. These included disbursements for active-duty military, veterans, Supplemental Security Income, and Medicare that would normally be paid on June 1, which fell on a Sunday this year.
“If not for those timing shifts, the government would have recorded a deficit of $71 billion in June 2025,” the CBO noted.
Tariffs did contribute significantly to federal revenue in June. The government collected approximately $26.6 billion from customs duties – a dramatic 321% increase from the $6.3 billion collected in the same month last year. June marked the second consecutive month with tariff revenue exceeding $20 billion, reflecting the impact of new tariffs implemented earlier this year. The CBO recently estimated that tariffs implemented between January and May could reduce total federal deficits by $2.8 trillion over the next decade.
Despite the June surplus, the overall fiscal picture remains challenging. As of June, the United States still carried a budget deficit of more than $1.3 trillion through the first nine months of fiscal year 2025, according to Treasury Department data. This represents an increase of approximately $64 billion compared to the deficit during the same period in fiscal year 2024.
The president’s characterization of the June surplus as unprecedented overlooks both the frequency of monthly surpluses in recent years and the accounting shifts that significantly influenced this particular financial outcome.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
11 Comments
The FactCheck analysis raises some valid questions about the president’s characterization of the recent federal budget surplus. It’s a good reminder that we shouldn’t simply accept claims at face value, even from senior officials, and that it’s important to look at the full context and historical record.
The discrepancies between the president’s claims and the actual historical record highlighted in this article are noteworthy. It’s a good reminder to be skeptical of overly simplistic narratives around complex economic data and to seek out authoritative, fact-based analysis.
This is an interesting look at how the president has portrayed the recent federal budget surplus. The article provides helpful context and nuance that is important for understanding the full picture, rather than just accepting the administration’s claims at face value.
Agreed, nuance and context are key when it comes to interpreting economic data and policy. Fact-checking efforts like this help provide a more balanced and accurate understanding.
This article highlights an important discrepancy between the president’s rhetoric and the actual historical record on federal budget surpluses. It’s a good example of the value of rigorous fact-checking, which helps cut through political spin and provide a more accurate understanding of the facts.
Absolutely, fact-checking is crucial for maintaining accountability and keeping the public informed, especially on issues like economic and fiscal policy that can have significant real-world impacts.
The FactCheck analysis provides a good reality check on the president’s statements about the June budget surplus. It’s a helpful reminder to always scrutinize claims, even from high-level officials, and to seek out authoritative, impartial sources when assessing economic and fiscal data.
This analysis seems to show there are some inaccuracies in the president’s statements about the June budget surplus. It’s good to see fact-checking efforts holding leaders accountable and providing a more nuanced understanding of the data.
You make a fair point. Fact-checking is crucial, especially when it comes to important economic and fiscal issues that can have real impacts on people’s lives.
The article highlights some important facts about the federal budget surplus in June. It’s interesting to see how the president’s claims don’t quite align with the historical record. I’m curious to learn more about the factors that contributed to this surplus and what it might mean for the broader fiscal outlook.
Agreed, it’s important to examine claims around economic data like this closely and not take them at face value. The details matter in understanding the full picture.