Listen to the article
A traditionalist Catholic group, the Priestly Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), has threatened to break fully with the Vatican by announcing plans to consecrate new bishops without papal approval on July 1, escalating decades of tensions between the conservative organization and Rome.
The society, which exclusively celebrates the Traditional Latin Mass, has been at odds with the Vatican since the reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s. SSPX superior general Father Davide Pagliarani said the group requested an audience with Pope Leo XIV in August to discuss the appointment of new bishops but claims the Vatican’s response “does not in any way respond to our requests.”
Currently, SSPX has only two serving bishops: Bishop Bernard Fellay, a former superior general, and Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta. The society’s founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, was excommunicated in 1988 by Pope John Paul II after ordaining four bishops without Vatican approval. Those bishops were also excommunicated.
The current standoff risks repeating that 1988 schism, which created one of the most significant rifts within the Catholic Church in recent decades. Despite this history, Pagliarani has insisted that the society does not seek separation from the Vatican.
“The Society of Saint Pius X does not seek first and foremost its own survival: it seeks primarily the good of the universal Church,” Pagliarani stated in November 2024, the 50th anniversary of SSPX’s founding.
Relations between the traditionalist group and the Vatican have fluctuated over the years. Pope Benedict XVI made conciliatory moves in 2009 by remitting the excommunications for Lefebvre and his four bishops, though this did not grant them full ministry within the Church.
Pope Francis continued these reconciliation efforts by allowing SSPX priests to hear confessions and conduct marriages, significant pastoral concessions. However, the pontiff maintained that the society would not have an official ministry until they fully accepted the reforms established by Vatican II – a condition the group has consistently resisted.
The Catholic Herald reported that SSPX had been in discussions with the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith throughout last year, suggesting that Monday’s announcement indicates a breakdown in these negotiations.
This development comes at a sensitive time for the Catholic Church, which has been navigating tensions between traditionalists and progressives in recent years. Pope Leo XIV’s papacy has continued to face the challenge of maintaining unity while addressing the concerns of various factions within the global Catholic community.
The SSPX controversy touches on fundamental questions about authority, tradition, and change within Catholicism. For traditionalists, the group represents a commitment to preserving ancient liturgical practices and theological positions. Critics, however, view their rejection of Vatican II reforms as undermining papal authority and Church unity.
The unauthorized consecration of bishops is particularly significant in Catholic ecclesiology, as bishops represent a direct link in apostolic succession – the unbroken line of authority traced back to the original apostles. When performed without Vatican approval, such consecrations challenge the hierarchical structure of the Church.
If SSPX proceeds with the consecrations on July 1 as planned, it could trigger a formal schism and potentially new excommunications, further fracturing an already divided Catholic community. The Vatican has not yet issued a formal response to the SSPX announcement.
Religious observers note that this situation reflects broader tensions in many faith traditions between preserving tradition and adapting to contemporary circumstances – a balance that religious institutions worldwide continue to negotiate in an increasingly polarized society.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
The SSPX’s traditionalist beliefs are understandable, but ordaining bishops unilaterally seems an overly confrontational approach. I hope cooler heads prevail and both sides can reach an agreement that respects the authority of the Vatican while accommodating the SSPX’s liturgical preferences.
Tensions between reformist and traditionalist factions have plagued the Catholic Church for decades. This latest standoff highlights the challenges the Vatican faces in maintaining unity amidst such divergent theological views.
The SSPX’s proposed actions seem like an overreaction that could significantly damage relations with the Vatican. While their traditional liturgical preferences are valid, ordaining bishops without approval is a provocative step that is unlikely to end well. Both sides should prioritize dialogue and compromise.
Agreed. The Catholic Church has weathered schisms in the past, but this latest dispute could prove especially divisive if not handled carefully. I hope the SSPX and Vatican can find a path forward that respects the concerns of traditionalists while maintaining ecclesial unity.
This potential schism is unfortunate, but not entirely surprising given the SSPX’s long history of disagreement with Vatican reforms. I’m curious to see if Pope Leo XIV can broker a compromise that satisfies the SSPX’s concerns without undermining the authority of the Holy See.
The SSPX’s insistence on the Traditional Latin Mass is understandable, but acting unilaterally to ordain bishops risks further dividing the Church. I hope the Vatican can engage constructively to find a resolution that preserves unity.
This potential schism is concerning, as it risks further fragmenting the Catholic Church. While the SSPX’s adherence to traditional liturgy is understandable, unilaterally ordaining bishops without Vatican approval is an extreme measure that could have serious consequences. I hope both sides can engage in good-faith dialogue to resolve this dispute.
This potential schism is certainly concerning for the Catholic Church. While the SSPX has legitimate grievances, unilaterally ordaining bishops without Vatican approval could further strain relations and create a damaging rift. Both sides should exercise restraint and seek a diplomatic resolution, if possible.
Agreed. The Vatican should engage constructively with the SSPX to address their concerns and find a compromise that preserves Church unity. Escalating the dispute through excommunications is unlikely to resolve the underlying issues.