Listen to the article
Belgium at Crossroads Over Frozen Russian Assets as EU Pushes Ukraine Aid Package
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen are engaged in intensive diplomatic efforts with Belgium’s government over the fate of approximately €197 billion ($224 billion) in frozen Russian assets currently held in the Brussels-based financial institution Euroclear.
The European Commission is proposing to seize these assets and redirect them to Ukraine as part of a larger €165 billion ($190 billion) financial package designed to sustain Ukraine’s government operations and war effort. This proposal comes at a critical juncture, as Ukraine is projected to exhaust its current funding by April.
Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever has expressed significant hesitation, concerned that seizing Russia’s assets could be interpreted as an act of war and potentially trigger retaliation against Belgium. These concerns were amplified when Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia’s Security Council, issued a direct threat on social media, suggesting that if the EU “steals” frozen Russian assets, Russia might view it as “casus belli with all the relevant implications for Brussels & Co.”
“Belgium’s particular situation regarding the use of the frozen Russian assets is undeniable and must be addressed in such a way that all European states bear the same risk,” von der Leyen stated after meeting with Merz and De Wever. The diplomatic discussions have intensified as the December 18 EU leaders’ summit approaches, when a final decision on the Ukraine support package must be made.
Chancellor Merz acknowledged Belgium’s concerns as legitimate, posting on social media: “What we decide now will determine Europe’s future: Belgium’s particular vulnerability in the issue of utilizing the frozen Russian assets is indisputable and must be addressed in such a way that all European states bear the same risk.”
Robert Kremzner, an associate analyst with the New Lines Institute specializing in Russian gray zone warfare, explained that Russia has multiple options to target Belgium without resorting to conventional warfare. “Russia has been very active in using something called gray zone warfare, which sees Russia undertaking hostile actions against other nations that are below the threshold of war, and thus not that easy to respond to,” Kremzner told Fox News Digital. These tactics could include information warfare, cyberattacks, election interference, GPS spoofing, sabotage of undersea cables, arson attacks, or even assassinations.
The Belgian government and Euroclear are seeking financial guarantees from other EU member states before committing to the plan. De Wever specifically fears that Belgium might ultimately bear sole responsibility for repaying the seized assets if a future sanctions deal with Russia becomes part of any peace settlement with Ukraine.
While the European Commission claims it has implemented safeguards to protect member states and financial institutions from Russian retaliation, Belgium’s continued resistance has raised the possibility that von der Leyen might invoke the EU’s Article 122 emergency powers. This would allow the Commission to proceed with the proposal on a majority-rule basis, potentially circumventing Belgium’s objections.
The standoff highlights the complex geopolitical and financial calculations facing EU leaders as they attempt to maintain support for Ukraine while managing the risks of escalation with Russia. With Ukraine’s financial situation becoming increasingly precarious, the pressure on Belgium to find a compromise solution is mounting as the December deadline approaches.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
It’s understandable that Belgium is wary of antagonizing Russia, given their geographic proximity and economic ties. But the EU needs a united front to effectively aid Ukraine. I hope they can find a way to contribute that manages the geopolitical risks.
Seizing Russian assets is a controversial move, but could be an important way to fund Ukraine’s defense and recovery. Belgium is in a difficult position, trying to balance their own interests with the broader EU priorities. This will require nuanced diplomacy on all sides.
You’re right, this is a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. Belgium has to weigh the potential backlash from Russia against the need to support Ukraine. Not an easy decision.
This highlights the difficult tradeoffs countries face in supporting Ukraine. Belgium doesn’t want to invite Russian retaliation, but the EU can’t afford to let individual members obstruct crucial aid. It will require careful diplomacy to reach a consensus.
Agreed. Belgium’s concerns are valid, but the broader EU interests may need to take priority here. A coordinated, unified response is important, even if it means some members have to make difficult concessions.
The threat of Kremlin retaliation is understandably worrying for Belgium. They have to balance their own national security with the need to support Ukraine. This is a complex geopolitical challenge that requires nuance and compromise from all sides.
This is a tricky situation for Belgium. On one hand, they want to support Ukraine and the broader EU effort. But they’re understandably wary of provoking direct retaliation from Russia, which could have devastating consequences. It’s a delicate balance they’ll have to navigate carefully.
I can understand Belgium’s hesitation. They don’t want to risk their own security and stability by antagonizing Russia. But the EU needs a coordinated approach to providing aid to Ukraine.