Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

South Korea’s former President Yoon Suk Yeol was indicted Friday on allegations that he and others attempted to interfere with an investigation into a marine’s death during a 2023 flood rescue operation, adding another criminal case to the growing list against the ousted leader.

Prosecutors allege that Yoon, his former defense minister, and 10 other officials abused their power by pressuring investigators to alter a report about the drowning of Corporal Chae Su-geun, who died while participating in search-and-rescue efforts for flood victims last year.

According to assistant special counsel Choung Min-young, the marine corps’ initial investigation held a division commander and seven others responsible for Chae’s death. However, Yoon reportedly became furious about the commander’s inclusion in the report and directed top presidential and Defense Ministry officials to pressure the marine corps to revise their findings to exclude the commander.

“The investigation was conducted in line with law and principle, but Yoon and other indicted officials systemically committed abuse of power that undermined fairness and independence of the marine corps’ investigation team,” Choung told reporters at a briefing.

When Park Jung-hun, who headed the marine corps’ investigation team, refused to bow to pressure and sent the original report to police, Yoon allegedly ordered officials to retrieve the report. Prosecutors claim the former president also directed that Park be dismissed from his position and investigated on insubordination charges.

This indictment marks the third major criminal case against Yoon, who was removed from office earlier this year following his unprecedented December 3 martial law decree that thrust South Korea into political turmoil. His removal represented one of the most dramatic political downfalls in South Korea’s modern history.

Yoon is currently in jail awaiting the outcome of his ongoing trial on rebellion charges, which could result in severe penalties including life imprisonment or even capital punishment if he is convicted. A verdict in that case is expected early next year.

Earlier this month, Yoon faced additional charges alleging he ordered drone flights over North Korea with the deliberate intention of escalating military tensions to justify his martial law declaration.

The cascade of legal troubles for the former president began shortly after current President Lee Jae Myung took office in June. Lee appointed three independent counsels to investigate various allegations against Yoon, his wife, and his associates.

South Korea has a history of prosecuting former leaders once they leave office. Several former presidents have faced legal consequences after their terms ended, reflecting the country’s complex relationship between political power and judicial accountability.

The indictment highlights ongoing tensions within South Korea’s political landscape and raises questions about military oversight and accountability in the country. The case involving Corporal Chae has particular resonance as it touches on both military operations and disaster response during what was one of South Korea’s deadliest flooding events in recent years.

Yoon, who is currently detained, has not yet commented on this latest indictment, though reports indicate he has previously denied the allegations related to the marine corps investigation.

The case will likely proceed to trial in the coming months, adding to the former president’s mounting legal challenges as he faces multiple serious criminal charges that could determine not only his political future but potentially his personal freedom as well.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

7 Comments

  1. Michael Johnson on

    It’s important that the military and law enforcement maintain their independence and are able to conduct fair and thorough investigations without political interference. This case raises concerning questions about potential misconduct at the highest levels.

  2. This is a troubling allegation that, if proven true, would represent a grave violation of democratic norms and the rule of law. Robust checks and balances are needed to prevent such abuses of power.

    • Absolutely. Independent oversight and strong institutions are crucial safeguards against government overreach and the politicization of sensitive investigations.

  3. This is a concerning development. If the allegations are true, it’s troubling to see a former president allegedly interfering with an investigation into a tragic military death. Transparency and accountability are critical in such cases.

  4. Patricia Martin on

    Manipulating investigations to shield officials from responsibility is a serious abuse of power. The marine’s family deserves a full and impartial inquiry into the circumstances surrounding his death.

    • Agreed. Authorities must ensure the integrity of such investigations, regardless of the political implications. The public interest should be the top priority.

  5. The public deserves to know the full truth about this tragic incident and any attempts to obstruct the investigation. Transparency and accountability must be the guiding principles here.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.