Listen to the article
Anti-Zionist Groups in US Serving as “Digital Couriers” for Terrorist Content, ADL Report Finds
Anti-Zionist organizations operating across the United States are actively disseminating propaganda created by foreign terrorist groups through social media channels, according to a comprehensive new report released by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
The report, titled “Digital Couriers,” details how these American-based groups function as conduits for content originating from Hamas, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), and other designated terrorist organizations in Gaza and throughout the Middle East.
“Protesters and activists are not merely praising the activity of terror groups; they are actively sharing their official propaganda, disseminating communiqués, videos, and other materials directly into mainstream platforms,” the ADL report states. This activity, researchers warn, “normalizes the eliminationist goals and terrorist tactics” within certain activist communities in America, effectively blurring distinctions between legitimate political protest and explicit support for terrorism.
The investigation identifies several key platforms utilized in this propaganda pipeline. Telegram hosts the “Resistance News Network” (RNN), which the ADL characterizes as a “radical, antisemitic, anti-Zionist” channel. RNN reportedly plays a pivotal role in translating terrorist content for American consumption while creating additional materials that glorify violence and terrorist attacks.
Instagram has emerged as another significant conduit, particularly favored by Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), an organization that has been at the center of campus controversies nationwide. According to the report, SJP chapters have shared messages from Hamas spokespeople and commemorated the October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel as a day of celebration. In some instances, SJP accounts reportedly shared footage of Hamas fighters inside Israeli family homes during the attacks.
The ADL’s findings align with previous intelligence assessments regarding foreign influence in campus activism. In July 2024, then-National Intelligence Director Avril Haines confirmed that U.S. intelligence agencies had observed “actors tied to Iran’s government posing as activists online, seeking to encourage protests, and even providing financial support to protesters.” Haines described these activities as part of a broader strategy to “undermine confidence in our democratic institutions.”
Further evidence of concerning rhetoric has emerged from SJP’s national leadership. In October, the organization appeared to call for violence against Muslim “collaborators” working with Israel, stating “Death to the occupation. Death to Zionism. Death to all collaborators” in a social media post. In a separate statement from 2024, the group described their strategy of using campus activism as a means toward “the total collapse of the university structure and American empire itself.”
At Columbia University, where anti-Israel demonstrations garnered national attention, an SJP affiliate reportedly distributed literature to incoming freshmen that explicitly supported “armed struggle” and aimed to “build popular support for the Palestinian war of national liberation.” The materials invoked religious language and referred to Hamas by its full name, the “Islamic Resistance Movement.”
The ADL report concludes with recommendations for disrupting this pipeline of terrorist content. It urges social media platforms to enforce their existing policies prohibiting the sharing of materials from designated terrorist organizations. Additionally, it calls on colleges and universities to ensure students do not violate federal laws by distributing such content.
The findings come amid growing concerns about antisemitism on American campuses, where Jewish students have reported harassment, exclusion, and physical assaults at numerous institutions since October 2023. The report suggests that the normalization of terrorist rhetoric through these digital channels may be contributing to the increasingly hostile environment faced by Jewish students across the country.
As social media continues to serve as a primary information source for young Americans, the report highlights the critical need for greater awareness regarding the origins of political content and the potential legal implications of distributing materials from designated terrorist organizations.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
This is a very serious allegation. If true, it’s deeply troubling that American groups would be used as conduits for terrorist content. But the specifics of the groups and activities identified need to be scrutinized carefully to avoid unfairly smearing all anti-Zionist activism.
Disseminating terrorist propaganda, even inadvertently, is extremely dangerous and must be condemned. However, we should be cautious about how this issue is framed to avoid unfairly targeting legitimate anti-occupation activism or criticism of Israeli government policies.
I share your concerns. Distinguishing between legitimate protest and support for terrorism is crucial. Any report on this topic needs to be thoroughly researched and presented objectively.
The findings in this report are deeply concerning, if true. Allowing terrorist propaganda to be amplified, even inadvertently, is extremely dangerous. However, the definitions and criteria used need to be scrutinized to ensure valid criticism of Israeli policies is not being conflated with extremism.
Agreed. Any efforts to combat the spread of terrorist content online must be balanced against protecting free speech and avoiding the suppression of legitimate political dissent.
This report raises serious concerns about how anti-Zionist groups in the US may be enabling the spread of terrorist propaganda online. It’s crucial that we maintain clear boundaries between legitimate political discourse and support for extremism or violence.
I agree, the blurring of these lines is very troubling. Platforms need to be vigilant in detecting and removing any content that directly promotes terrorist activities or goals.
Allowing terrorist propaganda to spread, even indirectly, is completely unacceptable. But the ADL report should provide more context and nuance around how these determinations were made. Overzealous labeling of dissent as ‘terrorist’ is a concerning trend we must watch out for.
I agree, the details and methodology behind this report need to be transparent. We can’t let valid criticisms of Israeli policies get conflated with outright support for terrorism.
This is a troubling allegation that requires very careful examination. While the spread of terrorist propaganda is always unacceptable, we must ensure that legitimate anti-occupation activism and political dissent are not unfairly targeted or silenced under the guise of ‘anti-Zionism’.
While I’m concerned by the findings, I wonder how the report defines ‘anti-Zionist’ and if there’s nuance being overlooked in terms of criticism of Israeli policies versus outright support for terrorism. The line between protest and propaganda can be murky.
That’s a fair point. The report should provide more clarity on the specific criteria used to identify these ‘anti-Zionist’ groups and their activities. Avoiding overgeneralization is important.
This is a complex and sensitive issue that requires nuanced analysis. While the spread of terrorist propaganda is never acceptable, we must be vigilant to ensure that valid criticism of Israeli government policies is not unfairly labeled as ‘anti-Zionist’ or ‘terrorist’ in nature.