Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In a recent incident that has drawn criticism and mockery, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth faced public scrutiny after a promotional video appeared to suggest he piloted a fighter jet, despite having no flight credentials.

The controversy began when a right-wing social media account on X (formerly Twitter) shared footage of Hegseth in an FA-18 Super Hornet, the same aircraft featured in the movie “Top Gun: Maverick.” The account enthusiastically proclaimed, “It’s settled. Pete Hegseth has to be the coolest Secretary of Defense in American history. I had no idea this guy could fly planes.”

The claim was promptly debunked by X’s Community Notes feature, which initially added a terse two-word correction: “He can’t.” The note was later expanded to clarify, “Pete Hegseth did not fly this plane or cannot fly any plane currently. He has no known flight training or certification. He was in the back seat.”

While neither Hegseth nor the Department of Defense explicitly claimed the Secretary was piloting the aircraft, critics argue the promotional material was deliberately ambiguous. The video, shared by the “Department of War” — the Department of Defense’s recently established “secondary title” under a September executive order — showed only Hegseth in the aircraft during flight sequences, without clear indication he was merely a passenger.

Former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger observed, “They really are not saying but kind of trying to imply to people that he flew it.” The aircraft was actually piloted by Lt. Commander Dillon “Bodacious” Hamrick, with the 45-year-old Secretary of Defense riding as a passenger.

Military experts have criticized the stunt as an inappropriate use of resources, particularly given ongoing U.S. military operations worldwide. Dan Grazier, senior fellow and director of the National Security Reform Program, told The Washington Post, “There are better uses of his time than in a simulator and on training flights for what is effectively a stunt. Not only are we inflicting casualties, but American troops are also in harm’s way. So I would prefer our nation’s leaders are keeping a closer eye on the ball.”

The Department of Defense did not respond to requests for comment on the matter.

This incident follows a pattern of what critics describe as Hegseth using military assets for promotional purposes. Last month, he issued a controversial directive requiring U.S. generals stationed around the world to travel to Virginia for a meeting where they listened to Hegseth and President Trump discuss topics including “warrior ethos,” beards, and physical fitness. The directive was criticized as an unusual and expensive use of military resources and personnel time.

The fighter jet controversy highlights ongoing tensions between military professionals concerned with operational readiness and effective leadership versus what some see as political appointees using the military’s prestige for personal or political gain.

The incident also underscores the increasingly important role that social media fact-checking plays in modern political discourse. Community Notes on X has become a significant tool for crowd-sourced verification of claims made by public officials and commentators, providing real-time corrections that can quickly counter misleading information.

As Secretary of Defense, Hegseth oversees the largest military in the world during a time of significant global instability, including ongoing conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, and military operations in the Caribbean mentioned in reporting about the incident. Critics suggest these publicity stunts distract from the serious responsibilities of the position at a critical geopolitical moment.

The Department of Defense has not issued any clarification about the video or responded to the criticism surrounding it.

Verify This Yourself

Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently

Reverse Image Search

Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts

Ask Our AI About This Claim

Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis

👋 Hi! I can help you understand this fact-check better. Ask me anything about this claim, related context, or how to verify similar content.

Related Fact-Checks

See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims

Loading fact-checks...

Want More Verification Tools?

Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools

14 Comments

  1. I’m curious to know more about the rationale behind this promotional video. Was it simply a tone-deaf attempt at a ‘cool’ appearance, or was there a more strategic purpose? Either way, the backlash highlights the need for better communication and transparency.

    • Good point. Regardless of the intent, the optics clearly missed the mark and ended up drawing more criticism than praise.

  2. While the ‘coolest Secretary of Defense’ claim was clearly an exaggeration, I can see why the video might have given that impression to some. Still, it’s good the Pentagon clarified the facts to avoid potential misinformation.

  3. Amelia Thompson on

    This seems like a relatively minor incident, but it highlights the need for government agencies to be very careful with their public messaging and imagery. Even slight ambiguity can be seized upon and spread online.

  4. This incident serves as a reminder that even minor public relations missteps can spiral into bigger controversies these days. The Pentagon would do well to learn from this experience and tighten up their messaging and media protocols going forward.

    • Elizabeth Rodriguez on

      Absolutely. In the age of social media and fact-checking, government agencies need to be extremely careful and deliberate with how they present information to the public.

  5. While the Pentagon chief may not have directly claimed to be piloting the jet, the video did seem to create that impression. I’m glad the fact-check was able to clarify the situation and set the record straight.

    • Ava X. Jackson on

      Agreed. Misleading visuals can be just as problematic as outright false statements, so it’s good they addressed it quickly.

  6. Elizabeth I. Jones on

    Interesting controversy around the Pentagon chief’s appearance. Seems like the promotional video was a bit misleading, even if he wasn’t explicitly claiming to be the pilot. Curious to see how this plays out and if there are any consequences.

    • Yeah, the fact-check was necessary to clear up the confusion. Transparency is important, especially for high-ranking officials.

  7. While the ‘Top Gun’ imagery may have been intended to project an image of strength and capability, it’s clear the execution fell short. The Pentagon should focus on communicating its real achievements and capabilities, rather than relying on flashy visuals that can be easily misinterpreted.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved. Designed By Sawah Solutions.