Listen to the article
Britain Defends Chagos Islands Sovereignty Transfer Amid Trump Criticism
The British government mounted a staunch defense Tuesday of its controversial decision to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, following unexpected criticism from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who had previously supported the plan through his administration.
Trump lambasted the agreement on his Truth Social platform, calling it “an act of GREAT STUPIDITY” and claiming the move demonstrates “total weakness” that Russia and China have undoubtedly noticed. He specifically mentioned Diego Garcia, home to a crucial U.S. military installation in the Indian Ocean archipelago.
“Shockingly, our ‘brilliant’ NATO Ally, the United Kingdom, is currently planning to give away the Island of Diego Garcia, the site of a vital U.S. Military Base, to Mauritius, and to do so FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER,” Trump wrote, linking the situation to his controversial statements about acquiring Greenland.
The remarks represented a significant rebuke to Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s recent diplomatic efforts. Just a day earlier, Starmer had called Trump’s Greenland comments “completely wrong” while advocating for “calm discussion” to repair strained transatlantic relations.
In May, the United Kingdom and Mauritius signed an agreement transferring control of the Chagos Islands after two centuries of British rule. The deal includes a 99-year leaseback arrangement for Diego Garcia, ensuring continued operation of the U.S. military base. When announced, the U.S. government welcomed the agreement, stating it “secures the long-term, stable, and effective operation of the joint U.S.-UK military facility.”
Cabinet Minister Darren Jones reinforced this position Tuesday, emphasizing that the agreement would “secure that military base for the next 100 years.” A government spokesperson added that “the U.K. will never compromise on our national security,” noting that the deal includes “robust provisions for keeping its unique capabilities intact and our adversaries out.”
British officials point to mounting international pressure as justification for the transfer. The United Nations and its top court have repeatedly urged Britain to return the islands to Mauritius. The government maintains the agreement protects the security of the base from potential international legal challenges that could disrupt operations.
The issue has sparked intense domestic political divisions. Opposition parties have strongly contested the deal, arguing it creates security vulnerabilities that China and Russia could exploit. Former residents of the islands, who were forcibly displaced to make way for the U.S. base, express concern about not being adequately consulted and fear the agreement may further impede their hopes of returning home.
While the legislation approving the transfer has passed the House of Commons, it faced significant resistance in the House of Lords, which approved it but simultaneously passed a “motion of regret.” The bill returned to the Commons Tuesday for further debate.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch echoed Trump’s criticisms, stating on X that Starmer’s “plan to give away the Chagos Islands is a terrible policy that weakens UK security and hands away our sovereign territory.” Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, a Trump ally, welcomed the former president’s intervention, writing: “Thank goodness Trump has vetoed the surrender of the Chagos islands.”
The strategic importance of Diego Garcia cannot be overstated. U.S. officials have described the base, which hosts approximately 2,500 personnel (primarily American), as “an all but indispensable platform” for security operations across the Middle East, South Asia, and East Africa.
The Chagos Islands have been under British control since 1814, when France ceded them. In 1965, Britain separated the territory from Mauritius, then evicted as many as 2,000 indigenous inhabitants to facilitate construction of the Diego Garcia military base.
Today, an estimated 10,000 displaced Chagossians and their descendants live primarily in Britain, Mauritius, and the Seychelles. Many have fought unsuccessfully through UK courts for decades for the right to return. The UK-Mauritius agreement does establish a resettlement fund to assist displaced islanders who wish to return to the archipelago, though Diego Garcia itself would remain off-limits.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
This seems to be another example of the tensions and shifting alliances in geopolitics. The UK and US have been close allies, but now they appear to be at odds over the future of the Chagos Islands. It will be important to monitor how this situation develops.
The potential impact on the US military base is a significant concern, but there may also be broader implications for the UK’s standing on the world stage. Curious to see how this plays out diplomatically.
The Chagos Islands dispute highlights the complexities of post-colonial territories and the competing interests of various stakeholders. It will be interesting to see how the UK, US, and Mauritius navigate this situation and find a resolution that balances their respective concerns.
Trump’s criticism of the UK’s decision is quite strong, suggesting he sees it as a significant strategic setback for the US. This could further strain the special relationship between the two countries.
This is a complex geopolitical issue with a lot of history behind it. I’m curious to learn more about the reasons and implications of the UK’s decision to hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius.
Trump’s criticism seems to be focused on the potential impact on the US military base on Diego Garcia. It will be interesting to see how this plays out diplomatically between the UK, US, and Mauritius.
The Chagos Islands are strategically important, given their location in the Indian Ocean. The US military presence on Diego Garcia is a key factor in this situation. I’m interested to see how the UK navigates this delicate diplomatic issue.
Interesting that Trump previously backed the plan to transfer the islands, and is now criticizing it. Seems like a shift in his foreign policy stance. I wonder what prompted the change of heart.
The Chagos Islands have a complicated colonial history. It’s not surprising that there are competing claims and interests at play here. Curious to see how this territorial dispute gets resolved.
Trump’s comments suggest he sees this as a national security issue for the US, given the importance of the military base on Diego Garcia. However, the UK’s decision to transfer sovereignty to Mauritius seems to be driven by other factors, such as decolonization efforts.
This is a sensitive geopolitical issue with a long history. While the UK’s decision to transfer sovereignty may be motivated by decolonization efforts, the potential impact on the US military presence is understandably a major concern for Trump and the US. It will be important to see how this situation unfolds diplomatically.