Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Russia’s information warfare represents a new front in its geopolitical strategy, according to political scientist Wojciech Kotowicz from the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, who warns that Moscow now treats information “as a weapon with strategic range.”

This approach has been developed as Russia acknowledges NATO’s military and economic advantages, pushing the Kremlin to find alternative battlefields where it can compete more effectively against Western powers.

“Today’s conflict between Russia and the West is taking place primarily in the informational and cognitive space,” Kotowicz explained in recent statements following extensive research into Russian disinformation campaigns. “This is a war that does not require tanks or airplanes. To achieve strategic aims, a smartphone, a social media account and a well-constructed narrative are enough.”

The political scientist describes these developments as evidence of a “new Cold War” – one that relies less on conventional military hardware and more on narrative control and perception management. This shift toward information warfare reflects Russia’s adaptation to 21st-century geopolitical realities, where direct military confrontation with NATO would be disadvantageous.

Kotowicz’s insights stem from a comprehensive research project conducted last year by the university’s Institute of Political Science. The study examined how Russian disinformation shapes public opinion in Eastern Europe, with particular focus on Moldova and Georgia, and explored potential countermeasures that governments and civil society organizations might implement.

During fieldwork in 2025, researchers witnessed firsthand the impact of Russian operations. Kotowicz recounted interviews in Moldova’s capital, Chișinău, where journalists described dramatic shifts in voter attitudes. Older citizens who had long supported European integration suddenly began embracing anti-EU narratives claiming that the European Union threatened traditional values and sought to seize land.

“This change did not happen by accident,” Kotowicz emphasized. It followed coordinated campaigns distributed through social media, Russian-language television, and seemingly independent commentators who were actually operating within networks financed from Moscow.

The stakes for countries like Poland are particularly high, according to the researcher. He argues that Warsaw’s information security is inextricably linked to the stability of its eastern partners.

“If we allow disinformation to triumph in Moldova, Poland will become the next, direct target of even more aggressive information campaigns,” Kotowicz warned, suggesting that successful Russian influence operations in neighboring states could quickly pivot toward Poland itself.

The Moldovan referendum on European integration demonstrated the potency of these tactics. While the pro-European position ultimately prevailed, it did so by a surprisingly narrow margin after what Kotowicz described as “an unprecedented wave of disinformation and vote-buying.” Experts consulted during the research believed that support for European integration would have been significantly higher without Russian interference.

Social media platforms have emerged as particularly powerful vectors for these influence operations. Kotowicz specifically identified Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and TikTok as examples, noting that their algorithms inadvertently amplify divisive content that generates strong emotional responses.

“The battlefield becomes our perception of reality, our beliefs, our trust in democratic institutions,” he explained. Russia’s strategic objective appears to be eroding trust in democratic systems and Western alliances – outcomes that serve Moscow’s interests without requiring territorial occupation.

Looking ahead, Kotowicz warns that countries should expect Russian disinformation to intensify and evolve, employing increasingly sophisticated technologies while adapting to defensive measures. He has already identified a new wave of Russian messaging circulating throughout Europe in 2026, focusing on energy concerns and promoting narratives that sanctions harm European economies more than Russia itself.

These claims suggest European leaders are deliberately impoverishing their societies – a narrative designed to stoke internal divisions within Western democracies and undermine support for continued pressure on Moscow.

As this information war continues to evolve, Kotowicz’s research underscores the urgent need for coordinated responses from European governments, media literacy initiatives, and social media platforms to identify and counter these sophisticated influence operations.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

17 Comments

  1. The shift towards information warfare is a troubling development, but not entirely unexpected given Russia’s history of leveraging disinformation and propaganda. Maintaining public trust and a strong, fact-based narrative will be key to countering these threats.

  2. This article underscores the growing importance of information warfare as a strategic tool, particularly for nations like Russia that face military and economic disadvantages. Democracies must remain vigilant and invest in strengthening their cognitive defenses to counter these evolving threats.

  3. William Garcia on

    The rise of information warfare as a strategic tool is a worrying trend that requires a robust and coordinated response from the international community. Protecting the integrity of public discourse is essential for maintaining democratic resilience.

  4. Michael Miller on

    Russia’s reliance on information warfare as a strategic tool reflects its acknowledgment of NATO’s military and economic advantages. This shift underscores the need for democracies to prioritize investments in cognitive and digital defenses to maintain their competitive edge.

  5. This article highlights the need for a comprehensive, multilateral approach to combating Russia’s information warfare tactics. Strengthening digital literacy, fact-checking capabilities, and international cooperation will be crucial to safeguarding democratic institutions and public discourse.

    • Agreed. Democracies must work together to develop robust frameworks and tools to identify, expose, and counter the spread of false narratives and propaganda. Protecting the integrity of information is essential for maintaining public trust and resilience.

  6. Olivia Johnson on

    Russia’s reliance on information warfare reflects its acknowledgment of NATO’s military superiority. This shift in strategy highlights the importance of bolstering our defenses in the digital and cognitive domains to counter these new threats.

    • Absolutely. Democracies must prioritize investments in digital literacy, media analysis, and fact-based communication to ensure they can effectively combat Russia’s information warfare campaigns.

  7. The article highlights the evolving nature of geopolitical competition, where information and perception management have become key battlegrounds. Democracies must adapt their approaches to effectively counter these new forms of information warfare and protect the integrity of public discourse.

    • Emma Rodriguez on

      Well said. Winning the war of ideas and narratives will be just as important as traditional military and economic might in the years ahead. Developing robust digital literacy programs and fact-checking capabilities will be crucial for democracies to succeed in this new era of geopolitical competition.

  8. Patricia Garcia on

    This is a concerning development, as information warfare can be just as damaging as traditional military conflict. We must remain vigilant against Russian disinformation campaigns and strengthen our defenses in the cognitive domain.

    • Michael P. Davis on

      Agreed. Countering this new form of warfare requires a multi-pronged approach, including media literacy, fact-checking, and international cooperation to expose and debunk false narratives.

  9. Linda A. Williams on

    This article underscores the evolving nature of geopolitical competition in the 21st century. As Russia adapts to the new realities, democracies must also transform their approaches to ensure they can effectively counter these information-based threats.

    • Well said. Winning the battle of narratives and perceptions will be crucial in the years ahead. Democracies must invest in media literacy, fact-checking, and strategic communication to stay ahead of adversaries like Russia.

  10. While concerning, this development is not entirely surprising. Russia has long leveraged disinformation and propaganda to advance its interests. The key is to remain vigilant, expose their tactics, and empower citizens to be critical consumers of information.

  11. Linda N. Lopez on

    Russia’s shift towards information warfare highlights the evolving nature of geopolitical competition in the 21st century. Maintaining public trust and a strong, fact-based narrative will be crucial for democracies to prevail in this new battleground.

    • Absolutely. Winning the war of ideas and perceptions may be just as important as traditional military and economic power in the years ahead. Democracies must rise to this challenge.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.