Listen to the article
Ireland’s Disinformation Strategy Criticized for Overlooking Social Media Algorithms
Ireland’s newly published national strategy to combat disinformation has drawn criticism from the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL), which claims the plan fails to address what it considers a critical component: the regulation of social media algorithms.
The national counter disinformation strategy, released last week after two years of development by a government working group, aims to provide a comprehensive approach to tackling false information. However, the ICCL withdrew from the working group in August 2024, citing the government’s unwillingness to include measures targeting social media algorithms.
According to the ICCL, the “recommender” algorithms employed by platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram require stricter regulation. These algorithms determine what content users see in their feeds and have significant influence on public discourse. EU research indicates that algorithm-curated social media feeds have become the primary source of political information for Europeans under 30.
Dr. Johnny Ryan of ICCL expressed serious concerns about this omission, stating: “Foreign powers control the hidden levers of our public debate. US and Chinese social media algorithms suppress trustworthy journalism, amplify some voices and censor others.”
Ryan further warned that these algorithms have inadvertently promoted extremist content for over a decade and have pushed harmful content, including material related to self-harm and suicide, to younger users. He emphasized the urgency of addressing this issue, particularly in light of potential political interference: “Now, with Trump in charge, Europe faces a new intentional algorithmic assault to boost authoritarians into power across the continent.”
Despite these criticisms, the government has defended its strategy as an important first step. Patrick O’Donovan, Minister for Arts, Media, Communications, Culture and Sport, described disinformation as “a serious challenge which can only be met with a whole-of-society response.”
O’Donovan outlined key elements of the strategy, including the promotion of media pluralism and freedom, support for media literacy throughout communities, effective implementation of platform regulations, and coordination with stakeholders. He emphasized that these measures would “not only counter disinformation but protect freedom of expression while supporting information integrity.”
The government plans to establish an oversight group to monitor implementation of the strategy, with a focus on developing a comprehensive implementation plan. This signals a continued commitment to evolving the approach as needed.
Martina Chapman, who served as the independent chair of the working group, described the strategy as “the foundation for a long-term, collaborative plan for countering disinformation,” emphasizing that a “coordinated approach, grounded in cooperation and respect for freedom of expression is essential.”
The disagreement highlights the complex challenge of regulating digital platforms while balancing freedom of expression with protection against harmful content. As social media platforms continue to exert growing influence on public discourse and opinion formation, the debate over how to effectively regulate algorithms without imposing undue restrictions on speech remains contentious.
This development comes amid broader European efforts to address disinformation, with the EU implementing various regulatory frameworks including the Digital Services Act, which aims to increase platform accountability. How Ireland’s strategy will align with these wider European initiatives, particularly regarding algorithmic regulation, remains to be seen.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
This news highlights an important blind spot in the EU’s disinformation strategy. Social media algorithms are a key driver of the spread of false information, so failing to address them seems like a major weakness in the plan. Regulating these systems should be a top priority if the goal is to truly tackle the problem effectively.
You make a fair point. The ICCL’s criticism of the EU’s strategy for not addressing social media algorithms is valid. These systems have a significant influence on the information people consume, so they need to be a central part of any disinformation-fighting efforts.
Interesting perspective on the EU’s disinformation strategy. I agree that social media algorithms should be a key focus, as they can significantly influence what information people see and engage with. Regulating these systems is crucial to combating the spread of misinformation.
You raise a good point. The algorithms powering social media feeds play a major role in shaping public discourse and access to information. Addressing this blind spot in the strategy seems like a missed opportunity to tackle disinformation more effectively.
The ICCL’s concerns about the EU’s disinformation strategy are understandable. Social media algorithms play a pivotal role in determining the information people see and engage with, which can significantly impact public discourse. Overlooking this factor seems like a significant oversight in the plan.
I agree. Addressing the influence of social media algorithms should be a central focus of any comprehensive strategy to combat the spread of disinformation. This seems like a crucial element that the EU’s approach is currently lacking.
This news highlights an important gap in the EU’s approach to tackling disinformation. Focusing on social media algorithms and their role in amplifying misinformation seems like a necessary step to make the strategy more effective. I’m curious to see if this criticism leads to any changes in the plan.
You make a good point. The EU’s strategy seems to be missing a critical component by not addressing the influence of social media algorithms. Regulating these systems should be a key priority if the goal is to truly curb the spread of false information online.
The ICCL’s criticism of the EU’s strategy seems valid. Overlooking the impact of social media algorithms is a significant oversight, given their influence on the information people consume. Effective regulation of these systems should be a priority in combating disinformation.
I agree. Social media algorithms are a crucial piece of the puzzle when it comes to addressing the spread of false information online. Ignoring this factor in the strategy leaves a major vulnerability that should be addressed.