Listen to the article
In a significant development at the International Criminal Court (ICC), prosecutors have presented evidence including a 1997 photograph of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte holding an assault rifle, sparking controversy over its context and relevance to the ongoing case.
The image, which shows Duterte alongside current Senator Ronald dela Rosa in Davao, was introduced during the confirmation of charges hearing by ICC Senior Trial Lawyer Julian Nicholls. Contrary to claims circulating on social media, the photograph was not presented as direct evidence of Duterte’s involvement in extrajudicial killings, but rather as background information illustrating his public persona.
“He thrives on a tough guy persona or image that he’s tried to create for himself,” Nicholls stated during the prosecution’s submission on February 23. “Riding a Harley-Davidson, shooting a semi-automatic pistol, this is the image he’s trying to create from the beginning. He likes to pose with weapons.”
The photograph, taken by photojournalist Renato Lumawag, had previously appeared in a December 2016 Reuters article with the caption: “BROTHERS IN ARMS: Mayor Rodrigo Duterte inspects the assault rifle of police officer Ronald Dela Rosa (far left) in a village in the Davao area in 1997. After becoming president earlier this year, Duterte made Dela Rosa national police chief.”
Mischaracterizations of the prosecution’s use of this image have spread rapidly online. A YouTube video posted by Pinoy Views and Opinion on February 24, which has garnered over 33,000 views, falsely claimed that prosecutors were using random internet photos as evidence of Duterte’s direct involvement in extrajudicial killings. The video’s narrator described the evidence as “garbage,” suggesting the prosecution was using any available image of “Father Digong” to tie him to the killings.
The confirmation of charges hearing against Duterte is scheduled over four days—February 23, 24, 26, and 27. This pre-trial process will determine if sufficient evidence exists to establish substantial grounds that Duterte is responsible for alleged crimes against humanity stemming from killings attributed to the Davao Death Squad and those occurring during his administration’s war on drugs.
During the first two days of the hearing, prosecutors presented witness testimonies and cited Duterte’s own public remarks admitting to having a “death squad.” They outlined how Duterte allegedly stood at the top of a command structure enforcing what they described as a state policy targeting alleged drug users and dealers, particularly among impoverished communities.
The case has become a lightning rod for misinformation in the Philippines, with numerous false claims circulating about the proceedings and their implications. The ICC’s investigation into Duterte’s alleged crimes against humanity represents one of the highest-profile cases currently before the international tribunal.
Legal experts note that the confirmation of charges hearing is a preliminary step in what could be a lengthy legal process. If the charges are confirmed, the case would proceed to a full trial where the prosecution would need to prove Duterte’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The ICC proceedings continue despite the Philippines’ withdrawal from the Rome Statute in 2019, as the alleged crimes occurred while the country was still a member. The court maintains jurisdiction over crimes committed during the period of membership.
The hearings have drawn significant international attention to the Philippines’ controversial war on drugs, which human rights organizations estimate may have resulted in thousands of deaths between 2016 and 2022.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
The image of Duterte wielding a gun is certainly provocative, but the key is understanding the full context. As the article notes, it seems to be more about his public persona than direct evidence of wrongdoing. Careful analysis is needed to separate fact from fiction in these high-profile cases.
Agreed, the details matter here. Prosecutors should focus on presenting the full, impartial facts rather than playing to perceptions.
This case highlights the complexities of assessing visual evidence, especially in a politically-charged environment. While the gun photo may grab attention, the article rightly cautions against jumping to conclusions. Maintaining objectivity and focusing on the full factual record is crucial here.
The prosecutors’ use of this photo is an interesting tactic, but I agree it needs to be evaluated carefully. Establishing Duterte’s public persona is relevant, but the real weight will come from substantive evidence of any wrongdoing. This case warrants close, impartial scrutiny.
This case demonstrates the importance of context when interpreting visual evidence. While the gun photo may be attention-grabbing, the article’s explanation of its use by prosecutors as background information, rather than direct proof, is a useful reminder to avoid rushed judgments. Rigorous, fact-based analysis is required.
The prosecutors’ strategy of using this photo to illustrate Duterte’s public image is understandable, but the real test will be in the quality of the overall evidence. Careful, impartial evaluation of all the facts is needed to reach fair conclusions in this high-profile case.
This case highlights the challenges of interpreting visual evidence, especially in a charged political climate. While the gun photo is eye-catching, the article rightly points out it’s being used more to illustrate Duterte’s public image than as direct proof. Keeping an open mind is important.
Absolutely, context is everything. Drawing hasty conclusions from a single photo could lead to distortions. A measured, fact-based approach is prudent here.