Listen to the article
A federal immigration judge has halted the deportation of Mohsen Mahdawi, a Palestinian graduate student who organized protests at Columbia University against Israel’s military actions in Gaza, dealing another blow to the Trump administration’s efforts to remove pro-Palestinian activists from the United States.
Judge Nina Froes terminated the case due to a procedural error by government attorneys, who failed to properly certify an official document they planned to use as evidence, according to the ruling made public on Tuesday.
This marks the second recent setback for the administration’s campaign targeting campus activists critical of Israel. Last month, a different immigration judge blocked the deportation of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University graduate student who had written an op-ed criticizing her school’s response to the Gaza conflict.
Mahdawi, who was born in a refugee camp in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has been a legal permanent resident in the United States for a decade. His case attracted significant attention when immigration agents arrested him during what was supposed to be a routine citizenship interview in April. A federal judge ordered his release two weeks later.
Despite his release, the government pursued deportation proceedings against Mahdawi based on a memo from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, which claimed that noncitizens could be expelled if their presence might undermine U.S. foreign policy interests. The judge’s ruling hinged on the government’s failure to properly authenticate this key document according to federal requirements.
“I am grateful to the court for honoring the rule of law and holding the line against the government’s attempts to trample on due process,” Mahdawi said in a statement released through his attorneys. “This decision is an important step towards upholding what fear tried to destroy: the right to speak for peace and justice.”
The government, however, appears determined to continue its efforts. Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, characterized Mahdawi as a leader of “pro-terrorist riots” whose visa should be revoked, adding defiantly, “No activist judge, not this one or any other, is going to stop us from doing that.”
The case unfolds against the backdrop of heightened tensions on American college campuses, where protests against Israel’s military campaign in Gaza have led to hundreds of arrests nationwide. Civil liberties advocates have raised concerns about the targeting of foreign students and residents for their political speech, arguing it represents an unconstitutional attempt to silence criticism of U.S. foreign policy.
Legal experts note that the judge’s ruling focused narrowly on procedural grounds rather than addressing the broader constitutional questions about free speech and political expression. The government could potentially appeal the decision or attempt to restart deportation proceedings with properly certified documentation.
Mahdawi’s legal battle continues on another front as well. His attorneys confirmed that he has filed a separate case in federal district court challenging the lawfulness of his initial detention, which remains ongoing.
The case highlights the increasingly complicated intersection of immigration enforcement, foreign policy, and constitutional protections for political speech. Critics of the administration’s approach argue that using immigration status as leverage against political activists creates a chilling effect on campus discourse, particularly for international students who may fear similar reprisals.
Supporters of the government’s position maintain that foreign nationals engaged in disruptive protests should not be entitled to the same protections as citizens, particularly when their activities touch on sensitive foreign policy matters.
The Trump administration has not yet announced whether it plans to appeal Judge Froes’s ruling or pursue alternative means to revoke Mahdawi’s residency status.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This decision is a win for free speech and the rights of permanent residents. Activists shouldn’t face deportation simply for organizing protests, even on controversial topics. Hopefully this sets a precedent for protecting the rights of non-citizens.
This is an interesting case that highlights tensions around free speech, immigration policy, and geopolitical conflicts. While I don’t have a strong opinion, I hope the courts can carefully balance all the relevant factors and ensure a just outcome.
This is a complex issue at the intersection of immigration, free speech, and geopolitics. While I don’t have a definitive view, I hope the courts can carefully weigh all the evidence and ensure the student’s rights are protected, regardless of his political views.
As a mining and energy enthusiast, I don’t have direct expertise on this case. But in general, I believe the immigration system should be fair and evenhanded, not used as a political weapon. Deporting someone over a ‘procedural error’ raises red flags.
You make a fair point. The immigration process should be transparent and consistently applied, not arbitrarily used against activists. Even if one disagrees with the student’s views, his rights as a permanent resident must be respected.
As someone interested in the energy and mining sectors, I don’t have direct expertise on immigration law. But in general, I believe the system should be fair and impartial, not used as a tool for political targeting. This case raises concerning questions that deserve scrutiny.
This is a concerning case of potential political persecution. It’s important that due process and the rule of law are upheld, regardless of one’s views. I hope this student receives a fair hearing and that his rights as a permanent resident are protected.
I agree, the administration’s targeting of campus activists critical of Israel is troubling. The courts should carefully scrutinize these cases to ensure no one is being unfairly targeted for their political views.