Listen to the article
The religious dimension of Russia’s Ukraine war is being leveraged as a powerful propaganda tool, according to Romanian war correspondent Alex Craiu. In a recent interview, Craiu revealed how Orthodox Christian rhetoric has become instrumental in framing the conflict as a “holy war” with moral and existential dimensions.
Craiu, who has been reporting from Ukraine’s frontlines since Russia’s full-scale invasion, explained that the Russian Orthodox Church frequently portrays the conflict in sacred terms. This religious framing serves to elevate the war beyond geopolitics into a defense of traditional values against perceived Western corruption.
“In Russia, the war is often framed in sacral terms, including as a ‘holy war,’ and justified as a defence of national existence,” Craiu noted. “Cultural elements tied to religion are portrayed as values that Russia is protecting.”
According to Craiu, this narrative deliberately positions Russia as the guardian of “morality as expressed through Orthodoxy” and “family values.” The Kremlin has specifically highlighted Ukraine’s progressive stance on LGBT rights as evidence that the country has abandoned traditional Orthodox values.
The religious dimension of the conflict has created complex dynamics inside Ukraine itself. Ukrainian authorities have uncovered instances of suspected collaboration between clergy and Russian forces. Craiu cited the case of Metropolitan Arseniy, head of the Sviatohirsk Lavra in Donetsk Oblast, who was issued a notice of suspicion for allegedly leaking locations of Ukrainian defense checkpoints—an action that could constitute wartime espionage.
These tensions reflect a broader struggle over religious identity in Ukraine. Since 2019, when the Orthodox Church of Ukraine received autocephaly (independence) from the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, there have been intensified efforts to distance Ukrainian Orthodox communities from their traditional Moscow affiliation.
Russia has exploited these religious divisions as part of its propaganda strategy, particularly in regions with ethnic complexity. Craiu highlighted Chernivtsi Oblast, which borders Romania, as a notable example. “Russian narratives have emphasized two issues: ethnicity and religion,” he explained. “Propaganda has promoted the claim that Romanian minorities in the region are being discriminated against by the Ukrainian government, thereby attempting to strain Ukraine-Romania relations.”
This strategy involves portraying Moscow-affiliated church structures as the legitimate representatives of Romanian ethnic identity in the region—effectively using religion as a wedge to create divisions and advance Russian interests.
When asked about the physical impact of the war on religious sites, Craiu indicated that while churches have been damaged throughout the conflict, they appear to be casualties of broader bombardment rather than specific targets. The Transfiguration Cathedral in Odesa, which suffered significant damage during a Russian missile strike in July 2023, stands as a prominent example.
“Religious buildings have been damaged or destroyed during the war, sometimes as part of broader strikes and sometimes under disputed circumstances,” Craiu said. “I have not observed evidence that churches are targeted at a significantly higher rate than residential or other civilian structures.”
Craiu’s observations shed light on how religious discourse serves dual purposes in this conflict: as spiritual validation for military action and as a vehicle for propaganda that can shape public perception, particularly in rural communities where clergy maintain significant influence.
The weaponization of religion underscores the multidimensional nature of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, where battles are fought not only on physical terrain but also through competing narratives about cultural identity, values, and faith.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
This interview provides valuable insights into the Kremlin’s propaganda strategy. Unpacking the religious dimensions of the conflict is crucial for understanding the broader geopolitical dynamics at play.
Yes, this type of analysis is essential for countering the Kremlin’s efforts to reframe the Ukraine war in religious terms.
Interesting perspective on how Russia is using religious rhetoric to frame the conflict in Ukraine as a ‘holy war.’ It’s concerning to see how the Russian Orthodox Church is being leveraged for propaganda purposes.
I’m curious to learn more about how this religious rhetoric is being used to target specific audiences, both within Russia and internationally. Understanding the nuances of this propaganda strategy could provide important insights.
This report highlights the complex interplay between religion, nationalism, and propaganda in the context of the Ukraine war. It’s a sobering reminder of the potential for religious rhetoric to be misused for nefarious purposes.
This religious framing of the war highlights how Russia is trying to portray itself as the defender of ‘traditional values’ against perceived Western corruption. It’s a concerning tactic to stoke nationalist sentiment.
Framing the war in Ukraine as a ‘holy war’ is a dangerous tactic that could further inflame tensions and make the conflict even more intractable. Maintaining a clear separation between religion and geopolitics is crucial.
The Russian Orthodox Church’s role in this conflict raises important questions about the relationship between religion and state power. It’s a concerning development that deserves close scrutiny.
The idea of Russia protecting ‘family values’ and ‘morality as expressed through Orthodoxy’ is troubling, given the authoritarian nature of the Russian regime. Invoking religion to justify military aggression is deeply problematic.
The Russian Orthodox Church’s role in this conflict raises important questions about the relationship between religion and state power. How can religious institutions avoid being co-opted for political ends?
The use of ‘family values’ and ‘traditional Orthodoxy’ as justification for military aggression is deeply troubling. It’s a cynical attempt to cloak the war in a veneer of moral righteousness.
Agreed. Using religion as a pretext for war is a dangerous and manipulative tactic that must be condemned.