Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Pakistan’s Intelligence Agency Recruits Foreign Influencers to Counter India’s Narrative

NEW DELHI – Pakistan’s intelligence services have intensified efforts to reshape international perceptions following what Indian sources refer to as “Operation Sindoor,” a development that reportedly caused significant embarrassment to Islamabad in diplomatic circles.

According to intelligence sources, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) has established a specialized cell dedicated to identifying and recruiting social media influencers who can disseminate pro-Pakistan narratives while simultaneously attempting to damage India’s international standing.

The dedicated ISI cell reportedly focuses on carefully selecting individuals with substantial online followings who can be persuaded to create content aligned with Pakistan’s strategic messaging objectives. These operations appear to be part of a broader information warfare campaign aimed at countering India’s diplomatic and media narratives.

Indian security agencies have recently taken action against several domestic content creators allegedly involved in such activities. The arrest of journalist Jyoti Malhotra following the Pahalgam attack marked a significant development in India’s counterintelligence operations. The Pahalgam incident, which occurred in Kashmir, prompted intensified scrutiny of potential foreign influence operations within India’s media ecosystem.

In what appears to be an evolution of tactics, intelligence sources now indicate the ISI has shifted focus toward recruiting foreign nationals as influencers. This new approach potentially offers Pakistan plausible deniability while allowing messages to reach international audiences through voices perceived as more neutral or credible than Pakistani state media.

The recruitment of foreign influencers represents a sophisticated evolution in information warfare techniques. By leveraging individuals without obvious connections to Pakistan, the ISI can potentially circumvent the immediate skepticism that might greet official Pakistani sources when discussing India-Pakistan relations.

This development comes amid ongoing tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors, whose relationship has remained strained over territorial disputes, terrorism allegations, and competing regional interests. The Kashmir region, claimed by both countries, continues to be a flashpoint in bilateral relations.

Media and information warfare has increasingly become a crucial battlefield in the India-Pakistan rivalry, with both sides investing in capabilities to shape international perceptions. The rise of social media platforms has created new avenues for intelligence agencies to conduct influence operations across borders with relatively low costs and high potential impact.

Intelligence experts suggest that these influence operations aim to sway public opinion not only within India but also in Western nations that maintain significant diplomatic and economic ties with both countries. By shaping narratives around human rights, democracy, and regional security, foreign intelligence services can potentially influence policy decisions in major capitals.

Indian security agencies have reportedly enhanced monitoring of suspicious social media activities, particularly content that appears designed to inflame communal tensions or undermine public trust in government institutions. However, this surveillance has raised concerns among press freedom advocates who warn about potential impacts on legitimate journalism.

The ongoing information battle highlights the evolving nature of national security challenges in the digital age, where perceptions can be as strategically important as physical borders. As both nations continue to compete for influence across the region, these digital influence operations are likely to remain a significant aspect of their rivalry.

Neither the Pakistani embassy nor ISI representatives have responded to requests for comment on these allegations.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. While I understand the desire to counter perceived biases, recruiting foreign influencers to spread propaganda is a dangerous path. Transparent, fact-based dialogue is essential for resolving conflicts between nations.

    • Absolutely. Resorting to manipulative tactics often backfires and erodes trust. The long-term solution lies in open and honest communication, not deceptive information warfare.

  2. Amelia R. Johnson on

    This story underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in the realm of online influence operations. We must work to ensure that social media platforms are not exploited for political gain.

  3. Amelia Johnson on

    This news highlights the growing challenge of combating online disinformation campaigns. It’s a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach involving tech companies, governments, and civil society.

  4. The alleged recruitment of international influencers by Pakistan’s intelligence agency is concerning. However, we should avoid knee-jerk reactions and instead focus on promoting media literacy and critical thinking.

    • Lucas G. Martinez on

      Agreed. Maintaining a balanced and impartial perspective is crucial when dealing with sensitive geopolitical issues like this. Fostering constructive dialogue is the best way forward.

  5. Patricia Martin on

    This is concerning news about Pakistan’s attempts to influence global narratives through social media. It’s crucial that we remain vigilant and fact-check information from all sources, regardless of which country it originates from.

    • Linda X. Garcia on

      Agreed. Disinformation campaigns can have serious consequences, so it’s vital that we scrutinize claims and maintain objectivity when it comes to geopolitical issues.

  6. While I’m disturbed by the reported attempts to manipulate global narratives, I believe the best response is to continue upholding the values of free speech and democratic discourse. Censorship is not the answer.

    • Well said. The solution lies in strengthening media literacy and critical thinking, not in suppressing information. We must remain vigilant but also committed to principles of openness and truth.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.