Listen to the article
Treasury Department to Air Super Bowl Ad Promoting Controversial “Trump Accounts”
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed Wednesday that the government has purchased premium advertising space during the upcoming Super Bowl to promote the newly established “Trump Accounts,” a national investment program for American newborns. The high-profile commercial will air immediately following Charlie Puth’s rendition of the National Anthem this Sunday.
“I would tell everyone to look for the commercial right after the national anthem at the Super Bowl this weekend,” Bessent testified to the House Financial Services Committee. “I think we are prepared for a flood of sign-ups, and then they will go live on July 5.”
The advertising spot represents a significant expenditure of government resources, as NBC has disclosed that 30-second advertisements in prime positions during this year’s Super Bowl in Santa Clara, California, cost approximately $10 million. Even standard advertisement slots are commanding $8 million, while pre-game broadcast spots run about $7 million, according to Sports Business Journal.
Semafor reported in January that a pro-Trump group would be financing the advertisement. Billionaire Michael Dell, who contributed $6.25 billion to the initiative, shared a preview of the commercial on social media platform X. The teaser depicts children playing against various American landscapes as a narrator states that the “children of our nation will have a voice,” concluding with a young girl saying, “Dear America.”
The Treasury Department’s commercial aims to raise awareness about the “Trump Accounts” program, which promises to provide $1,000 in government funding for investment accounts for each American newborn. Parents will be able to supplement these accounts with up to $5,000 annually as additional investments.
The program launched officially on January 28 with a summit featuring notable attendees including rapper Nicki Minaj. However, the administration faced immediate criticism regarding inconsistencies in the financial mathematics underpinning the accounts.
While the concept of government-sponsored investment accounts for children has garnered bipartisan support, the decision to brand them as “Trump Accounts” instead of the originally proposed “Invest America accounts” has sparked significant controversy. Democrats have been particularly vocal in their criticism, noting that the concept did not originate with the president.
The accounts were officially established as part of what the administration called the “Big Beautiful Bill” passed this summer. Republican lawmakers reportedly renamed the accounts in the final version of the legislation to highlight the president’s connection to the program during a period when his approval ratings were considerably higher.
The business community has expressed reservations about the political nature of the naming, with many industry leaders advocating for a return to the politically neutral designation “530A accounts” instead.
Despite the controversy surrounding the branding, President Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for the initiative. Critics, primarily from Democratic ranks, have characterized the accounts as a veiled attempt to privatize Social Security. The White House has defended the naming decision by asserting that the accounts would not have been approved without Trump’s support and influence.
The Treasury Department did not respond to requests for comment regarding the Super Bowl advertisement or the ongoing controversy surrounding the program’s name.
The high-profile marketing push comes as the administration seeks to build public enthusiasm for the program ahead of its official operational launch on July 5, when American families will be able to begin registering newborns for the investment accounts.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
The high cost of Super Bowl ads is nothing new, but using that platform for a politically-charged government campaign is quite unusual. I hope there is robust public debate and oversight around this decision.
Agreed, this seems like an unorthodox and potentially concerning use of public funds. Transparency and accountability should be a priority.
The high price tag for this ad spot is striking. I wonder if there are more constructive ways the government could invest in supporting American families and economic growth.
Good point. $10 million could go a long way in funding important public services or infrastructure projects that benefit everyone.
While I respect the right to free speech, I’m concerned that this appears to be a blatant attempt to use taxpayer money for partisan political messaging during a major media event. That raises ethical questions in my view.
I share your concerns. Maintaining the integrity of government institutions and the political process should be a top priority.
It’s interesting to see the government getting involved in financial products like the “Trump Accounts.” I’d be curious to learn more about the rationale and intended benefits of this program.
Same here. Any new government initiative warrants close scrutiny to ensure it’s serving the public good, not just political interests.
While I appreciate the government’s efforts to engage with the public, promoting a specific political message during a major televised event raises red flags for me. I hope there are legitimate policy reasons behind this decision.
Valid concern. Government initiatives should aim to serve the broader public interest, not just partisan agendas.
This sounds like a concerning use of government funds to promote a partisan political agenda. I hope the details around the “Trump Accounts” program and the decision to air this ad during the Super Bowl are scrutinized closely.
Agreed, it’s important that any government initiatives are transparent and serve the broader public interest, not just a political faction.