Listen to the article
The average rent in the United States has reached approximately $2,000 a month, reflecting a staggering 36% increase over just five years, according to Zillow data. A new report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) suggests that increased immigration during the Biden administration has significantly contributed to this surge in housing demand, particularly in the rental market.
HUD’s Worst Case Housing Needs 2025 Report to Congress, which analyzes data from the 2023 American Housing Survey, reveals that the foreign-born population in the United States grew by approximately six million people between 2021 and 2024. The agency characterizes this as the largest population increase over such a brief timeframe in American history.
This demographic shift has created tangible pressure on housing markets. According to HUD estimates, immigration accounted for up to 100 percent of housing demand growth in certain regions and approximately two-thirds of nationwide rental demand growth during this period. While the report examines immigration broadly, it comes as the Pew Research Center estimates the undocumented population reached about 14 million people in 2023.
The impact has been particularly pronounced in certain states. California and New York stand out as regions where immigration-driven demand has most significantly affected housing markets. Nationwide data shows the growth rate of households headed by non-citizens nearly doubled after 2019, jumping from about 7 percent between 2015 and 2019 to 13 percent between 2019 and 2023.
However, housing analysts who spoke with NPR caution against attributing the housing crisis solely to immigration. Many experts point to systemic problems that predate recent immigration trends by years or decades.
Bankrate analysis traces the origins of today’s housing shortage back to the 2007-2008 Great Recession. The housing market collapse triggered widespread bankruptcies among builders, dried up construction financing, and caused new housing starts to plummet. Critically, the construction industry never fully recovered to pre-2008 building levels, according to St. Louis Federal Reserve data.
Market experts typically consider a balanced housing market to have five to six months of available supply. Currently, the U.S. sits at approximately 3.5 months – better than pandemic lows but still significantly below healthy levels. This context suggests immigration has exacerbated rather than created a market that was already under extreme pressure due to long-term underbuilding, restrictive zoning regulations, labor shortages, and escalating construction costs.
Adding to these challenges is the growing role of institutional investors in the housing market. Realtor.com reports that investor buyers accounted for 14.8% of all home purchases in the first quarter of 2024 – the highest share since the organization began tracking this metric. Many of these properties were acquired for rental or flipping purposes, further reducing the inventory available to individual buyers and intensifying upward pressure on rents.
The resulting market dynamics have created a situation where potential homeowners find themselves priced out, rental supply continues to tighten, and housing costs climb steadily upward across both ownership and rental sectors.
HUD’s findings have intensified an already contentious debate about housing affordability in America. On one side, the data clearly shows that immigration, including undocumented migration, has measurably increased housing demand, particularly in the rental sector. On the opposing side, economists and housing advocates maintain that these demand pressures would be far less destabilizing if the United States had maintained consistent homebuilding levels over the past 15 years.
This complex interplay of factors – immigration patterns, historical construction deficits, investment trends, and regional pressures – underscores the multifaceted nature of America’s ongoing housing affordability crisis, with no single solution likely to address all dimensions of the problem.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


13 Comments
This report raises important points about the potential impact of immigration on rental costs. However, it’s critical to avoid oversimplifying the issue and consider the broader context. Housing affordability is influenced by a complex web of factors, and a nuanced, data-driven approach is needed to understand these dynamics.
Agreed. Drawing direct causal links between immigration and rental costs can be misleading. A more holistic analysis that accounts for regional variations, economic conditions, and policy decisions would provide a clearer picture of the underlying forces at play.
The surge in rental costs outlined in this report is certainly concerning. However, the role of immigration merits closer scrutiny, as there are likely many interrelated variables at play. I’d encourage a comprehensive, impartial analysis that examines the full range of economic, demographic, and policy factors influencing housing affordability.
This report raises some important questions about the relationship between immigration and housing costs. While the data seems to show a correlation, it’s crucial to examine other potential drivers as well. I’d be interested to see more granular analysis that considers regional variations and the full range of economic factors at play.
Well said. Simplistic causal links between immigration and rental costs should be avoided. A more nuanced, data-driven approach is needed to unpack the multifaceted dynamics shaping housing markets across the country.
This report highlights some significant changes in the rental market, but the role of immigration deserves further scrutiny. Housing affordability is influenced by a range of economic, demographic, and policy factors that require nuanced, evidence-based analysis. I’d be interested to see more research that examines the full scope of these dynamics.
Well said. Simplistic narratives around immigration and housing costs should be avoided. A more holistic, data-driven approach is needed to unpack the multifaceted forces shaping the rental market and inform effective policy responses.
Interesting report on the impact of immigration on rental costs. While demographic shifts can certainly influence housing demand, it’s important to consider other factors as well, like changes in income, construction, and policy. I wonder how this varies by region and what other trends are contributing to rising rents.
Good point. Regional differences and broader economic factors are crucial to understanding the full picture here. It would be helpful to see more granular data and analysis on the specific drivers behind the rental cost increases.
The rental cost increases highlighted in this report are quite substantial. I wonder how they compare to historical norms and whether there are any policy measures that could help address affordability challenges, whether related to immigration or other factors. It’s a complex issue that deserves deeper analysis.
The data presented in this report is certainly thought-provoking, but I would caution against drawing hasty conclusions. The relationship between immigration and housing costs is complex, with many other factors at play. A deeper, more comprehensive analysis would be needed to fully understand these trends and their implications.
This is a complex issue that deserves nuanced analysis. While immigration may have contributed to rising rents, other factors like limited housing supply, investor activity, and economic growth also play a role. I’d be curious to see how these dynamics vary across different markets and income levels.
Agreed, a balanced perspective is important. Isolating the impact of immigration alone can be challenging given the many interrelated forces shaping the housing market. More holistic research would help provide a clearer understanding of these trends.