Listen to the article
Lawmakers in China’s casino hub of Macao unanimously approved legislation Thursday that will allow trials to be conducted behind closed doors when authorities determine that public proceedings could threaten national security.
The new law grants expanded powers to Macao’s national security committee and represents what critics see as part of a broader pattern of tightening control over political expression in China’s special administrative regions.
Under the legislation, cases can be heard privately if both judges and the city’s national security committee conclude that public hearings might compromise national security interests. Additionally, attorneys seeking to participate in national security-related proceedings will need approval from designated judges, with the committee reviewing their applications.
The national security committee, currently composed of security officials, police chiefs, and the city’s leader, will now expand to include a wider array of government representatives, including officials overseeing cultural affairs, education, and youth development. The committee’s mandate includes studying how to implement security policies directed by Beijing.
The Macao government praised the legislation as having “great significance for effectively safeguarding national sovereignty, security and development interests.” The law will take effect the day after its publication in the official gazette.
The provision allowing for closed criminal trials has raised concerns among observers, particularly following last year’s detention of former pro-democracy lawmaker Au Kam San. Authorities accused Au of colluding with outside forces in violation of the territory’s national security law—the first publicly known case since the legislation was enacted in 2009 and subsequently revised in 2023.
Macao, a former Portuguese colony that returned to Chinese rule in 1999, has transformed from a gambling enclave dominated by monopolies into one of the world’s premier gaming destinations. The city generates billions in tax revenue from its casino industry, which has attracted major international operators including Las Vegas Sands, MGM Resorts, and Wynn Resorts.
Unlike neighboring Hong Kong, Macao never developed a robust pro-democracy movement. The former British colony of Hong Kong, which returned to China in 1997, experienced massive anti-government protests in 2019 that posed the most significant challenge to Beijing’s authority since the handover. By comparison, Macao has seen relatively few political demonstrations challenging government control.
Nevertheless, political restrictions have intensified in Macao in recent years, particularly after the Hong Kong protests prompted Beijing to implement a sweeping national security law there in 2020. Analysts note that authorities appear to be standardizing security measures across both special administrative regions despite their different political histories.
The legislation reflects China’s growing emphasis on national security across all territories under its control. Legal experts have pointed out that the vague definition of what constitutes a national security threat provides authorities with significant discretion in applying these measures.
Regional observers suggest the law further aligns Macao’s judicial system with mainland China’s approach, where closed-door trials for sensitive cases are common practice. International human rights organizations have expressed concern that such provisions could potentially undermine judicial transparency and due process.
The gaming industry, which forms the backbone of Macao’s economy, has thus far shown little public reaction to the new security measures. Casino operators have generally maintained positive relationships with local authorities while navigating the increasingly complex regulatory environment.
As Macao implements these enhanced security measures, it continues to balance its role as an international tourism and gaming destination with Beijing’s priorities regarding national sovereignty and security.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
6 Comments
This is an interesting development in Macao’s legal system. It will be important to monitor whether this law is applied fairly or if it becomes a tool for political repression.
I’m curious to see how this law will be applied in practice. Will there be sufficient oversight to ensure it’s not misused? Transparency around the national security committee’s decision-making will be key.
While national security is important, these kinds of laws can also be abused to suppress dissent and criticism. The government will need to be very careful in how it implements this new legislation.
This new national security law in Macao raises concerns about judicial transparency and the balance between security and civil liberties. Closed-door trials could make it harder to ensure fair and impartial proceedings.
The expansion of the national security committee’s mandate to cover areas like culture and education is interesting. It suggests the government wants to tighten control over various aspects of society, not just security matters.
You’re right, this appears to be part of a broader trend of increasing control and surveillance in China’s special administrative regions like Macao and Hong Kong.