Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Religious institutions across the United States have dramatically increased security measures following a troubling pattern of violent incidents at places of worship in recent years, according to security experts and religious leaders.

The shift toward heightened security represents a significant change for many faith communities that have traditionally emphasized openness and accessibility as core values. Now, many are reluctantly embracing measures once considered unnecessary or contradictory to their mission.

“We’ve seen a fundamental transformation in how religious organizations approach security,” said Michael Johnson, director of the Faith-Based Security Network, which advises religious institutions on safety protocols. “What was once viewed as optional has become essential for many congregations.”

The increased vigilance comes in the wake of several high-profile attacks, including the 2018 shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh that killed 11 people, the 2017 shooting at First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, where 26 people died, and numerous incidents of vandalism and threats targeting mosques nationwide.

FBI data shows that hate crimes against religious institutions increased by approximately 18% over the past five years, with incidents ranging from property damage to violent assaults. Jewish, Muslim, and Sikh communities have reported particularly significant increases in threats.

In response, many congregations have implemented comprehensive security plans. The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America reports that 85% of its member synagogues now have some form of armed security during services, compared to less than 30% a decade ago. Similarly, a survey by the Islamic Society of North America found that 72% of responding mosques have installed security cameras in the last three years.

“We never wanted to lock our doors,” said Rabbi Sarah Goldstein of Beth Shalom Congregation in Cleveland. “But the reality is that we have a responsibility to protect our community. We’ve installed bulletproof glass, security cameras, and hired guards for major services. It’s expensive and it’s sad, but it feels necessary.”

The financial burden of these security measures has proven significant for many congregations. The average mid-sized house of worship spends approximately $45,000 annually on security personnel and equipment, according to the Interfaith Security Council, a cost that strains already tight budgets.

To address this challenge, the Department of Homeland Security has expanded its Nonprofit Security Grant Program, which provided $180 million in 2023 to help at-risk nonprofits, including religious institutions, improve security. However, applications for these grants far exceed available funding, with only about 40% of requests receiving support.

Beyond physical security measures, religious leaders have also focused on training congregation members in emergency response procedures. The Catholic Diocese of Dallas recently completed a program training over 5,000 parishioners and staff in situational awareness and crisis response.

“We’re not just installing cameras and locks,” explained Imam Khalid Rashid of the Islamic Center of San Diego. “We’re creating a culture of security awareness while trying to preserve the welcoming atmosphere that defines us. It’s a difficult balance.”

Security consultants emphasize that effective protection requires more than just visible deterrents like guards or metal detectors. “The best security plan is multifaceted and constantly evolving,” noted former FBI agent Teresa Rodriguez, who now advises religious organizations. “It involves physical barriers, technology, trained personnel, and community involvement.”

Despite these challenges, religious leaders stress that maintaining open doors remains a priority. “We won’t let fear define us,” said Pastor James Williams of Grace Community Church in Atlanta. “We’re implementing security measures thoughtfully, but our primary mission remains providing spiritual refuge and community connection.”

Interfaith coalitions have emerged in many cities to share security resources and strategies. In Chicago, the Protection Across Faiths initiative brings together Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, and Sikh communities to coordinate security training and share intelligence about potential threats.

As religious institutions navigate this new reality, many leaders see the security measures as unfortunate but necessary adaptations to changing times. “Throughout history, houses of worship have always evolved to meet the needs of their communities,” noted Dr. Elizabeth Chen, professor of religious studies at Columbia University. “Today’s security challenges represent just another chapter in that ongoing adaptation.”

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. Tragic that it’s come to this, but the data speaks for itself. Kudos to the faith leaders for taking proactive steps to protect their congregations, even if it means compromising on openness.

  2. This is a troubling trend, but it’s good to see religious institutions taking proactive steps to enhance security. Places of worship should be sanctuaries, not targets for violence.

  3. Patricia Y. Jones on

    Curious to know more about the specific security measures being implemented. Are there any best practices being shared across the faith community to enhance safety while preserving an atmosphere of openness?

  4. While I understand the need for heightened security, I worry that it could have a chilling effect on attendance and participation. Religious institutions need to find creative ways to balance safety and community.

  5. Seems like a necessary but unfortunate development. I hope the security upgrades don’t make religious institutions feel too fortress-like and intimidating for worshippers. Maintaining a welcoming environment is still crucial.

  6. It’s disheartening that religious communities have to prioritize security over their core values of openness and accessibility. But the safety of congregants has to come first in these troubling times.

    • Robert Martinez on

      I agree, it’s a real dilemma. Hopefully the security measures can be implemented in a way that still preserves the welcoming spirit of these places of worship.

  7. Elijah Jackson on

    Safety and security are critical, but it’s sad to see that many congregations now feel they need to prioritize it over openness and accessibility. I hope we can find a balance.

    • Michael C. Thompson on

      I agree, the shift in priorities is concerning. But with the rise in hate crimes and attacks, religious leaders really have no choice but to take stronger security measures.

  8. William Martinez on

    Tragic that it’s come to this, but the data on the increasing number of violent incidents targeting places of worship is hard to ignore. Kudos to the religious institutions for being proactive.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.