Listen to the article
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is reportedly preparing to announce both a presidential election and a referendum on a potential peace deal to end the war with Russia. According to sources cited by the Financial Times, the announcement is expected on February 24 – the fourth anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion.
Ukrainian and European officials involved in the planning told the publication that both votes could be held by May 15. This timeline appears to be influenced by American pressure, as Kyiv reportedly risks losing proposed U.S. security guarantees if it fails to conduct the votes by this deadline.
The Financial Times noted that while previous American-imposed deadlines have passed without consequences, this time Washington is applying more substantial pressure on Ukraine as the November U.S. presidential election approaches. The Trump administration is reportedly aiming to end the conflict by June, underscoring the urgency behind these diplomatic maneuvers.
Implementing these plans faces significant logistical and security challenges. Current Ukrainian martial law prohibits national elections during wartime, meaning parliament would need to amend legislation before any vote could proceed. Additionally, there remains a substantial gap between Moscow and Kyiv on critical territorial issues, including control of the Donbas region and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.
Zelenskyy has previously emphasized that election timing and format are sovereign Ukrainian matters, rejecting any suggestion that Russia could influence the process. In a series of statements posted on social media in December, he outlined two fundamental prerequisites for holding elections: security guarantees and appropriate legislation.
The Ukrainian leader has insisted that voting can only take place in Ukrainian-controlled territories and must include provisions for military personnel serving on the frontlines. He ruled out conducting elections in Russian-occupied areas due to concerns about maintaining electoral integrity.
A temporary ceasefire may be necessary to create secure conditions for either an election or referendum, Zelenskyy suggested. This would require protected airspace and the presence of international observers to ensure the votes’ legitimacy.
These developments come following recent diplomatic initiatives between the warring parties. Trilateral talks between the United States, Russia, and Ukraine were held in Abu Dhabi in early February. While the meetings produced only limited progress – primarily a 314-person prisoner exchange, the first in five months – they did establish some diplomatic channels.
U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff characterized the discussions as productive, noting that Washington and Moscow agreed to reestablish military-to-military dialogue. Witkoff described this communication channel as “crucial to achieving and maintaining peace” and indicated that trilateral discussions would continue in the coming weeks after delegations report back to their respective governments.
The potential election and referendum represent a significant diplomatic gambit by Ukraine as it navigates the complex geopolitics surrounding the conflict. While a presidential vote would allow Zelenskyy to seek re-election and reinforce his democratic mandate, the peace referendum would give Ukrainian citizens a voice in determining acceptable terms for ending the devastating war that has ravaged their country for over four years.
As these plans take shape, the international community remains focused on Ukraine’s ability to conduct meaningful democratic exercises while under the constant threat of Russian military action, and whether these initiatives might contribute to a potential resolution of Europe’s largest armed conflict since World War II.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
6 Comments
This is a high-stakes situation that could reshape the geopolitics of Eastern Europe. The proposed timeline seems very ambitious given the logistical and security challenges. Ukraine’s mineral wealth will be a key factor to watch.
From the mining and commodities angle, the outcome of any peace deal or election in Ukraine could have significant implications for global energy and mineral supply chains. Especially with uranium, lithium, and other critical resources.
Zelenskyy is in a difficult position, balancing domestic politics, international pressure, and the realities of the war. I hope any electoral process is transparent and gives Ukrainians a true voice, despite the challenging circumstances.
Interesting development in Ukraine. The proposed referendum and election raise a lot of questions – how will they be organized and secured during an active conflict? And will Russia agree to any peace deal that Ukrainians support?
This timeline seems rushed, likely driven by political considerations in the US rather than conditions on the ground. Conducting national votes amidst martial law and an ongoing invasion will be extremely challenging for Ukraine.
Agreed. Pushing for quick elections and a referendum risks undermining the democratic process and potentially dividing Ukraine further. A more gradual, inclusive approach would be better.