Listen to the article
Italian Antitrust Authority Slaps Apple with €98.6 Million Fine Over Privacy Feature
Italian regulators have imposed a hefty €98.6 million ($116 million) fine on Apple for allegedly restricting App Store competition through its App Tracking Transparency (ATT) feature. The tech giant has vowed to appeal the decision.
According to Italy’s antitrust authority, Apple abused its dominant market position by requiring third-party app developers to obtain user consent twice to comply with European privacy regulations when implementing ATT. The feature, introduced in April 2021, requires apps to ask users for permission before collecting data for targeted advertising.
“As a result, such double consent requirement is harmful to developers, whose business model relies on the sale of advertising space, as well as to advertisers and advertising intermediation platforms,” the Italian authority stated in its announcement. Regulators described the double consent requirement as “disproportionate” to Apple’s stated goal of protecting user data.
The ruling doesn’t challenge the privacy feature itself but rather how Apple implemented it. Critics have long argued that ATT, while ostensibly designed to enhance user privacy, creates additional hurdles for smaller app developers who rely heavily on advertising revenue to remain financially viable without charging consumers directly.
Apple strongly rejected the findings in a statement, defending its privacy-focused approach: “At Apple, we believe privacy is a fundamental human right, and we created App Tracking Transparency to give users a simple way to control whether companies can track their activity across other apps and websites.” The company emphasized that these rules “apply equally to all developers, including Apple,” and have received praise from privacy advocates and data protection authorities globally.
This Italian ruling follows a similar action by French regulators, who fined Apple €150 million ($162 million) in March over the same consent feature. The mounting regulatory challenges reflect growing European scrutiny of how tech giants implement privacy controls while maintaining fair competition.
Industry analysts note that Apple’s privacy changes have significantly impacted the digital advertising ecosystem. When ATT launched, companies like Meta (formerly Facebook) warned that the feature would harm small businesses reliant on targeted advertising. According to some estimates, the changes have cost social media platforms billions in advertising revenue as tracking capabilities became more limited.
The clash highlights the ongoing tension between privacy protection and competition concerns in the digital marketplace. While consumers and privacy advocates have generally welcomed Apple’s stronger privacy controls, advertising-dependent businesses argue these measures disproportionately benefit Apple’s own advertising services while restricting others.
For app developers, particularly smaller ones, navigating these changing requirements has proven challenging. Many have had to restructure their business models, either by introducing subscription features or finding alternative revenue sources as traditional advertising effectiveness diminished under the new privacy regime.
The Italian ruling also comes amid broader European Union efforts to regulate big tech companies through legislation like the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act, which aim to curb anti-competitive practices and increase transparency in digital markets.
Apple, headquartered in Cupertino, California, has consistently defended its privacy features as beneficial to users rather than anticompetitive. The company’s appeal process could take months or years to resolve, during which time the regulatory landscape may continue to evolve.
As digital privacy concerns grow globally, this case represents just one battle in the larger struggle between technology companies, regulators, and advertisers over who controls user data and how it can be monetized in the digital economy.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
Interesting to see the Italian antitrust agency take on Apple over their privacy feature. It’s a complex issue balancing user privacy and app developer needs. I’m curious to see how Apple’s appeal unfolds.
Yes, it’s a delicate balance. Regulators want to ensure fair competition, but Apple is arguing their feature is about user privacy. Should be an interesting legal battle.
€98.6 million is a hefty fine for Apple. I can understand the regulator’s view that the double consent requirement was disproportionate, even if the privacy feature itself is reasonable. Curious to see Apple’s defense in the appeal.
Absolutely, the fine shows how seriously the Italian authorities are taking this issue. Apple will need to make a strong case that their implementation was fair and necessary for user privacy.
The interplay between privacy, competition, and platform power is an ongoing challenge for regulators worldwide. It will be interesting to see if the Italian decision stands or if Apple can convince the courts their approach was justified.
This is an important precedent for how privacy regulations are applied to dominant tech platforms. The Italian regulator seems to be saying Apple went too far in restricting competition, even if the goal was protecting user data. A nuanced issue for sure.
Apple’s privacy feature has certainly shaken up the digital advertising ecosystem. While user privacy is important, it seems the Italian regulator found Apple’s implementation too restrictive. I wonder if a middle ground can be found.
That’s a good point. Striking the right balance between privacy protections and enabling a healthy ad-supported app ecosystem will be key. Apple may need to refine their approach.