Listen to the article
Public Condemns Social Media’s Handling of UK Unrest Misinformation
Social media platforms have faced widespread criticism after misinformation falsely claiming the Southport murderer was a Muslim immigrant spread rapidly across networks, contributing to nationwide disorder. A new YouGov survey reveals that two-thirds of Britons (66%) believe social media companies should be held responsible for posts inciting criminal behavior during the recent unrest.
The survey highlights a significant public consensus that tech platforms failed in their responsibility to curb dangerous content. A striking 71% of respondents said social media companies did a poor job handling misinformation during the unrest, with 46% characterizing their performance as “very bad.” Only 9% believed the platforms managed the situation well.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has emphasized that social media companies need to take responsibility for amplifying misinformation and encouraging violence. Several individuals have already been arrested for content posted online related to the disturbances, many of which were organized through social media channels.
The public’s judgment appears clear—only one in five Britons (20%) believe social media companies should not be held responsible for user-generated content. However, significant demographic differences emerged in the survey. Reform UK voters showed the greatest leniency toward platforms, with 41% saying companies shouldn’t bear responsibility for user posts, compared to just 11-15% among Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat supporters.
A notable age divide also appeared, with 33% of 18-24-year-olds saying firms should not be accountable for user content, versus only 12% of respondents over 65.
The survey reveals widespread support for stronger regulation of social media companies. Seven in ten Britons (70%) believe these firms are not regulated strongly enough, with 39% stating there is “much too little” oversight. Only 14% think current regulation levels are appropriate, while 7% believe companies face excessive restrictions.
While social media platforms have taken varying measures to counter harmful content during the unrest, public perception indicates these efforts fell significantly short of expectations. Reform UK voters again stood apart, with 56% criticizing platform performance—still a majority, but notably lower than other voting blocs. Almost a quarter of Reform supporters (23%) thought platforms handled the situation well.
Traditional media has not escaped scrutiny either. Though 86% of Britons felt social media bore significant responsibility for the recent unrest, 69% also attributed blame to news media. However, public opinion on regulation differs markedly between digital and traditional media. While 46% believe print media requires stronger regulation, 34% consider current levels appropriate. Similarly, 42% support tighter broadcast media regulation, but nearly as many (39%) think existing controls are sufficient.
Reform UK voters consistently demonstrated distinct views across all media types, being twice as likely to believe social media firms are either appropriately regulated (26%) or too restricted (17%). However, these perspectives align with their general attitudes toward media regulation rather than representing a specific stance on social platforms.
As the aftermath of the unrest continues to unfold, these findings suggest a significant public appetite for greater accountability from tech platforms during periods of social tension, with particular concern about their role in spreading misinformation and potentially fueling disorder.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
It’s concerning to see how social media was exploited to amplify misinformation and incite unrest. The public’s call for greater accountability from tech companies is understandable and justified. Meaningful reform is urgently needed.
This is a concerning development. Social media companies must be held accountable for enabling the spread of harmful misinformation that incites violence and unrest. They have a responsibility to moderate their platforms more effectively.
I agree. Platforms need to do a much better job at proactively identifying and removing content that could lead to real-world consequences.
The public is right to demand more from social media companies. These platforms have become vectors for the rapid dissemination of false and inflammatory content. Stronger regulation and enforcement is clearly needed.
Absolutely. Social media’s role in exacerbating societal tensions and undermining public trust is deeply troubling. Urgent action is required.
This is a troubling development that highlights the urgent need for stronger oversight and accountability measures for social media companies. Their platforms have become vectors for the rapid spread of harmful misinformation with real-world consequences.
The survey findings underscore the public’s growing frustration with social media companies’ failure to address the serious harms caused by unchecked misinformation on their platforms. Meaningful reform and accountability measures are long overdue.
I share your sentiment. Social media’s role in fueling societal divisions and unrest must be urgently addressed through robust regulation and enforcement.
This is a complex issue, but the public’s call for greater accountability from social media companies is understandable. Their platforms have become breeding grounds for dangerous misinformation that has real-world consequences. Reforms are clearly needed.
The survey results highlight the public’s growing skepticism towards social media companies’ ability to self-regulate and contain the spread of harmful content. Stronger oversight and enforcement mechanisms are clearly needed to address this pressing issue.
I agree. Social media platforms have demonstrated an inability to effectively moderate content and mitigate the risks they pose to public safety and social cohesion.
The survey findings underscore the public’s diminishing trust in social media companies’ capacity to address the serious harms caused by unchecked misinformation on their platforms. Tougher regulation and enforcement measures are clearly required.
I share your view. Social media’s role in fueling societal divisions and unrest must be urgently addressed through robust policy interventions and stronger accountability mechanisms.
The public’s demand for social media companies to be held responsible for content that incites criminal behavior is a justified response to the platforms’ failure to effectively moderate and contain the spread of dangerous misinformation. Meaningful reform is clearly required.
I agree wholeheartedly. Social media’s role in exacerbating societal tensions and undermining public trust must be urgently addressed through robust regulatory and enforcement measures.
It’s disheartening to see how social media was exploited to spread misinformation and incite violence during the recent unrest. Clearly, the public has lost faith in these companies’ ability to self-regulate. Tougher oversight is clearly warranted.