Listen to the article
Controversial “Kerala Story 2” Ignites Political and Cultural Debate Ahead of Release
The upcoming release of “The Kerala Story 2: Goes Beyond” has sparked renewed controversy across India, with filmmakers, politicians, and civil society groups weighing in on its contentious portrayal of religious conversion and interfaith relationships. The film, a sequel to the controversial original released nearly three years ago, has drawn sharp criticism from prominent figures in the film industry and Kerala state officials.
Acclaimed director Anurag Kashyap didn’t mince words when speaking to reporters at Kochi airport, dismissing the film as “propaganda” and questioning its intentions. “Kerala Story movie is s*. The movie is propaganda and bull**,” Kashyap stated bluntly, specifically ridiculing a scene depicting forced beef consumption as unrealistic. “Who even feeds beef like that? You wouldn’t even serve khichdi that way,” he remarked.
Kashyap further accused the filmmakers of prioritizing financial gain over responsible storytelling. “The purpose of the film is to make money. They just want to please everybody and divide people. The filmmaker is a greedy man. He just wants to make money,” he asserted.
The sequel, produced by Vipul Amrutlal Shah and directed by Kamakhya Narayan Singh, claims to be “inspired by many true events” and continues its predecessor’s controversial narrative. The film allegedly depicts young Hindu women being deceived into interfaith marriages, subsequently facing abuse, rights violations, and forced religious conversion to Islam.
Political figures have also entered the fray, with Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan condemning the film as “false propaganda” and “poisonous” during a statement issued Thursday. The Chief Minister’s intervention signals the significant political dimensions of the controversy, particularly in Kerala, where the film’s portrayal has been viewed as potentially damaging to the state’s reputation for religious harmony and progressive values.
The legal system has become involved following a petition filed by biologist Sreedev Namboodiri in the Kerala High Court challenging the film’s release. The court has issued notices to multiple parties, including the Information and Broadcasting Ministry, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), and the film’s producer. The case is scheduled for hearing on February 24, just days before the planned release date.
Despite the mounting controversy, the CBFC has granted the film a U/A certificate, allowing younger audiences to view it with parental guidance. The production team has welcomed this certification decision, emphasizing the importance of reaching younger viewers with their message.
Starring Ulka Gupta, Aditi Bhatia, and Aishwarya Ojha in lead roles, “The Kerala Story 2” is scheduled for theatrical release on February 27, though pending legal challenges could potentially affect this timeline.
The controversy surrounding the film reflects broader tensions in Indian society regarding religious conversion narratives, interfaith relationships, and cinematic representations of sensitive social issues. Critics argue that such films risk inflaming communal tensions, while supporters maintain they shine a light on important but uncomfortable realities.
Industry analysts note that controversy has historically boosted box office performance for many Indian films. The original “Kerala Story” benefited significantly from the national debate it generated, with polarized opinions driving audience curiosity and ticket sales. Whether the sequel will repeat this pattern remains to be seen, particularly as the discourse around representation and responsible filmmaking continues to evolve in India’s entertainment landscape.
As the release date approaches, the film continues to generate intense public debate about the boundaries between artistic expression, historical accuracy, and social responsibility in contemporary Indian cinema.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
5 Comments
As someone interested in the mining and energy sectors, I’ll be curious to see how this film portrays related issues like resource extraction and religious conflicts. Responsible representation matters.
The debate around this film highlights the challenges of navigating complex cultural and religious dynamics through media. Filmmakers have a responsibility to portray these issues thoughtfully and sensitively.
I agree. Dividing people and making money shouldn’t be the primary goals. Nuanced, balanced storytelling is important, especially on such sensitive topics.
This film sounds like it’s stirring up a lot of controversy and political tensions. I’m curious to learn more about the filmmakers’ intentions and how they’re portraying sensitive religious and cultural issues.
Dismissing the film as pure propaganda seems a bit strong. But the director’s comments about unrealistic depictions and prioritizing profits over responsible storytelling are worth considering.