Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Poland’s Comprehensive Plan to Combat Disinformation Unveiled by Foreign Affairs Council

A council established by Poland’s Minister of Foreign Affairs has released an extensive set of recommendations aimed at combating the growing threat of disinformation in the country’s information environment. The proposals, which represent a collaborative effort between social groups, academic institutions, industry representatives, and public administration officials, outline a multi-faceted approach to addressing what officials describe as an urgent national security concern.

The recommendations emphasize swift implementation of key European Union regulations, particularly the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Artificial Intelligence Act, into Polish law. These frameworks are seen as essential tools that would provide both government authorities and civil society with more effective mechanisms to counter manipulation in the digital sphere.

Notably, the council calls for strengthening criminal law provisions regarding entities engaged in disinformation activities. The group acknowledges that most disinformation content currently remains legal under Polish law despite causing “real and long-term social damage.” Any legislative changes, the council stresses, must be crafted with full respect for freedom of speech to avoid reinforcing narratives about alleged censorship.

Central to the proposal is the development of a comprehensive national strategy to counter international disinformation. The council recommends that the Interministerial Group for Counteracting Foreign Information Interference and Manipulation take urgent action to adopt such a strategy, which would identify primary sources and techniques of foreign disinformation, catalog necessary countermeasures, and potentially establish an independent unit within the Prime Minister’s Chancellery to coordinate these efforts.

Media support features prominently in the recommendations, with the council advocating for increased financial backing for independent and pluralist media outlets through funds and grants. This approach, which mirrors solutions adopted in countries like Estonia and France, aims to promote reliable information and enhance public debate transparency.

The council also emphasizes the critical role of very large online platforms (VLOPs) in fighting disinformation. Beyond legal enforcement through the DSA, the recommendations call for ensuring these platforms fulfill their commitments under the EU Code of Conduct on Disinformation, including eliminating revenue from advertisements on misleading accounts and websites.

Recognizing the valuable contributions of non-governmental organizations in countering disinformation, the council recommends increased government support for civil society initiatives focused on prebunking, fact-checking, and monitoring disinformation. This includes developing a comprehensive report on the needs of these organizations regarding expert networks, technical infrastructure, and know-how.

Educational initiatives feature prominently in the recommendations, with proposals to incorporate critical thinking skills and media literacy education into school curricula from preschool through secondary education. Teacher training programs would also include components on countering disinformation, with adequate funding allocated for these purposes.

The council places significant emphasis on international cooperation, particularly with NATO and the EU, while remaining open to collaboration with other partners. This reflects the cross-border nature of disinformation threats and the need for coordinated responses.

Tomasz Chłoń, from Poland’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, chairs the Council for Resilience, which includes representatives from various universities, foundations, research institutions, and business associations.

The comprehensive approach outlined in these recommendations reflects growing concern across Europe about the impact of coordinated disinformation campaigns on democratic processes, national security, and social cohesion. As Poland moves forward with implementing these proposals, the effectiveness of this multi-stakeholder approach will likely be closely watched by other nations facing similar challenges.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

9 Comments

  1. Mary H. Martinez on

    The emphasis on swift implementation is encouraging. Disinformation moves quickly, so having an agile response framework in place is important. Monitoring the real-world impact of these policies will be key.

    • Oliver Lopez on

      Absolutely. Nimble and proactive measures are needed to stay ahead of evolving disinformation tactics. Careful analysis of outcomes will be crucial to refining the approach over time.

  2. Jennifer Moore on

    Curious to see how these recommendations address the role of social media platforms in combating disinformation. Platform accountability and transparency will be essential to any comprehensive strategy.

  3. The long-term, systemic nature of the disinformation challenge requires a multi-faceted response. These proposals seem to recognize that and aim for a comprehensive approach. Effectiveness will depend on consistent, sustained effort.

  4. Isabella A. Smith on

    Aligning Polish law with EU regulations like the DSA and AI Act could provide useful tools, but enforcement will be critical. Disinformation is a global challenge that requires coordinated efforts across borders.

  5. Noah H. Johnson on

    Interesting that the recommendations call for both government and civil society involvement. Engaging a broad range of stakeholders could enhance the effectiveness of the overall strategy.

  6. Interesting recommendations from Poland’s Foreign Ministry to combat disinformation. Stronger legal frameworks and enforcement do seem necessary to address this complex issue, which has security implications. I’m curious to see how these proposals will be implemented in practice.

  7. Liam H. Thomas on

    The call to strengthen criminal laws targeting disinformation actors is bold. While free speech is important, malicious campaigns can cause real harm. Curious to see how they balance those priorities. Effective implementation will be key.

    • Lucas I. Brown on

      Agreed, it’s a delicate balance between protecting free expression and curbing intentional misinformation campaigns. Interested to see the details on how they plan to do that.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.