Listen to the article
Myanmar’s Military-Backed Party Wins Election Amid Questions About Future Leadership
Myanmar’s military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) has officially won the country’s controversial election, according to final results released Wednesday. The victory comes as the nation’s military chief, Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, signed into law a new consultative body that could allow him to maintain influence even without formally leading the new government.
The USDP, led by former generals, secured 339 of the 586 parliamentary seats. When combined with the 166 seats automatically allocated to military appointees under the constitution, pro-military forces will control approximately 86% of the legislature, effectively cementing military rule in the Southeast Asian nation.
The election outcome was widely anticipated after major opposition parties were excluded from participating and dissent was heavily restricted. The three-phase voting process took place in December and January but only covered 263 of the country’s 330 townships, with about one-fifth of areas unable to vote due to ongoing armed conflict.
Min Aung Hlaing claimed the USDP won more than 44% of the nationwide vote, with over 13 million voters—approximately 54% of the eligible 24 million—casting ballots. He characterized this as “enthusiastic participation,” according to state-run newspaper Myanma Alinn. The general also announced that Parliament will convene in the third week of March to elect a new president.
The creation of the new Union Consultative Council raises questions about Myanmar’s future leadership structure. The body will advise on matters including national security, international relations, peace processes, and legislation. Under the new law, the incoming president can form the council with at least five members, including a chairman, without affecting executive or judicial powers.
Analysts suggest this structure could provide Min Aung Hlaing a pathway to retain significant influence while potentially relinquishing his formal military title. The constitution bars a president from simultaneously serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces—the country’s most powerful position—creating a dilemma for the general who seized power in 2021.
“This new council reflects the military’s consistent strategy of creating parallel governance structures to maintain control while giving the appearance of civilian rule,” said a regional security analyst who requested anonymity due to the sensitive nature of Myanmar politics. “It’s another layer in the complex web of power that the military has constructed since the coup.”
The 2021 military takeover deposed the democratically elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi, plunging Myanmar into widespread unrest and armed resistance that has since evolved into a multi-front civil war. The fighting has displaced millions internally and sent hundreds of thousands fleeing to neighboring countries.
United Nations human rights chief Volker Türk condemned the recent election, stating it “failed to respect fundamental rights” and only served to “exacerbate violence and societal polarization.” In a statement released Friday marking the coup’s anniversary, Türk cited reports of voter coercion nationwide, including fears of forced conscription, restricted food access, and administrative penalties.
“For five years now, the military’s rule has been characterized by repression of political dissent, mass arbitrary arrests, arbitrary conscription, widespread surveillance and limitation of civic space,” Türk said. “Now, the military is seeking to entrench its rule-by-violence after forcing people to the ballot box. This couldn’t be further from civilian rule.”
The situation in Myanmar continues to draw international concern, particularly as fighting intensifies between the military and multiple armed resistance groups and ethnic armies. Meanwhile, the country faces a deteriorating humanitarian crisis, with more than 18 million people in need of assistance according to UN estimates.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
The exclusion of major opposition parties and restrictions on dissent make it difficult to view this election as truly free and fair. Myanmar’s path to democracy remains uncertain.
I’m curious to see how the international community responds to these election results and the military’s continued consolidation of power. Robust diplomatic pressure may be needed to push for reforms.
With the military securing such a dominant position, it’s unclear whether this election will lead to any meaningful changes in Myanmar’s political landscape. Significant challenges remain for the country’s democratic development.
The military’s creation of a new consultative body suggests an attempt to maintain influence even without formally leading the government. This raises concerns about the sincerity of any future democratic transitions.
This election outcome is a significant setback for Myanmar’s democratic aspirations. The military’s firm grip on power appears to remain unshaken, despite international calls for reform.
The exclusion of major opposition parties and the military’s creation of a new consultative body suggest that the ruling regime is more interested in maintaining control than in fostering genuine democratic progress.
This election outcome seems to reinforce the military’s grip on power in Myanmar. It will be interesting to see how the new consultative body impacts the country’s political dynamics going forward.
The military’s tight control over the election process raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of these results. Meaningful democratic reforms appear to remain elusive in Myanmar.
The military’s continued control over Myanmar’s political process is deeply troubling. Free and fair elections are essential for any meaningful progress toward democracy in the country.
Given the military’s dominance, I’m skeptical that this election will result in significant changes to the power structure in Myanmar. Sustained international pressure may be required to push for democratic reforms.