Listen to the article
North Korean Citizens Lose Access to Outside Information as US and South Korea Halt Broadcasts
Tens of thousands of North Koreans have lost their window to the outside world after both the United States and South Korean governments suspended media operations broadcasting into the isolated nation.
“This is very bad for the people of North Korea and a really serious step backwards for human rights there,” said Kim Eu Jin, who fled North Korea with her mother and sister in the 1990s. “The governments are denying the North Korean people freedom of access to information and now they will only hear Pyongyang’s propaganda.”
Until recently, North Koreans could secretly listen to Radio Free Asia and Voice of America from the United States, as well as South Korea’s “Voice of Freedom.” These broadcasts provided crucial alternative information that contradicted the regime’s tightly controlled narrative, according to activists who work with North Korean defectors.
The consequences for North Koreans caught listening to foreign broadcasts have always been severe. The Pyongyang regime invests significant resources in detecting and punishing citizens who access outside media. Those caught can face public trials, hard labor sentences, or even execution in extreme cases. Kim noted that she never dared listen to foreign radio before fleeing her homeland because “it was simply too dangerous.”
The media blackout began earlier this year when Donald Trump returned to the White House. His administration quickly dismantled the US Agency for Global Media, the parent organization of Voice of America and Radio Free Asia, laying off hundreds of employees in the process.
South Korea followed suit in late August, announcing it would cease broadcasting “Voice of Freedom” into the northern part of the Korean Peninsula after 15 years of operation. Seoul also dismantled the massive speaker systems along the border that had broadcast news and South Korean pop music northward.
The South Korean government justified its decision as an attempt to reduce tensions with North Korea, expressing hope that Pyongyang might be willing to reopen negotiations. However, analysts note there has been no indication that North Korea is considering resuming talks with Seoul.
In late October, Rosa Hwang, executive editor of Radio Free Asia, announced the suspension of operations due to “uncertain funding” — marking the first shutdown in the network’s 29-year history.
“The newsroom is in the dark. The microphones are off. The broadcasts are muted. Publishing is paused. On social media. On our websites,” Hwang stated. She emphasized that without this radio service, 26 million North Koreans would lack a crucial link to independent information.
The 38 North portal, which specializes in North Korean analysis, recently investigated the impact of these closures. Their research revealed that anti-regime radio programs have dropped by 85 percent, while television programs targeting North Korean audiences have been completely shut down due to cuts imposed by the US and South Korean governments.
Though precise audience numbers within North Korea remain difficult to determine, analysts point to the significant resources the North Korean regime has invested in jamming these broadcasts as evidence of their reach and effectiveness.
North Korea has grown increasingly sophisticated in blocking outside broadcasts and has implemented stricter legal measures to prevent information access. The Anti-Reactionary Thought and Culture Law, passed in 2020, exemplifies how seriously the regime views external information as a threat to its authority.
“I’m sure the government in Pyongyang is very happy about this development,” said Lim Eun-jung, a professor of international studies at Kongju National University. “Shutting down these shows means that people can now only consume North Korean state media and will know less and less about what is happening in the outside world.”
Lim expressed qualified understanding for South Korea’s strategic decision, noting Seoul’s desire to avoid escalating tensions. However, she emphasized that the consequence is further isolation for North Koreans, who already live in what she described as “essentially like a prison.”
For defectors like Kim, the broadcasts represented more than just news—they were educational tools about fundamental concepts. “The shows taught people in North Korea what human rights are. That program showed them what freedom means. It made some fight for that freedom by leaving the North,” she said. “I can’t understand why we are now doing the regime’s job by stopping the broadcast of that program.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
This move by the US and South Korea, while likely well-intentioned, may end up backfiring and further isolating the North Korean people. They need more exposure to outside information, not less, to counter the regime’s propaganda.
I share your concerns. Restricting access to alternative media sources could have unintended consequences and play right into the hands of the North Korean authorities.
It’s disheartening to see the North Korean people losing even the limited access to outside information they previously had. This will only embolden the regime’s propaganda efforts and make it harder for citizens to learn the truth.
Absolutely. Cutting off foreign media broadcasts denies North Koreans the chance to hear perspectives beyond the regime’s official line. It’s a worrying erosion of basic freedoms.
The North Korean regime’s obsession with controlling information flows is deeply troubling. Depriving citizens of access to foreign media is a blatant violation of their right to freedom of expression and access to information.
You’re absolutely right. This is a disturbing development that will only empower the North Korean government’s propaganda efforts and further curtail the basic rights of its people.
The North Korean regime seems determined to maintain its tight control over the narrative at all costs. Denying citizens access to alternative information sources is a troubling violation of basic human rights.
You’re right, this is a serious setback for freedom of information in North Korea. The regime will go to great lengths to suppress any views that challenge its narrative.
This is a concerning move that will only strengthen the North Korean regime’s stranglehold on information. Depriving citizens of access to alternative media sources is a clear violation of their basic human rights.
I agree, this is a worrying development that will have serious consequences for the North Korean people. Cutting off access to outside information is a hallmark of authoritarian control.
It’s disheartening to see the North Korean people losing even limited access to outside information. This will make it even harder for them to challenge the regime’s narrative and learn about the world beyond their borders.
Sadly, this is yet another example of the North Korean government’s efforts to maintain its iron grip on power by controlling the flow of information. The people deserve greater freedoms, not further isolation.
This is a concerning development for the people of North Korea. Cutting off access to outside media will only strengthen the regime’s grip on information and propaganda. It’s a stark reminder of the human rights challenges in the country.
Agreed. The North Korean people deserve greater freedom and transparency, not further isolation. Restricting information flow is a hallmark of authoritarian control.