Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In an unprecedented development that has sparked controversy across the nation, multiple U.S. airports are refusing to air a Department of Homeland Security video featuring Secretary Kristi Noem blaming Democrats for the ongoing government shutdown.

At least 13 airports have declined to show the message, which was intended for security checkpoint viewing areas where travelers congregate before boarding flights. The video shows Secretary Noem stating: “It is TSA’s top priority to make sure that you have the most pleasant and efficient airport experience as possible while we keep you safe. However, Democrats in Congress refuse to fund the federal government, and because of this, many of our operations are impacted, and most of our TSA employees are working without pay.”

Airport officials have cited potential violations of the Hatch Act, a federal law that restricts government employees from engaging in partisan political activities using official resources. A spokesperson from Portland International Airport explained their decision in a statement to CNN, saying: “We did not consent to playing the video in its current form, as we believe the Hatch Act clearly prohibits use of public assets for political purposes and messaging.”

Similarly, a representative from a Nevada airport noted they “declined” to air the message due to its “political messaging that did not align with the neutral, informational nature of the public service announcements typically shown at the security checkpoints.”

The nation is currently in day 14 of a partial government shutdown that has affected approximately 1.4 million federal employees who have been either furloughed or required to work without immediate compensation. The Transportation Security Administration has been particularly impacted, with thousands of TSA officers continuing to staff security checkpoints despite the pay interruption.

Flight operations have also suffered during the shutdown. According to MiseryMap, a flight tracking tool, thousands of flights have experienced delays since the shutdown began on October 1. These disruptions come during one of the busiest travel seasons, compounding frustrations for both travelers and transportation workers.

When questioned about the controversial video, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin defended the messaging, reiterating almost verbatim Secretary Noem’s claim that Democrats were responsible for the funding impasse.

The political standoff leading to the shutdown—the second during a Trump administration—centers largely around healthcare funding. Republican legislators have refused to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies that are set to expire for approximately 22 million Americans by year’s end.

Transportation industry analysts note that introducing politically charged messaging into airport environments represents a significant departure from standard practice. Airports typically limit public service announcements to safety information, security protocols, or general travel advisories that maintain political neutrality.

Legal experts suggest the video may indeed cross ethical boundaries. Federal guidelines generally prohibit using government resources for partisan communications, particularly those that explicitly assign blame to a specific political party for ongoing policy disputes.

As the shutdown continues with no immediate resolution in sight, the controversy surrounding Noem’s airport message highlights the increasingly politicized nature of government operations and raises questions about appropriate use of federal communication channels during times of fiscal crisis.

For travelers already navigating the stresses of security lines, flight delays, and crowded terminals, the addition of partisan messaging represents yet another unexpected complication in the already challenging landscape of modern air travel.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

6 Comments

  1. Patricia Thomas on

    This certainly raises some concerns about the appropriate use of government resources for partisan political messaging. I appreciate airports taking a principled stand to avoid violations of the Hatch Act.

    • Amelia Jackson on

      It’s a tricky balance between informing the public and avoiding overtly partisan rhetoric. Airports seem to be trying to navigate that responsibly.

  2. Oliver Hernandez on

    This is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. On one hand, the public has a right to information about how government operations are being affected. On the other, using official channels for partisan attacks raises ethical concerns.

    • Jennifer Moore on

      I’ll be interested to see how this plays out and whether there are any legal challenges or policy changes as a result. Maintaining the integrity of public spaces is crucial.

  3. Emma P. Johnson on

    While I understand Secretary Noem’s desire to highlight the impacts of the government shutdown, using airport screens for partisan political statements does seem problematic. Maintaining neutral public spaces is important.

    • I’m curious to hear more about the legal and ethical considerations around this issue. It could set an concerning precedent if government officials can leverage public infrastructure for political messaging.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.