Listen to the article
Bukele Challenges Clinton on Salvadoran Prison Conditions Amid Deportation Controversy
El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele has offered a pointed response to former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton regarding allegations about conditions at the country’s maximum-security prison, which has become a focal point in ongoing immigration debates.
Clinton recently shared an 11-minute PBS Frontline documentary titled “Surviving CECOT” on social media platform X, writing: “Curious to learn more about CECOT? Hear Juan, Andry, and Wilmer share firsthand how the Trump administration branded them as gang members without evidence and deported them to the brutal El Salvadoran prison.”
The documentary features three Venezuelan men—Juan José Ramos Ramos, Andry Blanco Bonilla, and Wilmer Vega Sandia—who claim they were wrongfully identified as members of the notorious Tren de Aragua gang by U.S. authorities before being deported to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT).
Bukele’s response was both diplomatic and provocative. “We are willing to release our entire prison population (including all gang leaders and all those described as ‘political prisoners’) to any country willing to receive them,” he wrote. “The only condition is straightforward: it must be everyone.”
The Salvadoran president further suggested this would benefit journalists and non-governmental organizations by providing them with “thousands of former inmates available for interviews,” making it easier to find voices critical of his government. He added that if the testimonies in the documentary reflect systemic problems, “a much larger pool of sources should only reinforce the claim, and many governments should be eager to offer protection.”
Until such an arrangement materializes, Bukele affirmed that El Salvador would “continue prioritizing the human rights of the millions of Salvadorans who today live free from gang rule.”
CECOT has gained international attention for its strict conditions and has become central to immigration policies between the United States and El Salvador. The prison houses many of the country’s gang members and has recently begun receiving migrants deported from the U.S., particularly Venezuelan nationals deemed to be gang members whom Venezuela refuses to accept.
Bukele has strengthened his relationship with former President Donald Trump through this arrangement. The deportation program has sparked significant controversy, with human rights organizations raising concerns about due process and detention conditions.
The debate took a significant turn this week when a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to provide due process to a class of Venezuelan migrants deported to El Salvador in March. The judge gave the administration two weeks to detail its compliance plans, setting up what analysts describe as another high-stakes confrontation between the White House and federal courts.
The judge’s order comes amid increasing scrutiny of CECOT’s conditions and the process by which migrants are identified as gang members. Critics argue that some deportees are falsely labeled as gang affiliates without sufficient evidence or opportunity to challenge the designations.
El Salvador has undergone a dramatic transformation under Bukele’s leadership, with the president gaining popularity for his tough-on-crime approach that has significantly reduced gang violence in a country once considered among the world’s most dangerous. However, human rights organizations have questioned the methods used to achieve this security improvement.
This latest exchange between Bukele and Clinton highlights the complex intersection of immigration policy, international relations, and human rights concerns that continues to challenge policymakers in both countries.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


9 Comments
Bukele’s response seems intended to shift the narrative and put pressure on the U.S. It will be interesting to see if Clinton or others take him up on the offer to inspect the prison system. Transparency and accountability are important, regardless of the political posturing.
You raise a good point. Both sides appear to be positioning themselves, but the ultimate goal should be improving the lives of the incarcerated. I hope this exchange leads to meaningful reform, not just political theater.
This exchange highlights the complexities of the immigration and criminal justice systems. I hope both sides can move beyond the political posturing and work toward solutions that uphold human rights and dignity. Transparency and accountability will be crucial.
While I’m concerned about the allegations of mistreatment, Bukele’s invitation for inspection does seem to indicate a willingness to engage on the issue. Ultimately, the well-being of the incarcerated individuals should be the top concern for all involved.
Bukele’s offer is certainly attention-grabbing, but it remains to be seen whether it’s a genuine attempt at transparency or more political grandstanding. Addressing prison conditions should be the priority, not scoring rhetorical points.
Bukele’s response is certainly provocative, but it’s important to consider the full context. While prison conditions are concerning, the offer to open them up for inspection could be a genuine attempt at transparency. I’m curious to see how this plays out.
This is a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. I’m curious to learn more about the specific conditions and policies at the Salvadoran prison in question. Objective investigation and fact-finding will be key to understanding the full picture.
This is a complex geopolitical issue with valid concerns on both sides. It’s encouraging to see the leaders engage directly, even if their perspectives differ. I hope this dialogue leads to constructive solutions that address the well-being of all affected parties.
I agree, nuance and open communication are key here. While prison conditions are concerning, Bukele’s offer is thought-provoking and warrants further examination of the full context.