Listen to the article
Russian authorities closed Aleksey Ivliyev’s Moscow school after his anti-war stance became too troublesome for the Kremlin
In a small classroom in Moscow, Aleksey Ivliyev was once known to his students as “Mr. Nobody” – a nickname that belied his growing significance in Russia’s struggle between educational freedom and state propaganda.
Ivliyev, 42, founded the “Kocherga” school eight years ago as an alternative to Russia’s increasingly militarized public education system. His institution became a rare sanctuary where critical thinking was encouraged rather than suppressed, until authorities finally forced its closure this summer.
“I wanted to create a space where children could develop freely,” Ivliyev told reporters from his current location in Armenia, where he fled after facing mounting pressure from Russian officials. “Education should prepare students to think independently, not to blindly follow state ideology.”
The conflict between Ivliyev’s educational philosophy and the Kremlin’s agenda intensified dramatically following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. While public schools across Russia implemented mandatory “patriotic education” lessons glorifying the war – officially termed a “special military operation” – Kocherga remained steadfastly committed to teaching critical analysis.
Russia’s Ministry of Education has introduced increasingly nationalistic elements into school curricula since 2022, including weekly “Important Conversations” classes that promote government narratives about the war. Students as young as six are now taught military drills, while history textbooks have been rewritten to justify the invasion of Ukraine.
“The authorities are systematically militarizing children’s minds,” explained Maria Kravchenko, an education analyst who monitors propaganda in Russian schools. “Independent schools like Kocherga became targets precisely because they refused to participate in this indoctrination.”
Ivliyev’s troubles escalated when education officials conducted multiple inspections of his school, citing anonymous complaints. The pressure intensified after Kocherga refused to display posters supporting Russian troops or participate in state-organized patriotic events.
“They didn’t find any violations of educational standards, so they scrutinized our fire safety protocols, building codes – anything to create problems,” Ivliyev recounted. “The message was clear: conform or close.”
Parents who chose Kocherga for their children now face difficult decisions. Natalya Sorokina, whose 12-year-old daughter attended the school for three years, described the institution as “an island of sanity” in Russia’s educational landscape.
“At Kocherga, my daughter learned to question information and think logically. These are dangerous skills in today’s Russia,” Sorokina said. “Now we’re considering leaving the country because the alternatives are unacceptable to us.”
The closure of Kocherga reflects a broader crackdown on educational independence across Russia. Since February 2022, authorities have intensified efforts to control educational narratives, with teachers being fired for expressing anti-war sentiments and students facing expulsion for questioning official information.
According to OVD-Info, a Russian human rights organization, at least 97 teachers have been dismissed or forced to resign due to their political positions in the past two years. Additionally, dozens of private schools have been subjected to extraordinary inspections, resulting in many closures.
The Russian government defends these measures as necessary to protect children from “harmful foreign influences” and to instill patriotic values. Education Minister Sergei Kravtsov has repeatedly emphasized the importance of teaching students to “love their homeland” and “understand Russia’s special historical mission.”
Despite the risks, some educators continue resisting state pressure. Underground networks of teachers share resources for teaching critical thinking, while some parents organize home-schooling cooperatives to avoid the increasingly militaristic public education system.
Ivliyev, now establishing a new school for Russian expatriate children in Yerevan, Armenia, remains committed to his educational principles.
“The authorities can close buildings, but they can’t stop the spread of ideas,” he said. “Today’s students will someday determine Russia’s future. Our job is to ensure they have the tools to think for themselves when that time comes.”
Education experts warn that Russia’s current approach may have long-term consequences for the country’s development. Studies have consistently shown that critical thinking skills are essential for innovation and economic advancement in the 21st century.
“By prioritizing ideological conformity over intellectual curiosity, Russia is potentially sacrificing its future competitiveness,” said Pavel Litvakov, an education policy researcher. “The teachers who resist this trend, like Ivliyev, are actually the true patriots – they’re fighting for Russia’s long-term prosperity.”
As the new school year begins in Russia, the space for educational freedom continues to narrow, leaving parents, teachers, and students facing increasingly difficult choices between conformity and conscience.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


8 Comments
This story raises important questions about the role of education in promoting independent thought versus reinforcing state ideology. It will be interesting to see if other educators in Russia follow Mr. Ivliyev’s example in challenging the Kremlin’s agenda.
It’s troubling to see the Kremlin’s efforts to tighten control over education and suppress alternative viewpoints. Schools should foster independent thought, not blind obedience to state ideology.
I agree. A diversity of educational approaches is essential for a healthy society. Shutting down schools like Mr. Ivliyev’s is a worrying sign of the Kremlin’s intolerance for dissent.
This story highlights the crucial role of independent educators in countering state propaganda. Mr. Ivliyev’s courageous stance for critical thinking is admirable, despite the pressure he faced from Russian authorities.
The Kremlin’s efforts to indoctrinate students through mandatory ‘patriotic education’ lessons are deeply troubling. Mr. Ivliyev’s school provided a valuable alternative, and its closure is a setback for educational freedom in Russia.
I’m curious to learn more about the tactics Russian authorities used to pressure and ultimately shut down Mr. Ivliyev’s school. What does this case reveal about the state’s efforts to control the narrative in education?
While the closure of Mr. Ivliyev’s school is concerning, it’s heartening to see that he was able to continue his work in Armenia. Preserving spaces for critical thinking is essential, even in the face of authoritarian crackdowns.
The conflict between Mr. Ivliyev’s educational philosophy and the Kremlin’s agenda highlights the broader struggle for intellectual freedom in Russia. It’s admirable that he persisted in providing a space for critical thinking, even in the face of mounting pressure.