Listen to the article
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer faced mounting pressure Monday as the fallout from revelations about former UK ambassador Peter Mandelson’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein escalated into a serious crisis for his government, which took office just 19 months ago.
The prime minister’s authority within his Labour Party has been severely undermined by the scandal, despite Starmer himself having no personal connection to Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in 2019. The controversy centers on Starmer’s decision to appoint Mandelson as ambassador to Washington in 2024, despite Mandelson’s previous association with Epstein.
Several Labour parliamentarians have called for Starmer’s resignation, citing poor judgment in the appointment. The leader of Scottish Labour, Anas Sarwar, added his voice to these calls Monday, saying, “The distraction needs to end, and the leadership in Downing Street has to change.” Sarwar’s comments appear calculated to distance Scottish Labour from the increasingly unpopular prime minister ahead of Scottish parliamentary elections in May.
The crisis deepened over the weekend with the resignation of Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, who took responsibility for advising the prime minister on Mandelson’s appointment. McSweeney had been a key architect of Labour’s landslide electoral victory in July 2024 and one of Starmer’s closest advisers since 2020. The prime minister’s communications director has also stepped down.
Despite these high-profile departures, Downing Street issued a statement Monday affirming that Starmer has no intention of resigning: “He has a clear five-year mandate from the British people to deliver change, and that is what he will do.”
Senior Cabinet members rallied to support the embattled prime minister. Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy wrote on social media platform X: “We should let nothing distract us from our mission to change Britain and we support the Prime Minister in doing that.” Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper and Treasury chief Rachel Reeves also publicly backed Starmer.
The crisis erupted after Starmer dismissed Mandelson as ambassador in September when emails emerged showing that Mandelson had maintained a friendship with Epstein after the financier’s 2008 conviction for sex offenses involving a minor. Critics argue that Starmer should have vetted Mandelson more thoroughly before the appointment, given the 72-year-old politician’s history of controversies related to financial and ethical matters.
Further details about Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein came to light last week when U.S. authorities released a new tranche of Epstein-related documents, intensifying scrutiny of Starmer’s decision-making.
Starmer has apologized to Epstein’s victims and admitted to “having believed Mandelson’s lies.” He has promised to release documentation related to the appointment process, which the government claims will show that Mandelson misled officials about his connections to Epstein. However, the publication of these documents could take weeks due to national security reviews and potential conflicts with an ongoing police investigation.
Police are currently investigating Mandelson for possible misconduct in public office, following allegations he passed sensitive government information to Epstein approximately 15 years ago—an offense that carries a maximum life sentence. Mandelson has not been arrested or charged and faces no allegations of sexual misconduct.
Opposition Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch called Starmer’s position “untenable,” saying he “has made bad decision after bad decision.”
The Epstein scandal compounds existing challenges for Starmer’s government, which has struggled to deliver promised economic growth, repair public services damaged by years of austerity, or effectively address cost-of-living concerns. Recent opinion polls show Labour consistently trailing behind the hard-right Reform UK party.
Under Britain’s parliamentary system, prime ministers can be replaced without a general election. If Starmer resigns or faces a successful challenge, Labour would hold a leadership contest, with the winner becoming prime minister.
Some Labour politicians warn against a leadership change, recalling how the Conservatives cycled through three prime ministers between 2019 and 2024—including Liz Truss, whose tenure lasted just 49 days. Labour MP Clive Efford cautioned colleagues to “be careful what you wish for,” noting that frequent leadership changes “didn’t do [the Conservatives] any good.”
Starmer was scheduled to address Labour lawmakers behind closed doors Monday evening in an attempt to rebuild his damaged authority and prevent his premiership from becoming one of the shortest in modern British history.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
This scandal is a significant setback for Starmer and his Labour Party. Their credibility is on the line, and they must respond in a way that demonstrates their commitment to ethical governance and transparency.
Well said. The public deserves answers, and Starmer needs to take bold action to regain their trust. Sweeping this under the rug is simply not an option.
The Mandelson-Epstein connection is deeply troubling and raises serious questions about the government’s vetting processes. Starmer must act quickly to investigate the matter and hold those responsible accountable.
This scandal is a major test for Starmer’s leadership. His handling of the Mandelson appointment and the fallout will be closely watched by the public and his own party. Transparency and accountability will be key.
Agreed. Starmer needs to take strong, decisive action to address this crisis head-on and regain the trust of the British people. Sweeping it under the rug is not an option.
Fascinating developments in UK politics. The Mandelson-Epstein affair seems to be a major headache for PM Starmer, even though he was not personally involved. The public deserves full transparency on this matter.
I agree, the government needs to address this scandal head-on and restore public trust. Appointing Mandelson as ambassador despite his Epstein ties appears to be a serious lapse in judgment.
The Mandelson-Epstein revelations are a major political crisis for Starmer and his government. Their handling of this situation will be closely watched and could have far-reaching consequences.
This situation highlights the importance of vetting high-level government appointments thoroughly. Ties to convicted sex offenders like Epstein are extremely concerning and should disqualify candidates from sensitive roles.
Absolutely. The public expects the highest standards of integrity from their leaders. Starmer will need to act decisively to regain credibility on this issue.
While the details are still emerging, it seems the Mandelson-Epstein connection poses serious reputational risks for the government. Starmer will need to navigate this crisis carefully to avoid further political damage.