Listen to the article
U.S. Military Conducts Another Deadly Strike Against Suspected Drug Vessel in Pacific
The U.S. military has conducted another lethal strike against a vessel allegedly involved in drug trafficking operations in the eastern Pacific Ocean, U.S. Southern Command announced Thursday. The attack killed two people aboard the boat, which was reportedly navigating known narco-trafficking routes in the region.
In a social media post accompanied by video footage showing a boat exploding into flames, Southern Command stated the vessel “was engaged in narco-trafficking operations” at the time of the strike. The incident marks the latest in a series of maritime attacks that began in September 2025 under the Trump administration’s expanded campaign against drug trafficking.
Hours before the announcement, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed on his personal social media account that “some top cartel drug-traffickers” in the region “have decided to cease all narcotics operations INDEFINITELY due to recent (highly effective) kinetic strikes in the Caribbean.” However, neither Hegseth nor Pentagon officials provided supporting evidence or responded to requests for clarification regarding this assertion.
The frequency of these maritime strikes has noticeably decreased since January, when only one attack was recorded following the military operation that captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. This represents a significant reduction compared to December 2025, when the Pentagon conducted more than a dozen similar strikes.
With Thursday’s operation, the death toll from the administration’s anti-drug trafficking maritime campaign has risen to 128 people. According to Southern Command’s recent statement, this figure includes 116 individuals killed directly in at least 36 attacks since early September in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean. An additional 10 people are presumed dead after search operations failed to locate them following strikes.
The controversial campaign now faces legal challenges. Last week, families of two Trinidadian nationals killed in an October boat strike filed a lawsuit against the federal government, describing the attack as a war crime and part of an “unprecedented and manifestly unlawful U.S. military campaign.” This case, believed to be the first wrongful death suit stemming from these operations, will test the legal foundation of the administration’s approach, which many legal experts have criticized as a “brazen violation of the laws of armed conflict.”
President Donald Trump has defended the campaign, declaring that the United States is in “armed conflict” with drug cartels in Latin America. He has characterized the attacks as a necessary escalation in efforts to combat drug trafficking. Critics, however, point to the administration’s limited evidence supporting claims that these operations specifically target “narcoterrorists” rather than potentially innocent civilians.
The maritime strike campaign represents one of the more contentious aspects of the administration’s broader drug enforcement strategy in the Western Hemisphere. It has raised significant concerns among human rights organizations, international law experts, and governments in the region regarding due process, sovereignty, and the proportionality of military force in counter-narcotics operations.
As the death toll continues to climb and legal challenges mount, questions persist about the effectiveness, legality, and humanitarian implications of this aggressive military approach to drug interdiction. The administration maintains that these operations are critical to disrupting major drug trafficking networks that impact U.S. national security, while critics argue they may violate international law and potentially undermine regional diplomatic relationships.
U.S. officials have not disclosed whether Thursday’s operation resulted in any drug seizures or how the targeted vessel was identified as being involved in narcotics trafficking.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
Curious to see if the military’s claim about cartel operations ceasing indefinitely holds true. Drug trafficking is a complex, multi-faceted issue, so I wonder how sustainable these kinetic strikes will be in curbing the supply chain.
Good point. Temporary disruptions don’t necessarily translate to lasting impacts on the drug trade. More comprehensive strategies may be needed.
These maritime strikes against suspected drug vessels are concerning. I hope the US military is taking great care to confirm the targets and avoid unnecessary loss of life. Precision and accountability should be the top priorities.
I agree. Proper due diligence and oversight are critical when conducting these types of operations to ensure they are truly targeting illicit activities.
The US has been ramping up its efforts to disrupt drug trafficking in the Eastern Pacific. While the military may be able to disable some vessels, it’s unclear if this is an effective long-term solution to the broader drug trade challenges.
Interdicting drug trafficking operations at sea is a complex issue. While the military may be effective at kinetic strikes, I wonder if a more holistic approach focused on reducing demand and addressing root causes could be more impactful in the long run.
You raise a fair point. Addressing the larger drug trade requires a multi-pronged strategy that goes beyond just military force.
These maritime interdiction operations are high-risk and can have unintended consequences. I hope the military is exercising extreme caution and prioritizing the protection of innocent life, even as they pursue suspected traffickers.
Combating drug trafficking is an important national security priority, but I’m skeptical that military force alone is the best solution. A more balanced approach addressing demand, money laundering, and international cooperation may be more effective in the long run.
I agree, a more comprehensive strategy targeting the entire supply chain and demand side could be more impactful than isolated kinetic strikes.