Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

When Donald Trump first announced his presidential candidacy in 2015, his campaign lacked traditional structure. Among his early hires was Corey Lewandowski, a lobbyist and former police officer who became his campaign manager. Though Trump initially appreciated Lewandowski’s combative style and irreverent humor, he eventually fired him after an incident involving a reporter. Lewandowski’s journey back to Trump’s inner circle would take several years and involve a controversial relationship with South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem.

In 2019, Lewandowski met Noem during a fishing trip hosted by conservative billionaire Foster Friess. The two reportedly developed an immediate rapport, with Lewandowski soon serving as her unpaid adviser. Almost immediately, rumors of an affair began circulating, despite both being married to other people. Noem dismissed these allegations as “total garbage” when they became public.

Their professional relationship hit a roadblock when Lewandowski was accused of sexually harassing a Republican donor at a 2021 Las Vegas charity event. This scandal, combined with Noem’s own controversies—including allegations she used her influence to help her daughter obtain a real estate appraiser certification—led to Noem announcing that Lewandowski would no longer work with her.

The separation proved temporary. While Noem had been considered a strong contender to be Trump’s running mate in 2024, her chances evaporated after she revealed in her memoir that she had shot her own dog for behavioral issues—a story that proved too disturbing even for typically unfazed Republican voters.

Meanwhile, Lewandowski managed to work his way back into Trump’s 2024 campaign, reportedly creating friction with the established campaign leadership under co-managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita. Behind the scenes, according to an exposé by Ben Terris in New York Magazine, Lewandowski and Noem were planning her political resurrection.

Their scheme centered on securing Noem a cabinet position in Trump’s administration. While Trump initially offered her the Interior or Agriculture departments, she held out for Homeland Security, which she correctly identified as Trump’s top priority. Trump eventually agreed, though with a significant caveat: Stephen Miller, appointed as White House homeland security adviser and deputy chief of staff, would oversee immigration policy—the department’s most visible function under Trump.

This arrangement has created an unusual power dynamic at DHS. While Noem serves as the department’s public face, Lewandowski has reportedly stepped back into his role as her unpaid adviser, functioning as her enforcer. The management structure has created significant operational problems, with Lewandowski reportedly requiring personal approval for all contracts over $100,000, creating payment backlogs so severe that the department nearly had its electricity cut off.

The department has shifted its focus dramatically, pouring resources into immigration enforcement while reportedly neglecting counterterrorism, FEMA, and cybersecurity. According to sources in Terris’s reporting, Lewandowski has created a hostile work environment, firing employees who cross him—even loyal Trump supporters—and demanding polygraph tests from those he suspects of leaking to the press.

With the $170 billion allocated to DHS in recent legislation, Noem has embarked on a high-visibility media campaign, appearing at immigration hotspots across the country. The department has reportedly spent over $50 million on commercials featuring Noem thanking Trump for border security efforts. Critics have described her approach as propaganda designed to normalize aggressive enforcement actions within American cities.

Under Noem’s leadership, DHS has emerged as what one former official described to Terris as “Trump’s most devastating and visible weapon against the right’s perceived enemies,” with the official predicting Noem could become “the warden of the police state” if she remains in her position throughout Trump’s term.

For Noem, who once justified shooting her dog by saying she was willing to do things that are “difficult, messy and ugly,” the position appears to be a stepping stone. Political observers believe she is positioning herself for a presidential run in 2028, calculating that her image as a hardline enforcer of Trump’s immigration policies will resonate with the Republican base.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

11 Comments

  1. Interesting to see the dynamics between Noem and Lewandowski. Allegations of an affair and inappropriate behavior are concerning, though the details are still unclear. I wonder how this will impact Noem’s political standing and Trump’s law enforcement vision going forward.

    • Yes, the alleged improper relationship and scandals raise questions about the integrity and judgment of those involved. It will be important to see how this story develops and whether it affects their respective roles and influence.

  2. This is a complex and multi-faceted story. The alleged personal relationship between Noem and Lewandowski, combined with the implications for Trump’s law enforcement vision, raises a lot of questions. I hope the truth comes to light, regardless of the political ramifications.

  3. Michael Thomas on

    This is a complex and potentially troubling situation. The alleged affair and inappropriate behavior, combined with the implications for Noem’s role in shaping Trump’s law enforcement agenda, raise significant ethical and political questions. I’ll be following this story closely to see how it unfolds.

  4. The relationship between Noem and Lewandowski seems rife with controversy and potential conflicts of interest. I’m curious to learn more about the specifics of the allegations and how this might impact Noem’s standing and Trump’s law enforcement priorities.

    • Yes, the blurring of personal and professional boundaries is concerning, especially given their positions of power. Transparency and accountability will be crucial in addressing these issues.

  5. The details surrounding Noem and Lewandowski’s relationship and its potential impact on Trump’s law enforcement agenda are concerning. I’ll be following this story closely to see how it develops and what the broader implications might be.

    • Agreed, the intersection of personal, professional, and political interests in this case is troubling. It’s crucial that the public gets a clear, unbiased understanding of the facts and their consequences.

  6. Patricia Davis on

    This seems like a messy and complicated situation involving both personal and professional relationships. I’m curious to learn more about the specifics of the allegations against Lewandowski and Noem’s role in the Trump administration’s law enforcement priorities.

    • Mary Hernandez on

      Agreed, the blurring of personal and political lines is concerning. It will be important for the public to get a clear and unbiased understanding of what transpired and the implications for those involved.

  7. The article highlights some concerning allegations and questions around the relationship between Noem and Lewandowski. While the details are still emerging, it’s troubling to see potential misconduct and conflicts of interest at this level of government. I hope this gets properly investigated.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.