Listen to the article
Russian officials have forcefully denied recent Western allegations that Alexey Navalny was poisoned with a frog-derived toxin, dismissing the claims as a coordinated propaganda effort designed to distract from other international issues.
Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova challenged the assertions made by five European nations, demanding concrete evidence before acknowledging any poisoning allegations. “When the test results are available and the formulas for the substances are disclosed, we will comment accordingly,” Zakharova said, according to Russian state news agency TASS.
“Until then, all such assertions are merely propaganda aimed at diverting attention from pressing Western issues,” she added, suggesting the timing of these allegations follows a familiar pattern of deflection from Western governments.
Zakharova specifically questioned why these claims have emerged now, drawing parallels to previous high-profile poisoning allegations. “Just as the investigation into the Nord Stream explosions was about to yield results, suddenly Navalny’s poisoning is brought into focus,” she noted. “When asked for Navalny’s test results, Western officials instead circulated sensational stories about the Skripals. This pattern continues unabated.”
Her reference to the Skripals recalls the 2018 poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in the United Kingdom, which sparked a major diplomatic crisis between Russia and Western nations.
The latest allegations surfaced on February 14, when Germany, Britain, the Netherlands, Sweden, and France issued a joint statement claiming that Navalny was poisoned with epibatidine, a potent neurotoxin derived from the skin of the Ecuadorian poison dart frog. According to their statement, this conclusion was based on analyses of Navalny’s biological samples obtained after his reported illness.
The five European nations accused Russia of violating the Chemical Weapons Convention in connection with the incident, a serious allegation that could have diplomatic repercussions.
Navalny, who is officially designated as a terrorist and extremist in Russia according to Russian law, was a prominent opposition figure and anti-corruption activist. His case has been a persistent source of tension between Russia and Western nations.
The poisoning claims come amid already strained relations between Russia and Western countries, particularly following Russia’s military operation in Ukraine and ongoing disagreements over the Nord Stream pipeline explosions in the Baltic Sea.
The Nord Stream pipelines, designed to transport Russian natural gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea, were damaged by explosions in September 2022. Various nations have conducted investigations into these incidents, with differing conclusions about responsibility. Zakharova’s comments suggest Russia views the timing of the Navalny poisoning allegations as an attempt to divert attention from these investigations.
The use of epibatidine would be particularly unusual if confirmed. The toxin, found in the skin secretions of certain poison dart frogs native to Ecuador, acts on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the nervous system and can cause paralysis and respiratory failure. Its presence would raise questions about how such a rare substance would be obtained and deployed.
As international tensions continue to simmer, the conflicting narratives surrounding Navalny’s case highlight the deep divide in trust and communication between Russia and Western nations, with each side accusing the other of misinformation and political manipulation.
Russian officials maintain that without transparent disclosure of test results and scientific evidence, the Western allegations remain unsubstantiated and politically motivated.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


29 Comments
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Interesting update on Russia Dismisses Navalny Poisoning Claims as Western Propaganda. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
Production mix shifting toward Propaganda might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Production mix shifting toward Propaganda might help margins if metals stay firm.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.