Listen to the article
Trump Administration Reports 100 Foreign Policy Achievements in First Year
A new report released Wednesday by Polaris National Security outlines what it describes as 100 foreign policy achievements by President Donald Trump’s administration since returning to office in January. The document, titled “100 Trump Foreign Policy Wins From 2025 the Media Wants You to Miss,” chronicles major foreign policy moves implemented over the past year.
“Since January, the Trump administration has moved with historic pace to restore America’s strength and security,” the report states, highlighting an approach centered on deterrence, alliance burden-sharing, and direct engagement with adversaries.
Cale Brown, chair of Polaris National Security and former State Department principal deputy spokesperson, characterized the administration’s approach as a decisive reset on the global stage. “President Trump has taken the world stage by storm, reasserting American strength after four years of weakness,” he said.
Western Hemisphere Focus and Venezuela Policy
A significant portion of the report details the administration’s strategy in the Western Hemisphere, particularly regarding Venezuela. It highlights Operation Southern Spear, which expanded counter-narcotics operations off Venezuela’s coast, including airstrikes against maritime vessels reportedly linked to organizations such as Tren de Aragua and the National Liberation Army. The campaign is described as defending American communities from drug trafficking.
The administration also increased the reward for information leading to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s arrest to $50 million, with Attorney General Pam Bondi publicly accusing Maduro of involvement in narcotics trafficking—allegations Venezuela has firmly rejected.
The report frames these actions as part of the 2025 National Security Strategy, calling it “the most significant hemispheric reorientation of U.S. foreign policy in decades.”
Gaza Ceasefire and Middle East Diplomacy
The October Gaza ceasefire agreement is highlighted as a major diplomatic breakthrough. According to the document, the agreement “secured an immediate ceasefire and the return of all surviving hostages,” including Americans, with one hostage reportedly still unaccounted for. The agreement also outlines plans for prisoner exchanges, Gaza’s demilitarization, an international stabilization force, transitional governance, and reconstruction initiatives.
The report also notes a November U.N. Security Council vote in which a U.S.-led Gaza resolution passed 13-0, with Russia and China abstaining. This resolution reportedly provides “an international legal framework for the next phase of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire.”
Additionally, the administration’s decision to prohibit U.S. taxpayer funding for UNRWA is mentioned, citing concerns over alleged ties between some personnel and Hamas—a charge UNRWA denies at the institutional level.
Iran Strategy and Military Action
One of the most significant actions detailed in the report involves U.S. military strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities in June, conducted using B-2 bombers and bunker-buster munitions. The report frames these operations as demonstrating that the United States “will not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran,” though Iran consistently denies pursuing a military nuclear program.
Nathan Sales, a distinguished fellow at the Atlantic Council and former State Department counterterrorism coordinator, said the administration views regional diplomacy primarily through countering Tehran. “The Trump administration gets that the Iranian regime is the fundamental source of violence and instability across the Middle East,” Sales noted.
NATO and European Security
The report points to commitments secured at the NATO summit in The Hague, where alliance members pledged to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035—significantly higher than the longstanding 2% benchmark. This commitment allegedly followed sustained U.S. pressure for “fairer burden-sharing among allied nations.”
Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Agreement
In August, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan signed an agreement at the White House aimed at ending the decades-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The declaration includes commitments on border security, regional transit routes, and economic cooperation with U.S. involvement.
Mixed Assessment from Analysts
Foreign policy analyst and editor-in-chief of the Foreign Desk Lisa Daftari offered a more nuanced view of the administration’s record, noting that while Trump has delivered on several strategic priorities, other moves warrant scrutiny.
“This record is tempered by concerning diplomatic overtures that urge caution,” Daftari said, pointing to the administration’s characterization of Syria’s president and its approach to Turkey and Saudi Arabia as potentially premature extensions of trust that “may exceed what these relationships warrant.”
Daftari suggested the true measure of the administration’s foreign policy doctrine would ultimately depend on how these relationships and decisions unfold in the coming year.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
The report highlights some significant moves, but I’d want to understand more about the nuances and consequences, both positive and negative, for the mining and energy sectors.
Absolutely, the devil is often in the details when it comes to complex policy changes. Careful evaluation of outcomes is key.
The report highlights some significant foreign policy moves, but I’d want to see independent analysis on how they’re impacting industries like mining, metals, and energy in practice.
The focus on the Western Hemisphere and issues like Venezuela are certainly notable. I wonder how these policies have affected the mining and energy industries operating in that part of the world.
Agreed, the geopolitical dynamics in the region are complex. Cartel activity and political instability can create challenges for resource companies trying to operate there.
This is an interesting development, but I remain somewhat skeptical of claims of ‘100 policy wins’ without more detailed, impartial analysis. The impacts on mining, energy and other industries warrant close scrutiny.
While the administration touts these policy achievements, I think it’s important to assess them objectively, especially in terms of how they affect key industries like mining, commodities, and energy.
Agreed, a balanced perspective is needed. The real-world implications for businesses operating in these sectors should be the focus.
Interesting to see the administration’s reported foreign policy achievements, especially around cartel enforcement and peace deals. I’d be curious to learn more about how these policies have impacted the mining and energy sectors in the region.
Yes, the details on Venezuela policy are particularly noteworthy. Stronger enforcement against cartels could have ripple effects on commodity supply chains in Latin America.
100 policy wins is an ambitious claim. I’d be interested to see more objective analysis on the real-world impacts, especially in industries like mining, oil and gas.