Listen to the article
The death of a celebrated Chinese herder, once lauded by state media as a national role model, has reignited debate about the human cost of propaganda in a country where ordinary citizens can be rapidly thrust into the spotlight to serve political narratives.
Li Wenqiong, known across China as the “horseback teacher,” died last week at just 38 years old from complications related to leukemia. Her rise to fame began in 2017 when state media highlighted her dedication to educating children in a remote mountainous region of southwestern Sichuan province.
Li’s story initially captivated the nation. Images of the young woman riding horseback through treacherous mountain paths to reach her students in an isolated village school became a powerful symbol of dedication to education in rural China. State media portrayed her as selflessly traversing dangerous terrain daily, embodying the Communist Party’s narrative of rural revitalization and commitment to education for all.
However, as news of her untimely death spread across Chinese social media, public discourse quickly shifted from mourning to questioning the circumstances that led to her national fame and subsequent health struggles.
“The mountains took her life,” wrote one commenter on Weibo, China’s Twitter-like platform, where Li’s death has generated millions of views and thousands of comments. Many users questioned whether the physically demanding routine she maintained for publicity purposes had contributed to her illness and premature death.
The controversy highlights a recurring pattern in China’s propaganda machinery, where ordinary individuals are elevated to celebrity status to embody political values the government wishes to promote. Similar figures include Lei Feng, a soldier celebrated as a model of selfless dedication since the 1960s, and more recently, figures like the “Iron Man” oil worker Wang Jinxi.
“There’s a long tradition in China of creating model citizens who exemplify the values the Party wants to instill,” explains Dr. Maria Repnikova, a scholar of Chinese political communication at Georgia State University. “These figures serve as powerful tools to humanize abstract political goals, but the system rarely considers the personal toll on those chosen for these roles.”
Following Li’s initial media coverage, local officials reportedly encouraged her to continue her horseback journeys even after roads to the village were improved, maintaining the compelling visual narrative that had captured public attention. Critics now suggest that the physical strain of these unnecessary journeys, combined with the pressure of sudden fame, may have exacerbated her health condition.
The Ministry of Education had recognized Li as a “national excellent teacher,” and she was featured prominently in campaigns promoting rural education and poverty alleviation – two signature initiatives under President Xi Jinping’s leadership.
The backlash following her death reflects growing public skepticism toward propaganda narratives in China, particularly among younger, internet-savvy citizens who increasingly question the authenticity of state-promoted stories. This demographic has shown greater willingness to challenge official accounts, even within the constraints of China’s heavily censored media environment.
“The public reaction to Li’s death reveals a sophisticated understanding of how propaganda works,” notes Dr. Jonathan Hassid, an expert on Chinese media at Iowa State University. “Many citizens can simultaneously mourn a genuine hero while questioning the system that may have exploited her story.”
China’s rural-urban divide remains one of the country’s most pressing socioeconomic challenges, with educational disparities a particular concern. While Li’s story highlighted the government’s stated commitment to addressing these inequalities, her death has inadvertently drawn attention to the persistent hardships facing rural communities.
The education bureau in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, where Li worked, released a statement honoring her contributions but did not address the controversy surrounding her portrayal in state media. Meanwhile, censors have been actively removing some of the more pointed criticisms from social media platforms.
As China continues its push for “common prosperity” and rural revitalization, Li Wenqiong’s legacy serves as both inspiration and caution – a reminder of genuine dedication to education, but also of the potential human cost when individual lives become instruments of political messaging.
For a system accustomed to controlling narratives, the public’s nuanced response to Li’s death presents a challenging paradox: the very heroes created to strengthen faith in the system sometimes end up, in their suffering, undermining it instead.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
The state media’s portrayal of Li Wenqiong as a ‘heroic horsewoman’ seems like a classic case of propaganda. While her dedication is admirable, the system that pushed her to such extremes is deeply flawed.
You’re right, this story highlights the darker side of China’s propaganda machine. Tragic that Li’s hardships were exploited rather than her actual needs being addressed.
As a teacher myself, I’m saddened to hear about the challenges Li Wenqiong faced. Rural educators deserve far more support and resources than they often receive. Her story is a stark reminder of the human cost of political narratives.
Well said. Too often, the real struggles of teachers and students in underserved areas get overshadowed by propaganda. Li’s sacrifice deserves genuine policy changes, not empty platitudes.
This is a tragic story. It’s troubling to see how Li Wenqiong’s hardships were exploited for propaganda purposes, rather than addressing the systemic challenges facing rural education and healthcare. Her sacrifice deserves more than empty rhetoric.
Agreed. The human cost of propaganda is often overlooked. Hopefully her legacy can inspire meaningful reforms to support teachers and students in remote areas, not just empty PR.
It’s tragic that Li Wenqiong’s inspirational story ultimately ended in her untimely death. This case highlights the dangers of using ordinary citizens as propaganda tools, rather than addressing the systemic challenges they face.
Absolutely. Exploiting someone’s hardships for political gain is unethical. Li’s story deserves to be remembered for her genuine commitment to education, not the propaganda machine that elevated her.
This is a sobering example of how state media can distort and exploit individual narratives to serve political agendas. While Li Wenqiong’s dedication was admirable, the system that pushed her to such extremes clearly failed her.
This is a heartbreaking story that exposes the human cost of propaganda. While Li Wenqiong’s dedication to her students was admirable, the state’s use of her story as a political narrative failed to address the real challenges facing rural education and healthcare.
It’s a shame that Li Wenqiong’s inspirational story was ultimately undermined by her untimely death. This cautionary tale shows the risks of using ordinary citizens as propaganda tools, rather than enacting meaningful reforms.