Listen to the article
The Trump administration is facing growing criticism for its continued unauthorized use of copyrighted content in military propaganda videos, with Japanese gaming giant Nintendo becoming the latest target in a string of intellectual property appropriations.
A controversial propaganda video shared on social media Thursday has drawn widespread condemnation for repurposing elements from Nintendo’s popular Wii Sports game. The video, which garnered 11.7 million views on X (formerly Twitter) by midday, juxtaposes lighthearted footage of Wii characters hitting balls with graphic imagery of U.S. military strikes, all accompanied by Nintendo’s recognizable gaming music.
The social media response has been overwhelmingly negative, with more than 8,000 comments predominantly criticizing the administration’s decision to appropriate the family-friendly gaming content for military propaganda purposes.
This incident represents just the latest in a pattern of unauthorized content usage by the administration. Earlier this week, Steve Downes, the voice actor behind Halo’s Master Chief character, publicly objected to the use of his likeness without permission. The administration has similarly borrowed intellectual property from major entertainment franchises including “Transformers,” “Star Wars,” “Breaking Bad,” and “Tropic Thunder,” as well as content from major sports leagues like the NFL and MLB.
The gaming industry has been particularly targeted, with content from Pokémon, Call of Duty, and Grand Theft Auto all appearing in administration propaganda materials without apparent authorization from publishers or developers.
Nintendo, which has not yet commented on this specific incident, has a well-established reputation for aggressively protecting its intellectual property rights. The company’s silence should not be interpreted as acceptance, as industry observers note that Nintendo typically pursues legal remedies rather than engaging in public disputes.
The timing is particularly notable as Nintendo is currently involved in separate legal action against the Trump administration over tariff policies. The Japanese gaming giant has filed a lawsuit seeking refunds with interest for duties paid under what it characterizes as unlawful tariff impositions. These trade policies have already impacted Nintendo’s business operations, forcing the company to delay pre-orders for its highly anticipated Switch 2 console while it reconsiders pricing strategies for the U.S. market.
The tariff dispute highlights the complex relationship between the administration and foreign technology companies. Nintendo, as one of Japan’s most recognized global brands, finds itself navigating both intellectual property concerns and broader trade tensions simultaneously.
Media and intellectual property experts suggest these repeated unauthorized uses of copyrighted material raise significant legal questions. While parody and fair use provisions exist in U.S. copyright law, the systematic appropriation of recognizable entertainment properties for political messaging tests the boundaries of these protections.
The controversy also underscores the increasingly blurred lines between entertainment, politics, and military propaganda in the digital age. As social media platforms facilitate the rapid spread of such content, rights holders face growing challenges in monitoring and responding to unauthorized uses of their intellectual property.
For the administration, the strategy appears designed to capitalize on popular culture’s reach and resonance, particularly with younger demographics. However, the backlash suggests this approach may be alienating the very audiences it aims to influence.
As this pattern continues, legal experts anticipate potential copyright infringement claims from multiple entertainment companies seeking to protect their brands from political appropriation that could damage their carefully cultivated public images and commercial interests.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


8 Comments
While I understand the desire to create eye-catching propaganda, this video’s use of Wii Sports content feels like a cheap gimmick. It’s disappointing to see the administration disregard intellectual property laws and the serious nature of military action.
I agree, this video is a poor attempt to capitalize on a popular gaming franchise. It comes across as tone-deaf and disrespectful.
The administration’s continued unauthorized use of copyrighted content is concerning. This video game-style propaganda trivializes the gravity of military strikes and undermines public trust. They should focus on transparent, ethical communication instead of gimmicks.
This video game-style propaganda is in extremely poor taste. Using copyrighted content without permission is unethical and disrespectful. The administration should focus on diplomacy rather than glorifying military strikes.
Repurposing Wii Sports footage for military propaganda is an unfortunate and distasteful choice. The administration should be more mindful of intellectual property rights and the impact of their messaging, especially when it comes to portraying armed conflict.
Agreed, this is a poor decision that reflects poorly on the administration. They should reconsider their approach to military communications.
This video game-style propaganda is a concerning development. While eye-catching, the use of copyrighted Wii Sports content without permission is disrespectful and undermines the gravity of the subject matter. The administration should focus on more responsible, transparent communication.
Appropriating popular gaming content for military propaganda is a concerning trend. It trivializes violence and blurs the line between entertainment and real-world conflict. The administration should be more mindful of intellectual property rights and the impact of their messaging.