Listen to the article
Border Patrol’s promotional content has sparked controversy in El Paso’s music community, as local musician Jordan Williams recently took to social media to condemn the agency’s unauthorized use of his song in what he described as a “propaganda” video.
Williams, who performs under the name Frythm, discovered that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had featured his track “Breakthrough” in a recruitment video without obtaining permission or providing compensation. The musician expressed his frustration in a post that quickly gained traction among local artists and immigration advocates.
“I was shocked to see my work being used to promote an agency whose practices I fundamentally disagree with,” Williams told reporters. “As an El Paso native, I’ve witnessed firsthand how Border Patrol policies affect our community, and I never consented to having my art associated with their message.”
The video in question appeared on CBP’s official social media channels and featured scenes of agents patrolling the southern border, interspersed with training montages and ceremonial events. Williams’ electronic instrumental track played prominently throughout, creating an upbeat backdrop for the recruitment pitch.
This incident highlights the growing tension between federal agencies operating along the U.S.-Mexico border and the predominantly Hispanic communities they serve. El Paso, situated directly across from Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, has long been at the center of national immigration debates and border enforcement policies.
Legal experts note that Williams likely has grounds for a copyright infringement claim. Entertainment attorney Elena Ramirez explained, “Federal agencies, just like any other entity, must secure proper licensing for commercial music use. There are specific procedures for government bodies to license music, and it appears those weren’t followed in this case.”
CBP representatives responded to initial inquiries with a statement saying they are “looking into the matter” and that they “respect intellectual property rights.” The agency has since removed the video from their primary platforms, though copies continue to circulate online.
Williams’ stance has resonated with many in El Paso’s vibrant arts scene, where creative expression often intersects with political consciousness. Fellow musician Roberto Mendez of the band Frontera Bugalú voiced support: “What happened to Jordan is unfortunately common. Our border community’s culture gets appropriated while the real issues facing our region are glossed over.”
This controversy emerges amid increased scrutiny of Border Patrol tactics and messaging. In recent years, the agency has ramped up recruitment efforts as it faces staffing challenges and high turnover rates. Marketing campaigns have become more sophisticated, utilizing social media and contemporary aesthetics to appeal to younger potential recruits.
Community organizers like Maria Gonzalez from the Border Network for Human Rights see this incident as symptomatic of broader concerns: “There’s a disconnect between how these agencies present themselves and how their actions impact border communities. Using local art without permission while implementing policies many locals oppose shows a fundamental disrespect.”
Williams has consulted with legal representation regarding his options but says his primary goal is raising awareness. “This isn’t just about my music being used without permission. It’s about an agency co-opting art from the very communities affected by their enforcement actions,” he said.
The musician has received an outpouring of support on social media, with fans and fellow artists encouraging him to pursue legal action. Some have even suggested organizing a benefit concert to raise funds for immigrant rights organizations in response.
For Border Patrol, this mishap represents a setback in their efforts to improve community relations in border regions like El Paso, where trust between residents and federal law enforcement has been strained by controversial policies and increased militarization.
As Williams considers his next steps, the incident serves as a reminder of the complex relationship between art, politics, and representation in border communities. It also underscores how social media has empowered artists to control their work’s context and association, even when confronting powerful government agencies.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

11 Comments
This is a concerning example of government overreach. Artists should have control over how their work is used, especially when it involves politically charged issues like border enforcement. The Border Patrol’s actions seem like a clear violation of the musician’s rights.
This is a clear case of the Border Patrol overstepping. Even if they felt the song was a good fit, they should have reached out to the artist first. Using it in a promotional video without consent is a violation of the musician’s rights.
This is really unfortunate. Artists shouldn’t have their work co-opted without consent, especially for government propaganda like this. It’s disappointing to see the Border Patrol misusing creative content in this way.
I agree, the lack of permission and compensation is problematic. Musicians deserve control over how their art is used, especially for causes they may not support.
As an El Paso local, I can understand the musician’s perspective. The Border Patrol’s actions show a lack of respect for the community and its artists. Unauthorized use of creative work is unethical.
Absolutely. The musician has every right to speak out against the misuse of his song. This sets a concerning precedent if government agencies can appropriate art without permission.
This is a tricky situation. On one hand, the musician has a right to control how his creative work is used. But the Border Patrol may have felt the song was a good fit for their video. Still, they should have sought permission first before incorporating it.
It’s understandable that the musician feels his art has been misused for propaganda purposes. The Border Patrol should respect artists’ intellectual property rights and obtain consent before using their work, even if they believe it fits their message.
Agreed. The lack of permission is the core issue here. The Border Patrol needs to be more mindful of these kinds of ethical concerns when using creative content, rather than just appropriating it for their own ends.
I’m curious to know more about the musician’s perspective. What specifically concerns him about the Border Patrol’s policies and how they affect the El Paso community? His objections seem reasonable, but I’d like to understand the deeper context.
That’s a good point. The article hints at the musician’s local knowledge and concerns about Border Patrol practices, so it would be helpful to hear more detail on his views and how he feels the community is impacted.