Listen to the article
In a move to safeguard its information space, Latvia has blocked access to five more Russian websites deemed to be spreading propaganda, continuing its efforts to counter Russian influence in the Baltic region.
The National Council for Electronic Media (NCEM) announced the closure of access to “buryatia.mid.ru,” “eurasiaru.org,” “19rusinfo.ru,” “historyrussia.org,” and “rshu.ru” following intelligence from a competent state authority. Officials determined that content on these platforms poses a threat to Latvia’s information security and national interests.
According to the NCEM, these websites disseminate biased and one-sided narratives about Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine. They allegedly work to mobilize informational support for Russian military personnel engaged in the conflict while promoting favorable interpretations of Russian history and fostering positive sentiment toward Moscow.
The Latvian media regulator expressed particular concern about the websites’ potential to undermine social cohesion within the country. Officials warned that such propaganda could negatively impact interethnic relations and weaken public support for Latvia’s sovereignty and independence, as well as solidarity with Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
“News of Buryatia,” which appears to be connected to one of the blocked domains, represents the kind of regional Russian media outlet that Baltic security experts have long identified as part of the Kremlin’s broader information operations. Buryatia is a republic in Russia’s Far East, and its representation in Russian state media often aligns with Moscow’s official positions.
The decision comes amid heightened tensions between Russia and NATO countries, particularly those along Russia’s western borders. Latvia, along with its Baltic neighbors Estonia and Lithuania, has been among the most vocal European supporters of Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in February 2022.
This is not an isolated action. The NCEM has previously implemented similar restrictions on Russian media outlets and websites, reflecting Latvia’s consistent policy of limiting what it considers harmful Russian information influence. Since 2022, Baltic nations have blocked numerous Russian television channels, news websites, and social media platforms.
Latvia’s aggressive stance against Russian information operations stems partly from its significant Russian-speaking minority, which constitutes approximately 25 percent of the population. Latvian authorities have expressed concerns that this demographic could be particularly vulnerable to Moscow’s messaging.
Media freedom watchdogs have acknowledged the exceptional security concerns facing frontline NATO states like Latvia, while still urging caution to ensure that legitimate journalism isn’t inadvertently restricted in the process of countering propaganda.
The Latvian government has maintained that these measures are necessary safeguards rather than censorship, pointing to Russia’s documented efforts to use information as a tool of hybrid warfare across Europe. Similar restrictions have been implemented across the European Union, though with varying degrees of severity.
Digital rights experts note that while website blocks can be circumvented through VPNs and other technologies, such official restrictions still limit the mainstream reach of targeted content and send a clear political signal about Latvia’s security priorities.
The blocked websites represent different facets of Russia’s information ecosystem, ranging from academic institutions to regional news sources and historical organizations, highlighting the diverse channels through which the Kremlin projects influence abroad.
As the conflict in Ukraine continues with no end in sight, Latvia’s information space is likely to remain a contested domain, with authorities maintaining vigilance against what they perceive as threats to national security and social cohesion.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
I’m glad to see Latvia taking a firm stance against Russian propaganda. These websites can have a corrosive effect on public discourse and undermine democratic institutions, so this action is warranted.
It will be interesting to see if other Baltic states or European countries follow suit in restricting access to similar Russian disinformation platforms.
While I appreciate Latvia’s efforts to safeguard its information space, I hope the government is being careful not to overreach and restrict legitimate news sources. Maintaining a free press is vital, even during times of heightened tensions.
As a resident of Latvia, I appreciate the government’s efforts to protect our information space from Russian disinformation. These propaganda websites can be quite insidious, so I support the decision to restrict access to them.
It’s important that the authorities continue to monitor the situation and adapt their approach as needed to ensure the effectiveness of these measures.
Blocking Russian propaganda websites is a necessary step, but I hope the Latvian government is also investing in media literacy programs and other initiatives to empower citizens to critically evaluate the information they consume.
It’s disappointing to see Russia continuing to spread disinformation and propaganda, even in neighboring countries like Latvia. I’m glad the Latvian authorities are taking steps to counter these harmful narratives.
Blocking access to these websites is a reasonable response, but I wonder if there are other ways to undermine Russian propaganda efforts without resorting to outright censorship.
Kudos to Latvia for taking action against these Russian disinformation websites. It’s crucial that countries counter the spread of harmful propaganda, especially amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
I’m curious to see if this measure will be effective in limiting the influence of these Russian outlets within Latvia. Monitoring the impacts will be important going forward.
The decision to block these Russian propaganda websites is understandable, given the potential threat they pose to Latvia’s information security and national interests. However, I hope the government is carefully considering the long-term implications of such measures.
Blocking Russian propaganda websites is a necessary step to protect Latvia’s information space and national interests. These platforms often push biased narratives and undermine social cohesion, so I can understand the government’s concerns.
It’s a tricky balance between free speech and national security. As long as the process is transparent and doesn’t unnecessarily restrict legitimate journalism, this seems like a prudent move.