Listen to the article
In a troubling development ahead of Nepal’s March 5 House of Representatives elections, disinformation campaigns have emerged as a serious threat to electoral integrity. Social media platforms have become battlegrounds where artificially manipulated content aims to distort reality and sway voter opinions.
Authorities have observed an alarming rise in AI-generated content designed to manipulate public perception. One widely circulated fabricated image depicts a prominent candidate being driven away by crowds, while another fake video shows a candidate facing violent threats during campaign activities. These manipulated media have spread rapidly across social platforms, triggering public outrage and raising concerns about election security.
The Nepal Police Cyber Bureau has launched efforts to identify and prosecute those responsible for creating and sharing such deceptive content. Law enforcement officials have issued stern warnings to the public about the legal consequences of sharing violent threats or fabricated material online.
By Sunday, the Election Commission (EC) had identified 302 pieces of harmful content requiring intervention. These items have been forwarded to relevant authorities, including the Cyber Bureau, the Press Council, and the EC’s Central Code of Conduct Monitoring Committee for appropriate action. Investigators have determined that political parties, their leadership, and their supporters are the primary sources of misleading information.
“This content is strategically crafted to shape political narratives and construct false realities that mislead voters,” explained a cybersecurity expert familiar with the situation. “The monetization model of social media platforms creates perverse incentives, where sensational and inflammatory content—regardless of accuracy—generates more views and therefore more revenue for content creators.”
Authorities face significant challenges in addressing the disinformation surge. Legal frameworks have not kept pace with the rapid evolution of digital communication technologies. The Nepal Police acknowledge that existing laws are inadequate to address the scale and sophistication of current disinformation tactics.
Nepal’s limited digital governance infrastructure presents another obstacle. Unlike many countries that establish pre-election coordination mechanisms with major social media platforms, Nepal is only beginning to develop such relationships. There is some progress on this front, however, with the EC reportedly negotiating memoranda of understanding with Meta and having recently signed an agreement with TikTok on February 5 to combat election-related misinformation.
The electoral code of conduct provides for fines of up to Rs. 100,000 for spreading false information on social media. Additionally, existing laws allow for fines of up to Rs. 200,000, imprisonment for up to three years, or both, for disseminating content deemed harmful to Nepal’s independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity, or national unity.
Political analysts warn that the spread of disinformation strikes at the heart of democratic processes. Elections fundamentally rely on voter trust, informed decision-making, and the peaceful acceptance of results to facilitate orderly transitions of power. When voters make choices based on manipulated information, election outcomes may not accurately reflect the will of the people.
“Disinformation is particularly dangerous because it’s designed to trigger strong emotional responses—anger, fear, hatred,” noted a political science professor at Tribhuvan University. “These emotions deepen political polarization and transform what should be a democratic exercise into something resembling a battlefield.”
As the March 5 election approaches, election officials, law enforcement, and civic organizations are racing to develop more effective countermeasures against the tide of disinformation. The outcome of these efforts could have significant implications for the health of Nepal’s democracy and the legitimacy of its electoral process.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
Disinformation campaigns are a serious threat to the integrity of elections. I hope the authorities in Nepal can effectively combat this issue and ensure a fair and democratic process.
Educating the public on media literacy and encouraging critical thinking is also important in the fight against disinformation. We all have a role to play in maintaining the health of our democratic institutions.
It’s alarming to see the rise of AI-generated disinformation designed to sway voter opinions. Robust election security measures and public education are essential to preserve the integrity of the democratic process.
Agreed. Strict enforcement of laws against sharing manipulated media is crucial. Social platforms also need to improve their content moderation capabilities to detect and remove such content.
The use of AI-generated content to manipulate public perception is a worrying trend. I hope the authorities in Nepal can effectively counter these efforts and ensure a fair and transparent electoral process.
Disinformation campaigns that target elections undermine the foundations of democracy. I’m glad to see the authorities in Nepal taking decisive action to address this issue.
The public also has a responsibility to be discerning and to verify information before sharing it on social media. Fact-checking is crucial in the fight against disinformation.
The rise of AI-generated disinformation is a worrying development. I’m glad to see the Nepal authorities taking action to identify and prosecute those responsible for creating and spreading this content.
Disinformation campaigns that target elections are a threat to democracy. I hope the authorities in Nepal can effectively identify and hold accountable those responsible for creating and spreading this manipulated content.
It’s concerning to see the proliferation of fabricated media designed to sway voter opinions. Kudos to the Nepal authorities for their efforts to identify and remove such content.
Fabricated images and videos can have a significant impact on public perception, especially in the context of elections. I’m glad to see the authorities taking steps to identify and prosecute those responsible.
This is a complex issue with no easy solutions. Balancing free speech and combating disinformation requires a multi-faceted approach involving government, social media companies, and the public.
Combating the spread of disinformation is a critical challenge, especially in the digital age. I commend the efforts of the Nepal Police Cyber Bureau and the Election Commission to address this issue.
Educating the public on how to spot and verify information online is also crucial. We all have a role to play in maintaining the integrity of our democratic processes.
Disinformation campaigns targeting elections are a serious threat to democracy. Authorities must take strong action to identify and prosecute those responsible for creating and spreading manipulated content online.
I agree, the public needs to be vigilant about verifying information from social media before sharing. Fact-checking is crucial to combat the spread of false narratives.