Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Veteran actor Shatrughan Sinha has come to the defense of the film “Dhurandhar” amid growing criticism on social media platforms where some viewers have labeled it as propaganda. In a detailed statement shared on X (formerly Twitter), Sinha offered unwavering support for the spy action thriller, dismissing the propaganda allegations while highlighting what he considers the film’s artistic merits.

“What ‘propaganda’ film??? A film is a film is a film,” wrote the veteran actor in his passionate endorsement. “It’s a great film, gripping, interesting, and full of entertainment, made with sincerity.” He particularly praised the production design, noting how Thailand locations were transformed to convincingly depict Pakistani settings with remarkable authenticity.

Sinha’s comments come at a time when political undertones in mainstream Indian cinema have increasingly become the subject of heated debate among critics and audiences alike. The film industry has seen several recent productions facing similar scrutiny over their portrayal of geopolitical narratives.

In his detailed review, the actor highlighted technical elements of the production, singling out the cinematography and editing as particularly noteworthy. He reserved special praise for the film’s lead actor Ranveer Singh, describing his performance as “outstanding” and claiming he “fits the bill” perfectly for the role.

The ensemble cast also received acknowledgment, with Sinha mentioning Sanjay Dutt (whom he referred to as “worthy son of the most worthy father late and great Sunil Dutt”), Akshaye Khanna (son of legendary actor Vinod Khanna), and character actor Rakesh Bedi. Sinha described Bedi’s contribution as “the icing on the cake” with “a fine balancing act which only he could have done.”

Director Aditya Dhar, who previously gained critical acclaim for his work on “Uri: The Surgical Strike,” was lauded by Sinha as a “role model in cinema” and “most sought after, successful filmmaker.” Dhar’s directorial approach was credited for bringing out strong performances from the entire cast.

“Dhurandhar” represents a significant investment for Jio Studios and B62 Studios, the production companies behind the project. The film is reportedly the first installment of a planned two-part espionage series, with the narrative centered around counter-terrorism operations. The sequel is already scheduled for release on March 19, continuing the story of protagonist Jaskirat’s journey into the world of espionage.

The controversy surrounding “Dhurandhar” highlights the increasingly complex relationship between entertainment and political narratives in contemporary Indian cinema. Several high-profile Bollywood releases in recent years have faced similar scrutiny regarding their ideological positioning and historical interpretations.

Adding to the controversy, tech entrepreneur Sabeer Bhatia, co-founder of Hotmail, has reportedly criticized the film, calling it “disgusting” ahead of the sequel’s release—creating a stark contrast to Sinha’s effusive praise.

The film boasts an impressive ensemble that includes industry veterans alongside newer talents. Beyond the lead cast of Ranveer Singh, Akshaye Khanna, and Sanjay Dutt, the production also features Arjun Rampal and R. Madhavan in significant roles, bringing together multiple generations of Indian cinema talent.

With its December 5th release, “Dhurandhar” has generated substantial box office attention despite the controversy, demonstrating the ongoing commercial appeal of nationalist-themed action thrillers in the Indian market. The film’s marketing strategy, which Sinha specifically praised for its effective use of YouTube, has helped build a significant audience despite the polarized critical reception.

As the debate continues and the sequel approaches, “Dhurandhar” remains a talking point in industry circles, exemplifying the increasingly blurred lines between entertainment, politics, and public discourse in contemporary Indian cinema.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

7 Comments

  1. Interesting to see a veteran actor like Shatrughan Sinha come out in support of this film. While the ‘propaganda’ allegations are worth considering, his praise for the technical merits is intriguing. I’m curious to learn more about the nuances of the debate around political narratives in Indian cinema.

  2. William I. Brown on

    Veteran actors like Sinha can offer valuable insights on the creative process behind films. His comments highlight the complexity of navigating political themes in cinema. It will be interesting to see how audiences respond to the film’s technical and narrative elements.

  3. Olivia S. White on

    Sinha’s praise for the production design and cinematography is intriguing. While the ‘propaganda’ allegations shouldn’t be dismissed, his perspective as an experienced actor deserves consideration. It will be informative to follow the ongoing discourse around political narratives in Indian films.

  4. Lucas Thompson on

    While the ‘propaganda’ label is concerning, Sinha’s praise for the technical aspects of the film is noteworthy. As an experienced actor, his opinion carries weight. It will be interesting to see how this debate around political narratives in Indian cinema evolves.

  5. Jennifer Hernandez on

    The transformation of Thailand locations to depict Pakistani settings sounds quite impressive from a production standpoint. Sinha’s emphasis on the film’s entertainment value rather than political messaging is an interesting perspective. I’ll have to watch it with an open mind.

  6. Sinha’s staunch defense of the film’s artistic merits is thought-provoking. The line between political commentary and propaganda can be blurry, so it’s good to consider multiple viewpoints. I’ll reserve judgment until I’ve seen the film for myself.

  7. It’s always good to see creative talents defend their work, even in the face of controversy. Sinha’s comments highlight the subjective nature of assessing ‘propaganda’ in films. Audiences should form their own views based on the artistic merits, not just political undertones.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.