Listen to the article
A fire erupted today at a prominent Moscow media complex housing several influential pro-Kremlin outlets, forcing an emergency evacuation of the building that serves as a central hub for Russian state propaganda.
Dark smoke billowed from the Izvestia building on Partiyny Lane, which houses multiple media organizations under the National Media Group umbrella. The conglomerate is led by Alina Kabaeva, 42, widely reported to be Russian President Vladimir Putin’s partner, though the Kremlin has consistently denied this relationship.
Emergency services quickly responded to the blaze, which affected facilities housing the Izvestia newspaper, REN TV, Channel Five, Tsargrad, and Regnum—all outlets known for their unwavering support of the Kremlin’s policies and narratives. Sources close to the situation indicated the fire was classified at an elevated severity level, prompting immediate evacuation protocols.
According to official reports, the fire originated in a sauna at the Aquastar fitness club located on the third floor of the complex. “Firefighters rushed to the scene as people were led out of the building,” one witness reported. Multiple units from Russia’s Emergency Situations Ministry were deployed to combat the blaze, while ambulance crews, including specialized resuscitation teams, remained on standby throughout the incident.
No casualties were immediately reported, and later updates indicated that emergency responders had successfully contained the fire. Authorities have not yet released information about the extent of damage to the building or whether normal operations have resumed.
The National Media Group represents one of Russia’s largest media holdings and plays a crucial role in the Kremlin’s information ecosystem. Under Kabaeva’s leadership, these outlets consistently promote narratives aligned with Putin’s domestic and foreign policy objectives, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
This incident comes amid heightened tensions between Russia and NATO, exemplified by a disturbing incident on state television that occurred within hours of the fire. Vladimir Solovyov, one of Russia’s most prominent propagandists and a staunch Putin ally, issued what appeared to be a death threat toward NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during a broadcast on the state-owned Rossiya 1 channel.
Solovyov’s comments came in response to Rutte’s recent visit to Kyiv. The propagandist referenced remarks by State Duma Deputy Pyotr Tolstoy regarding the possibility of NATO forces entering Ukraine, saying: “And then, they lead NATO troops in. And what will be the response? Maybe you should ask Russia? And in response, we will kill all of you.”
He directed his most chilling remarks personally at Rutte: “Rutte, do you want to enter along with the contingent? Well, just to share its fate? Spring will come, right? And flowers will probably rise on your little grave… if they find it.”
These inflammatory statements reflect the increasingly hostile rhetoric emanating from Russian state media as the conflict in Ukraine continues into its third year. Russian propagandists like Solovyov frequently employ threatening language toward Western leaders and NATO officials on state television, part of a broader information strategy aimed at both domestic and international audiences.
The fire at this key propaganda center occurs against a backdrop of occasional unexplained incidents at strategic Russian facilities since the beginning of the Ukraine conflict, though there is no immediate indication of foul play in this case. Russian authorities typically conduct investigations into such incidents but rarely release comprehensive findings to the public.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


14 Comments
Interesting that a fire would break out at a major pro-Kremlin media hub. I wonder if it was just an accident or something more sinister. Curious to see what the investigation turns up.
Yes, this certainly raises some questions. I agree, it will be important to understand the cause and any potential implications.
This is an intriguing development. While accidents do happen, the optics of a fire at a Kremlin-linked media hub are quite concerning. I’ll be following this story closely.
Yes, the timing and location make this a very sensitive situation. I hope the investigation is transparent and comprehensive.
A fire at the heart of Russia’s state-run propaganda machine is certainly an intriguing development. I’m curious to see what the official investigation uncovers and whether there are any hints of foul play.
Yes, this bears close watching. The potential for political intrigue or internal power struggles makes this a story worth following closely in the coming days and weeks.
This is a rather suspicious incident. With the Kremlin’s tight control over the media, a fire at one of their main propaganda hubs raises many questions. I hope the truth comes to light.
Agreed. Transparency and accountability will be critical in determining the cause and any potential implications. This bears close watching.
A fire at a major Russian propaganda center is certainly eyebrow-raising. I wonder if this could be some kind of internal power struggle or attempt to disrupt their operations.
That’s an interesting theory. Given the high-profile nature of these outlets, a simple accident seems unlikely. I agree, further investigation is warranted.
While fires can certainly happen by chance, the fact that this occurred at a facility housing multiple pro-Kremlin outlets is quite troubling. I hope the authorities conduct a thorough and impartial investigation.
Absolutely. Given the sensitive nature of these media organizations, any potential foul play or internal conflicts could have broader ramifications. A full accounting is necessary.
Given the sensitive nature of these outlets, a fire at this location seems quite suspicious. I hope the authorities conduct a thorough investigation to determine the true cause.
Absolutely. With the potential ties to Putin’s inner circle, this merits close scrutiny. The public deserves answers.