Listen to the article
Music Maestro AR Rahman’s Comments Spark Controversy with Bollywood Figures
Oscar-winning composer AR Rahman has ignited a firestorm in Bollywood circles after referring to Vicky Kaushal’s upcoming film “Chhaava” as “divisive” and discussing his diminished presence in Hindi cinema over the past eight years. The controversy has drawn sharp reactions from industry figures, most notably actress-turned-politician Kangana Ranaut.
Rahman, in a recent interview with BBC, suggested the film “cashed in on divisiveness,” though he acknowledged its core message of portraying bravery. “Chhaava,” directed by Laxman Utekar, chronicles the life of Maratha warrior Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj and is positioned as a historical drama.
The composer revealed he had questioned the director about his selection for the project. “I asked him, ‘Why do you need me for this film?’ and he said, ‘We need only you for this,'” Rahman explained. He further expressed his belief that audiences are discerning enough to distinguish between historical narratives and manipulation, stating, “People have something called an internal conscience, which knows what the truth is and what manipulation is.”
Kangana Ranaut, known for her outspoken nature and political affiliations, responded forcefully to Rahman’s comments on social media. Sharing a screenshot of his interview, she wrote, “Dear @arrahman ji, I face so much prejudice and partiality in the film industry because I support a saffron party, yet I must say I have not come across a man more prejudiced and hateful than you.”
Ranaut, who has directed and starred in the political drama “Emergency,” claimed Rahman had refused to even meet with her regarding potential collaboration on the film. “I desperately wanted to narrate my directorial Emergency to you. Forget narration, you even refused to meet me. I was told you don’t want to be part of a propaganda film,” she alleged.
She further asserted that despite Rahman’s apparent dismissal, “Emergency” received critical acclaim from diverse quarters. “Ironically, Emergency was called a masterpiece by all critics. Even opposition party leaders sent me fan letters appreciating the film for its balanced and compassionate approach, but you are blinded by your hate,” Ranaut added.
This exchange highlights the increasingly polarized nature of India’s film industry, where political affiliations and ideological stances can influence professional relationships and creative collaborations. Rahman, who rose to international fame with his work on “Slumdog Millionaire” and has been a mainstay in Indian cinema for decades, has seen his Bollywood projects decrease in recent years, a situation he attributes to changing industry dynamics.
The controversy surrounding “Chhaava” reflects broader tensions in Indian cinema regarding the portrayal of historical figures and events. Historical dramas have increasingly become lightning rods for controversy in India’s politically charged environment, with different stakeholders often contesting interpretations of shared history.
This public disagreement between two prominent industry figures underscores the challenges facing Bollywood as it navigates the intersection of artistic expression, historical representation, and contemporary politics. With “Chhaava” still awaiting release and Ranaut’s “Emergency” generating its own discussions, the debate over creative responsibility and historical interpretation in Indian cinema shows no signs of abating.
As the industry watches this unfolding controversy, it raises questions about the freedom of artistic expression and the increasing politicization of cinema in what remains one of the world’s largest and most influential film industries.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


10 Comments
Interesting to see the creative differences between AR Rahman and Bollywood figures over the portrayal of history in films. It’s good that Rahman is taking a thoughtful approach and voicing his concerns about potential propaganda.
I agree, it’s important for artists to maintain their integrity and not compromise their principles, even when facing pressure. Rahman’s comments highlight the delicate balance between historical accuracy and commercial interests.
This is a thought-provoking situation that touches on the delicate balance between creative expression and political narratives. Rahman’s decision to decline the project based on concerns over propaganda is a principled stance that deserves recognition.
The debate over Rahman’s comments highlights the complex relationship between art, politics, and historical representation. It’s encouraging to see a respected figure in the industry voicing concerns about preserving artistic authenticity.
It’s good to see artists like AR Rahman taking a stand against the potential misuse of their work for propaganda purposes. Maintaining creative integrity is important, even in the face of commercial pressures.
Rahman’s stance on avoiding projects that could be seen as promoting propaganda is a refreshing reminder of the responsibility that comes with creating art. It will be interesting to see how this controversy unfolds in the Bollywood landscape.
The disagreement between Rahman and Bollywood figures over the portrayal of historical events in films is a complex issue. It’s good to see artists like Rahman taking a stand to maintain the integrity of their work.
This controversy raises important questions about the role of art and entertainment in shaping public perceptions of history. Rahman’s stance on avoiding propaganda in films is admirable, though it may put him at odds with some industry players.
You make a fair point. As a renowned composer, Rahman has the platform to influence how historical narratives are portrayed on screen. His decision to decline the project based on concerns over propaganda is commendable.
Rahman’s comments highlight the importance of artistic independence and the need to avoid the manipulation of historical narratives for political or ideological purposes. It’s a challenging issue that deserves thoughtful consideration.