Listen to the article
U.S. and European Leaders Navigate Delicate Peace Talks for Ukraine as Trump Pushes for Swift Resolution
U.S. President Donald Trump revealed Wednesday that he and European leaders have discussed proposals to end the war in Ukraine in “pretty strong terms,” while suggesting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy “has to be realistic” about his country’s position in peace negotiations.
The comments come at a critical juncture in U.S.-led efforts to broker a settlement between Ukraine and Russia, with tension mounting around Washington’s push for a swift resolution. Trump told reporters at the White House that the leaders of Germany, Britain and France had requested a meeting this weekend involving the U.S. and Ukraine.
“We’ll make a determination depending on what they come back with,” Trump said during a question-and-answer session.
Earlier, Zelenskyy announced that Ukraine was expected to submit its latest peace proposals to U.S. negotiators on Wednesday, ahead of urgent talks scheduled for Thursday with leaders and officials from approximately 30 countries supporting Kyiv’s war effort. These discussions will focus on Ukraine’s attempt to end the conflict with Russia on acceptable terms.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron emphasized in a joint statement that negotiations are at “a critical moment.” Their involvement highlights growing concerns among European allies about the direction of peace talks.
Washington’s goal of reaching a swift compromise to halt the fighting that began with Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022 has significantly reduced Ukraine’s negotiating flexibility. Zelenskyy finds himself walking a diplomatic tightrope between defending Ukrainian interests and demonstrating to Trump a willingness to compromise, even as Moscow shows no public indication of softening its demands.
Ukraine’s European allies are backing Zelenskyy’s efforts to secure a fair settlement that would deter future Russian aggression while also accommodating Europe’s defense interests. The French government confirmed that Ukraine’s allies—dubbed the Coalition of the Willing—will discuss the negotiations Thursday via video conference.
“We need to bring together 30 colleagues very quickly. And it’s not easy, but nevertheless we will do it,” Zelenskyy said late Tuesday.
According to Zelenskyy, discussions with the U.S. are focusing on a document detailing plans for Ukraine’s postwar reconstruction and economic development. Simultaneously, Ukraine is finalizing work on a separate 20-point framework for ending the war, which Kyiv expects to submit to Washington soon.
Election Proposal Adds New Dimension to Talks
After Trump called for presidential elections in Ukraine, Zelenskyy responded that his country could be ready for such a vote within three months if international partners can guarantee safe balloting during wartime and if Ukraine’s electoral laws can be modified.
This willingness to consider elections addresses Trump’s recent questioning of Ukraine’s democratic credentials. The U.S. president had suggested Zelenskyy was using the war as an excuse to avoid facing voters—comments that echo similar criticisms frequently made by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
“To hold elections, two issues must be addressed: primarily, security—how to conduct them, how to do it under strikes, under missile attacks; and a question regarding our military—how they would vote,” Zelenskyy explained. “And the second issue is the legislative framework required to ensure the legitimacy of elections.”
Zelenskyy has previously noted that elections cannot legally take place while martial law—imposed due to Russia’s invasion—remains in effect. He has also questioned how voting could be conducted when civilian areas are under bombardment and nearly 20% of Ukrainian territory is under Russian occupation.
The Ukrainian president said he has directed lawmakers from his party to prepare legislative proposals that would allow for elections while Ukraine remains under martial law. Most Ukrainians have supported Zelenskyy’s position on postponing elections and have not demanded new polls. Under current law, Zelenskyy’s continued leadership is legally valid despite his five-year term that began in 2019 having expired.
U.S. Policy Shift Toward Russia
A new U.S. national security strategy released on December 5 clearly articulates Trump’s desire to improve Washington’s relationship with Moscow and “reestablish strategic stability with Russia.” The document also portrays European allies as weak, signaling a potential shift in America’s approach to the conflict.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov praised Trump’s role in peace efforts, telling Russia’s upper house of parliament that Moscow appreciates his “commitment to dialogue.” According to Lavrov, Trump is “the only Western leader” who shows “an understanding of the reasons that made war in Ukraine inevitable.”
Trump’s peace initiatives have encountered sharply conflicting demands from Moscow and Kyiv. The initial U.S. proposal reportedly favored Russia’s position, prompting Zelenskyy to seek support from his European allies. This week, he met with the leaders of Britain, Germany, and France in London, NATO and EU officials in Brussels, and traveled to Rome for discussions with Italy’s prime minister and Pope Leo XIV.
Military Aid Declines Amid Uncertainty
Europe’s support for Ukraine remains uneven, contributing to a significant decrease in military aid since the Trump administration cut off supplies to Kyiv earlier this year unless funded by other NATO countries.
According to the Kiel Institute, which tracks international assistance to Ukraine, foreign military aid fell sharply over the summer and continued to decline through September and October. While the average annual aid between 2022 and 2024 was approximately €41.6 billion ($48.4 billion), Ukraine has received just €32.5 billion ($37.8 billion) so far this year.
Some countries have substantially increased their support: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden have all boosted their assistance, while Germany has nearly tripled its average monthly allocations. France and the UK have more than doubled their contributions.
However, other European nations have scaled back their support. Spain has recorded no new military aid for Kyiv in 2025, while Italy has reduced its already limited contributions by 15% compared to 2022-2024 levels.
As peace talks progress, the disparities in international support and the fundamental differences between Ukrainian and Russian positions underscore the complexity of finding a resolution that can satisfy all parties involved in this protracted conflict.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
This is a critical moment for the peace process, and the revised proposals from Ukraine will be closely scrutinized. I’m curious to see how they aim to address some of the key sticking points, such as the status of Crimea and the Donbas region.
Those territorial issues will be especially tricky to resolve. Any peace deal will need to find a way to balance Ukraine’s sovereignty with Russia’s security concerns in a mutually acceptable way.
It’s encouraging to see Ukraine taking a proactive approach and submitting its latest proposals ahead of the upcoming talks. This shows a commitment to finding a negotiated solution, even if the path forward remains challenging. I hope the discussions can foster a constructive dialogue between all parties.
Absolutely. The willingness to engage in substantive negotiations is a positive sign, though the ultimate outcome will depend on the flexibility and compromises made by each side.
It’s encouraging to see Ukraine taking a proactive approach and submitting its latest peace proposals ahead of the upcoming talks. This shows a commitment to finding a negotiated solution, even if the path forward remains challenging. I hope the discussions can foster a constructive dialogue between all parties and lead to a durable resolution.
I agree, the willingness to engage in substantive negotiations is a positive sign. However, the ultimate outcome will depend on the flexibility and compromises made by each side. It will be a delicate balancing act, but one that is necessary for achieving a lasting peace.
Interesting to see Ukraine revising its peace plans to present to the US. Securing a lasting resolution to the conflict will require delicate negotiations between all parties involved. I’m curious to hear more about the specific proposals and how they aim to address the complex dynamics at play.
Indeed, finding an acceptable compromise will be challenging given the high stakes and divergent interests. Ukraine will need to balance its own security needs with the political realities it faces.
The mining and energy sectors will undoubtedly be watching these developments closely, as a resolution to the conflict could have significant implications for global commodity markets and supply chains. I wonder how the revised peace plans might address some of these economic dimensions.
That’s a good point. The economic fallout from the war has been significant, so any peace deal will need to carefully consider the impacts on critical industries like mining and energy. Balancing these factors will be crucial.
The dynamics around this conflict are incredibly complex, with competing interests and priorities at play. It will be interesting to see how the revised peace plans from Ukraine attempt to balance these various factors and chart a path towards a sustainable resolution.
You’re right, the complexity is daunting. Ukraine will need to carefully navigate the interests of the US, Europe, and Russia in order to find a compromise that addresses its own security concerns.
This is a critical juncture for the peace process. Ukraine’s revised proposals will likely reflect its evolving strategic position and priorities. It will be important to see how they align with the goals of the US and its European allies in seeking a swift but durable resolution.
You’re right, the timing is crucial. The upcoming talks will be an important test of the various parties’ willingness to make the necessary concessions for progress.
The mining and energy sectors will be closely watching these developments, as a resolution to the conflict could have significant implications for global commodity markets and supply chains. I wonder how the revised peace plans might address some of the economic dimensions of the war.
Good point. The economic consequences of the war have been far-reaching, so any peace deal will need to consider the impacts on critical industries like mining and energy.