Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

The European Commission announced today it will launch a formal investigation into Meta’s handling of political advertising ahead of the upcoming European Parliament elections. The probe comes amid growing concerns that the tech giant isn’t complying with the Digital Services Act (DSA), the EU’s landmark content moderation law that took effect last year.

According to officials familiar with the matter, regulators are particularly troubled by Meta’s alleged failure to provide adequate transparency around political ads on Facebook and Instagram. The Commission cited several instances where campaign messages weren’t properly labeled or where targeting information was incomplete, potentially misleading voters about who was behind certain political messaging.

“Free and fair elections are the cornerstone of democracy,” said Margrethe Vestager, Executive Vice President of the European Commission. “We cannot allow social media platforms to undermine electoral integrity through opaque advertising practices. The DSA exists precisely to ensure transparency and accountability in the digital space.”

Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, responded to the investigation announcement by defending its political advertising policies. A company spokesperson said Meta has “invested significantly in election integrity” and maintains “the most comprehensive system for political ad transparency of any major tech platform.”

The investigation represents the first major test of the DSA’s provisions specifically related to elections. Under the law, very large online platforms like Meta’s services must maintain public repositories of political advertisements, clearly label such content, and provide detailed information about targeting parameters and spending.

Political analysts note the timing is particularly significant with European Parliament elections scheduled for June, when all 27 EU member states will vote to select representatives. The elections will shape EU policy for the next five years during a period of geopolitical tension and economic uncertainty.

“This investigation sends a strong signal to all tech platforms operating in Europe,” said Jan Penfrat, a digital rights advocate at European Digital Rights. “The Commission is showing it’s serious about enforcing the DSA, especially when it comes to protecting democratic processes.”

The formal investigation could result in significant penalties if Meta is found in violation of DSA requirements. The law allows for fines of up to 6% of a company’s global annual revenue – which in Meta’s case could amount to billions of euros.

Industry observers point out that Meta has faced similar scrutiny before. In 2018, the Cambridge Analytica scandal revealed how political consulting firms could harvest user data for targeted political advertising, leading to congressional hearings and regulatory changes in multiple countries.

The Commission has given Meta 30 days to provide preliminary information and documentation related to its political advertising practices. The investigation is expected to examine both technical compliance with the DSA and broader questions about how Meta’s algorithms amplify or suppress political content.

Digital policy experts note that this case could establish important precedents for how the DSA is enforced. “What happens with Meta will influence how other platforms approach political advertising compliance,” said Clara Herrmann, technology policy researcher at the Berlin-based Digital Society Institute. “This is about setting standards for democratic discourse in the digital age.”

The investigation comes amid broader global concerns about the impact of social media on elections. Similar regulatory efforts are underway in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Brazil, though the EU’s DSA is widely considered the most comprehensive regulatory framework addressing online content moderation and digital advertising.

Meta’s shares dipped slightly following the announcement, reflecting investor concerns about potential regulatory impacts on the company’s advertising business, which generates the vast majority of its revenue.

The Commission indicated that its investigation would proceed with urgency given the proximity to the European elections, with preliminary findings expected within three months.

Verify This Yourself

Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently

Reverse Image Search

Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts

Ask Our AI About This Claim

Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis

👋 Hi! I can help you understand this fact-check better. Ask me anything about this claim, related context, or how to verify similar content.

Related Fact-Checks

See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims

Loading fact-checks...

Want More Verification Tools?

Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools

12 Comments

  1. Patricia Lopez on

    This investigation is long overdue. Meta has evaded meaningful accountability for too long. Hoping the Commission’s findings lead to real, enforceable reforms.

    • John U. Jackson on

      Agreed. Tech giants have exploited loopholes and resisted regulation for far too long. Time for them to be held accountable and start prioritizing public interest over profits.

  2. This is an important step, but the real test will be whether it leads to real changes in how social media platforms operate. The public deserves transparency and accountability.

    • Michael R. Martinez on

      Exactly. Enforcement and follow-through will be key. The Commission needs to ensure Meta and others actually comply with the rules and make the necessary improvements.

  3. Jennifer Brown on

    While I’m glad to see the EU taking action, I wonder how effective this investigation will be. Tech companies have a history of resisting regulatory efforts. Hoping for real, substantive changes this time.

    • Michael I. Jones on

      That’s a fair concern. Big tech’s lobbying power and resistance to oversight is well documented. But the DSA seems to have some teeth, so perhaps this time will be different.

  4. Ensuring transparency in political advertising is so important for safeguarding democracy. Kudos to the Commission for taking this on. Curious to see what comes out of the investigation.

    • Michael Taylor on

      Absolutely. The public needs to be able to make informed decisions at the ballot box. Lack of transparency undermines that. Looking forward to seeing the results of this probe.

  5. Isabella White on

    I’m curious to see what the Commission uncovers in its probe. Meta’s handling of political ads has been a concern for some time now. Hoping this investigation leads to meaningful reforms.

    • Patricia Miller on

      Agreed. The findings could shed light on some concerning practices that need to be addressed. Maintaining trust in the electoral process is critical for democracy.

  6. This is an important investigation. Ensuring transparency around political advertising on social media is crucial for protecting the integrity of elections. Kudos to the EU for taking this step.

    • Absolutely. The public deserves to know who is behind the political messaging they see online. Lack of transparency can lead to disinformation and voter manipulation.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved. Designed By Sawah Solutions.